Polyp characteristics correctly annotated by computer-aided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologists during CT colonography

Radiology

Volumn 253, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 715-723

  Taylor, Stuart A ^a   Robinson, Charlotte ^a   Boone, Darren ^a   Honeyfield, Lesley ^b   Halligan, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Medicsight   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 73949138955     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2533090356     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yee J. Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough? Radiology 2005;237:26-27.
2. Dachman AH, Kelly KB, Zintsmaster MP, et al. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers. Radiology 2008;249:167-177.
3. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1025-1033.
4. Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 2004;11:750-756.
5. Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E, et al. Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2275-2283.
6. Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, Rockey DC, Suzuki K, Dachman AH. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 2007;244:165-173.
7. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2598-2607.
8. Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 2008;246:148-156.
9. Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA, et al. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? preliminary findings. Radiology 2007;245:140-149.
10. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P, et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 2008;246:463-471.
11. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:696 -702.
12. Taylor SA, Brittenden J, Lenton J, et al. Influence of CAD generated false positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1682-1689.
13. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1690-1699.
14. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:881-889.
15. Summers RM, Frentz SM, Liu J, et al. Conspicuity of colorectal polyps at CT colonography: visual assessment, CAD performance, and the important role of polyp height. Acad Radiol 2009;16:4-14.
16. Macari M, Bini EJ. CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology 2005;237:819-833.
17. O'Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR, Pickhardt PJ. Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:51-57.
18. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975;36:2251-2270.
19. Taylor SA, Greenhalgh R, Ilangovan R, et al. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population. Radiology 2008;247:133-140.
20. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1207-1217.