Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: Multiobserver study

Radiology

Volumn 258, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 469-476

  Halligan, Steve ^a   Mallett, Susan ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^a   McQuillan, Justine ^a   Proud, Maria ^a   Beddoe, Gareth ^a   Honeyfield, Lesley ^a   Taylor, Stuart A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79952350320     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100354     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Yoshida H, Dachman AH. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 2005;30(1):26-41. (Pubitemid 40169505)
2. Summers RM. Challenges for computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002;27(3):268-274. (Pubitemid 36459408)
3. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005;129(6):1832-1844. (Pubitemid 41772962)
4. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(3):696-702. (Pubitemid 46100255)
5. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131(6):1690-1699. (Pubitemid 44958520)
6. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17(10):2598-2607.
7. Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 2008;246(1):148-156. (Pubitemid 350305038)
8. Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA, et al. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? preliminary findings. Radiology 2007;245(1):140-149.
9. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P, et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 2008;246(2):463-471.
10. Gur D, Bandos AI, Cohen CS, et al. The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations. Radiology 2008;249(1):47-53.
11. Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(3):786-792. (Pubitemid 43899502)
12. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17(2):575-579. (Pubitemid 46140331)
13. Halligan S, Taylor SA, Dehmeshki J, et al. Computer-assisted detection for CT colonography: external validation. Clin Radiol 2006;61(9):758-763; discussion 764-765.
14. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356(14):1399-1409. (Pubitemid 46556325)
15. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359(16):1675-1684.
16. Dodd LE, Wagner RF, Armato SG 3rd, et al. Assessment methodologies and statistical issues for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules in computed tomography: contemporary research topics relevant to the lung image database consortium. Acad Radiol 2004;11(4):462-475. (Pubitemid 38405374)
17. de Vries AH, Jensch S, Liedenbaum MH, et al. Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk? Eur Radiol 2009;19(4):941-950.
18. Mani A, Napel S, Paik DS, et al. Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(3):318-326.
19. Rockey DC, Barish M, Brill JV, et al. Standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2007;133(3):1005-1024. (Pubitemid 47376890)
20. Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008;135(4):1100-1105.
21. Park SH, Choi EK, Lee SS, et al. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Radiology 2007;244(1):157-164. (Pubitemid 46981970)
22. Punwani S, Halligan S, Irving P, et al. Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate? Eur Radiol 2008;18(5):874-881.
23. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359(12):1207-1217.
24. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349(23):2191-2200. (Pubitemid 37485135)