Boards and Sustainability: The Contingent Influence of Director Interlocks on Corporate Environmental Performance

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 499-517

  Ortiz de Mandojana, Natalia ^a   Aragon Correa, Juan Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Board of directors; Director interlocks; Environmental performance; Social capital; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; CORPORATE STRATEGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; PLANNING THEORY; SOCIAL CAPITAL; SUSTAINABILITY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84942371601     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1833     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Acquaah M. 2007. Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1235-1255. DOI:10.1002/smj.632
2. Aguilera RV, Filatotchev I, Gospel H, Jackson G. 2008. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science 19: 475-492. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
3. Aragon-Correa JA, Sharma S. 2003. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review 28: 71-88.
4. Aragon-Correa JA. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 41: 556-567. DOI:10.2307/256942
5. Azzone G, Noci G. 1996. Measuring the environmental performance of new products: an integrated approach. International Journal of Production Research 34: 3055-3078. DOI:10.1080/00207549608905077
6. Bansal P. 2005.Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26: 197-218. DOI: 10.1002/smj.441
7. Barney J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99-120. DOI: 10.1177/014920639101700108
8. Bazerman MH, Schoorman FD. 1983. A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. Academy of Management Review 8: 206-217.
9. Berrone P, Gomez-Mejia LR. 2009. Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal 52: 103-126. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461950
10. Burt RS. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 339-365.
11. Burt RS. 1980. Cooptive corporate actor networks: A reconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 557-581.
12. Carpenter MA, Westphal JD. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 44: 639-660. DOI:10.2307/3069408
13. Chang SJ, Hong J. 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal 43: 429-448. DOI: 10.2307/1556403
14. Christmann P. 2004. Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal 47: 747-760. DOI: 10.2307/20159616
15. Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95-120
16. Collins CJ, Clark KD. 2003. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resources in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal 46: 740-751.DOI: 10.2307/30040665
17. Darnall N, Edwards D Jr. 2006. Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal 27: 301-320.DOI: 10.1002/smj.518
18. Daily BF, Huang S. 2001.Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 21: 1539-1552.
19. Delmas M, Russo MV, Montes-Sancho MJ. 2007. Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management Journal 28: 189-209. DOI: 10.1002/smj.578
20. Delmas M, Tokat Y. 2005. Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: The U.S. electric utility sector. Strategic Management Journal 26: 441-460. DOI: 10.1002/smj.456
21. Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID). 2007. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/index.html (31 July 2010).
22. Energy Information Administration. 2000. The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry 2000: An Update. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/chg_stru_update /update2000.html.
23. Energy Information Administration. 2009. Electricity in the US. US Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC. http://www.eia.doe.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=electricity_in_the_united_states. (20 January 2011).
24. Energy Information Administration. 2010. http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelelectric.html. (31 July 2010).
25. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. eGRID2007 year 2005 Technical Support Document. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/documents/egridzips/eGRID2007TechnicalSupportDocument.pdf. (31 July 2010).
26. Fiol CM, Lyles MA. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review 10: 803-813.
27. Forbes DP, Milliken FJ. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Journal 24: 489-505. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1999.2202133
28. Galbreath J. 2010. Corporate Governance Practices that Address Climate Change: an Exploratory Study. Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 335-350. DOI: 10.1002/bse.648
29. Goerzen A. 2007. Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal 28: 487-509. DOI: 10.1002/smj.588
30. Golden BR, Zajac EJ. 2001. When will boards influence strategy? Inclination x power equals strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 22: 1087-1111. DOI: 10.1002/smj.202
31. Goodstein J, Gautam K, Boeker W. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 15: 241-250. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250150305
32. Goodstein J, Boeker W. 1991. Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Academy of Management Journal 34: 306-330. DOI: 10.2307/256444
33. Grant RM. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33: 114-135.
34. Hart SL. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20: 986-1014. DOI:10.2307/258963
35. Haunschild PR, Beckman CM. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 815-844. DOI: 10.2307/2393617
36. Heikkurinen P, Ketola T. 2012. Corporate Responsibility and Identity: from a Stakeholder to an Awareness Approach. Business Strategy and the Environment 21: 326-337. DOI: 10.1002/bse.744
37. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381-395. DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1996.0026
38. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42: 87-99. DOI: 10.2307/256876
39. Hillman AJ, Cannella AA, Paetzold RL. 2000. The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies 37: 235-255. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00179
40. Hillman AJ, Dalziel T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28: 383-396. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729
41. Hofmann KH, Theyel G, Wood CH. 2012. Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices: Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment 21: 530-545. DOI: 10.1002/bse.739
42. Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change. 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventoties. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ vol1.html
43. Kang E. 2008. Director Interlocks and Spillover Effects of Reputational Penalties from Financial Reporting Fraud. Academy of Management Journal 51: 537-555. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.32626007
44. Kassinis G, Vafeas N. 2002. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal 23: 399-415. DOI: 10.1002/smj.230
45. Kassinis G, Vafeas N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal 49: 145-159. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785799
46. Kim Y, Cannella A. 2008. Toward a social capital theory of director selection. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16: 282-293. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00693.x
47. Kim H, Hoskisson RE. 1996. Japanese governance systems: A critical review. Advances in International Comparative Management 11: 165-189.
48. King AA, Lenox MJ. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal 43: 698-716. DOI: 10.2307/1556362
49. Kolk A. 2008. Sustainability, Accountability and Corporate Governance: Exploring Multinationals' Reporting Practices. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 1-15. DOI: 10.1002/bse.511
50. Kroll M, Walters BA, Wright P. 2008. Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal 29: 363-382. DOI: 10.1002/smj.649
51. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2008. Renewables Portfolio Standards in the Unites States. A status report with data through 2007.htpp://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/lbnl-154e.pdf
52. Lenox M, King A. 2004. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal 25: 331-345. DOI: 10.1002/smj.379
53. Lenox M, King A, Ehrenfeld J. 2000. An assessment of design-for-environment practices in leading US electronics firms. Interfaces 30: 83-94. DOI: 10.1287/inte.30.3.83.11669
54. Lester RH, Hillman A, Zardkoohi A, Cannella AA. 2008. Former Government officials as outside directors: the role of the human and social capital. Academy of Management Journal 51: 999-1013.
55. Lewis GJ, Harvey B. 2001. Perceived environmental uncertainty: The extension of miller's scale to the natural environment. Journal of Management Studies 38: 201-233. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00234
56. Lin N. 2001. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England.
57. López-Gamero MD, Zaragoza-Sáez P, Claver-Cortés E, Molina-Azorín F. 2011. Sustainable development and intangibles: building sustainable intellectual capital. Business Strategy and the Environment 20: 18-37. DOI: 10.1002/bse.666
58. Marcus A. 2005. Research in strategic environmental management. In Corporate Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage, Sharma S, Aragón-Correa JA (eds). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK- Northampton, Ma, USA.
59. Marcus A, Fremeth A. 2009. Green management matters regardless. The Academy of Management Perspectives 23: 17-26. DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2009.43479261
60. Marcus A, Geffen D. 1998. The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management Journal 19: 1145-1168. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1145::AID-SMJ6>3.0.CO;2-B
61. Masters B. 2009. Footsie directors who work across the boards. Financial Times. London (UK): Sep 15, 2009 pg. 19.
62. McFadyen MA, Cannella AA. 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal 47: 735-746. DOI: 10.2307/20159615
63. Miles RN, Snow CC. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure and process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
64. Moran P. 2005. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal 26: 1129-1151. DOI: 10.1002/smj.486
65. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23: 242-266. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1998.533225
66. Nicholson GJ, Malcolm A, Kiel GC. 2004. Defining the social capital of the board of directors: An exploratory study. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 10: 54-72.
67. Palmer DA, Jennings PD, Zhou X. 1993. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 100-131.
68. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 1-28. DOI: 10.2307/2667029
69. Peng MW, Luo Y. 2000. Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-macro Link. Academy of Management Journal 43: 486-501. DOI: 10.2307/1556406
70. Public Utility Holding Company. Act of 2005. Energy Policy Act of 2005. Public Law 109-58-Aug. 8, 2005. http://www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/publ_109-058.pdf
71. Pugliese A, Wenstøp PZ. 2007. Board members' contribution to strategic decision-making in small firms. Journal of Management & Governance 11: 383-404. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-007-9036-3
72. Ramus CA, Steger U. 2000. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee " ecoinitiatives" at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal 43: 605-626. DOI: 10.2307/1556357
73. Ravasi D. Zattoni A. 2006. Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed-ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies 43: 1671-1702. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x
74. Rindova VP. 1999. What corporate boards have to do with strategy: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Studies 36: 953-977.
75. Rodriguez-Melo A, Mansouri SA. 2011. Stakeholder engagement: Defining strategic advantage for sustainable construction. Business Strategy and the Environment 20: 539-552. DOI: 10.1002/bse.715
76. Rowlands IH, Scott D, Parker P. 2003. Consumers and green electricity: profiling potential purchasers. Business Strategy and the Environment 12: 36-48. DOI: 10.1002/bse.346
77. Ruigrok W, Peck SI, Keller H. 2006. Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies 43: 1201-1237.
78. Russo MV, Fouts PA. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40: 534-559. DOI: 10.2307/257052
79. Russo MV, Harrison NS. 2005. Organizational design and environmental performance clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal 48: 582-593. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17843939
80. Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal 44: 219-237. DOI: 10.2307/3069452
81. Sharma A, Kesner IF. 1996. Diversifying entry: Some ex ante explanations for postentry survival and growth. Academy of Management Journal 39: 635-677. DOI: 10.2307/256658
82. Sharma S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43: 681-697. DOI: 10.2307/1556361
83. Sharma S. 2009. The mediating effect of information availability between organization design variables and environmental practices in the Canadian hotel industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 266-276. DOI: 10.1002/bse.603
84. Sharma S, Henriques I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal 26: 159-180. DOI: 10.1002/smj.439
85. Sharma S, Vredenburg H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19: 729-753. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4
86. Shropshire C. 2010. The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review 35: 246-264.
87. Siebenhüner B, Arnold M. 2007. Organizational learning to manage sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment 16: 339-353. DOI: 10.1002/bse.579
88. Stevenson W, Radin RF. 2009. Social Capital and Social Influence on the Board of Directors. Journal of Management Studies 46: 16-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00800.x
89. Teece D. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1319-1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640
90. Tricker B. 2009.Corporate Governance. Principles, Polices and Practices. Oxford University Press Inc.: New York
91. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) database U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. http://www.epa.gov/triexplorer/geography.htm (31 July 2010).
92. U.S Census Boureau. 2008. Land and Water Area of States and Other Entities: 2008. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/geography_environment/land_and_land_us e.html (31 July 2010).
93. Walls JL, Berrone P, Phan H. 2012. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal 33: 885-913. DOI: 10.1002/smj.1952
94. Westphal JD, Milton LP. 2000. How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 366-398. DOI: 10.2307/2667075
95. Westphal JD, Seidel ML, Stewart KJ. 2001. Second-order imitation: Uncovering latent effects of board network ties. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 717-747. DOI: 10.2307/3094829
96. Williams S, Schaefer A. 2013. Small and medium-sized enterprises and sustainability: Managers' values and engagement with environmental and climate change issues. Business Strategy and the Environment 22: 173-186. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1740
97. Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza HJ. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisitions, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal 22: 587-613. DOI: 10.1002/smj.183
98. Zaheer A, Bell GG. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal 26: 809-825. DOI: 10.1002/smj.482
99. Zahra SA., Filatotchev I. 2004. Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies 41: 885-897. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00458.x
100. Zahra SA, Filatotchev I, Wright M. 2009. How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing 24: 248-260.