Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals' reporting practices

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-15

  Kolk, Ans ^a  

^a Business School   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Corporate governance; Corporate social responsibility; Fortune Global 250; Multinationals; Reporting; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

COMPLIANCE; CORPORATE STRATEGY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 38749122475     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.511     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aaronson SA. 2002. How the Europeans got a head start on policies to promote global corporate responsibility. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9(4): 356-367.
2. Aguilera RV, Jackson G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review 28(3): 447-465.
3. Aventis. 2004. 2003 Sustainability Report. Valuing the Future. Strasbourg.
4. Ball A, Owen DL, Gray R. 2000. External transparency or internal capture? The role of third-party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment 9(1): 1-23.
5. Bedicks HB, Arruda MC. 2005. Business ethics and corporate governance in Latin America. Business and Society 44(2): 218-228.
6. Berthelot S, Cormier D, Magnan M. 2003. Environmental disclosure research: review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature 22: 1-44.
7. BP. 2004. Sustainability Report 2003. Defining our Path. London.
8. Buysse K, Verbeke A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24: 453-470.
9. Carroll AB. 1999. Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society 38(3): 268-295.
10. Clarkson M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92-117.
11. Daily CM, Dalton DR, Cannella AA Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review 28(3): 371-382.
12. Dalton DR, Dalton CM. 2005. Spotlight on corporate governance. Business Horizons 48: 95-99.
13. Demise N. 2005. Business ethics and corporate governance in Japan. Business and Society 44(2): 211-217.
14. Dierkes M, Antal AB. 1985. The usefulness and use of social reporting information. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(1): 29-34.
15. Donaldson T, Preston LE. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91.
16. Enel. 2004. Sustainability Report 2003. Economic, Environmental and Social Responsibility. Energy in Tune with You. Rome.
17. Ford. 2004. 2003/2004 Corporate Citizenship Report. Our Principles, Progress and Performance. Connecting with Society. Dearborn, MI.
18. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2002. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. GRI: Boston, MA.
19. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). 2004. Corporate Responsibility Report 2003. Making a Difference Every Day. GSK: Brentford.
20. Gray R, Owen D, Maunders K. 1988. Corporate social reporting: emerging trends in accountability and the social contract. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1(1): 6-20.
21. Halme M, Huse M. 1997. The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management 13(2): 137-157.
22. HP. 2004. 2004 Global Citizenship Report. Palo Alto, CA.
23. International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN). 2003. Report of the Corporate Governance Principles Review Committee. ICGN Statement on Global Corporate Governance Principles.
24. Jones TM, Wicks AC, Freeman RE. 2002. Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. In The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics, Bowie NE (ed.). Blackwell: Malden; 19-37.
25. Kimber D, Lipton P. 2005. Corporate governance and business ethics in the Asia-Pacific region. Business and Society 44(2): 178-210.
26. Kolk A. 2003. Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(5): 279-291.
27. Kolk A. 2005a. Social and environmental accounting. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management Accounting (2nd edn), Clubb C (ed.). Blackwell: Malden; 393-398.
28. Kolk A. 2005b. Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: convergence or divergence? Management International Review 45(1) special issue: 145-166.
29. Kolk A. 2005c. Sustainability reporting. VBA Journal 21(3): 34-42.
30. Kolk A, Walhain S, van de Wateringen S. 2001. Environmental reporting by the Fortune Global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector. Business Strategy and the Environment 10(1): 15-28.
31. KPMG. 2002. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2002. De Meern.
32. KPMG. 2005. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005. Amsterdam.
33. Livesey SM, Kearins K. 2002. Transparent and caring corporations? A study of sustainability reports by the Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organization and Environment 15(3): 233-258.
34. Luo Y. 2005. Corporate governance and accountability in multinational enterprises: concepts and agenda. Journal of International Management 11: 1-18.
35. Maignan I, Ralston DA. 2002. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses' self-representations. Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 497-514.
36. Margolis JD, Walsh JP. 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 268-305.
37. Marubeni. 2004. CSR Report 2004. Tokyo.
38. Monks RAG, Minow N. 2004. Corporate Governance (3rd edn). Blackwell: Oxford.
39. Novartis. 2004. Annual Report 2003. Basel.
40. OECD. 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris.
41. Owen DL, Swift TA, Humphrey C, Bowerman M. 2000. The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review 9(1): 81-98.
42. Power M. 1991. Auditing and environmental expertise: between protest and professionalisation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4(3): 30-42.
43. Roche. 2004. Sustainability Report 2003. Basel.
44. Rossouw GJ. 2005a. Business ethics and corporate governance: a global survey. Business and Society 44(1): 32-39.
45. Rossouw GJ. 2005b. Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business and Society 44(1): 94-106.
46. Ryan LV. 2005. Corporate governance and business ethics in North America: the state of the art. Business and Society 44(1): 40-73.
47. Shell. 2004. The Shell Report 2003. Meeting the Energy Challenge - Our Progress in Contributing to Sustainable Development. The Hague.
48. Sherman WR, Steingard DS, Fitzgibbons DE. 2002. Sustainable stakeholder accounting beyond complementarity and towards integration in environmental accounting. In Research in Corporate Sustainability. The Evolving Theory and Practice of Organizations in the Natural Environment, Sharma S, Starik M (eds). Elgar: Cheltenham; 257-294.
49. Shleifer A, Vishny RW. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance LII(2): 737-783.
50. Smith JA. 2004. Mandatory and Voluntary Environmental Disclosure in a Time of Crisis in Corporate Governance: a Perfect Storm? 33rd Conference on Environmental Law, Keystone, CO.
51. Sony. 2004. CSR Report 2004. Tokyo.
52. Standards and Poor's, SustainAbility, UNEP. 2004. Risk and Opportunity. Best Practice in Non-Financial Reporting. London.
53. Tepco. 2004. Tepco Sustainability Report 2004. The Earth, People and Energy. Tokyo.
54. Toyota Motor. 2004. Environmental and Social Report 2004. Toyota.
55. Tschopp, DJ. 2005. Corporate social responsibility: a comparison between the United States and the European Union. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12: 55-59.
56. Welford R. 2005a. Corporate governance in Asia: part 1. CSR Asia Weekly 1(37): 1, 8-12.
57. Welford R. 2005b. Corporate governance in Asia: part 2. CSR Asia Weekly 1(38): 1, 6-9.
58. Whetten DA, Rands GP, Godfrey P. 2002. What are the responsibilities of business to society? In Handbook of Strategy and Management, Pettigrew AM, Thomas H, Whittington R (eds). Sage: London; 373-408.
59. Wieland J. 2005. Corporate governance, values management, and standards: a European perspective. Business and Society 44(1): 74-93.
60. Zambon S, Del Bello A. 2005. Towards a stakeholder responsible approach: the constructive role of reporting. Corporate Governance. The International Journal of Business in Society 5(2): 130-141.