There is another choice: an exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 719-752

  Yin, Xinying ^a   Buck, Gayle A ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinese secondary science; Formative assessment; Teacher professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941995252     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-014-9572-5     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abell, S. K., & Volkmann, M. J. (2006). Seamless assessment in science: A guide for elementary and middle school teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Aschbacher, P., & Alonzo, A. (2006). Examining the utility of elementary science notebooks for formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment,11, 179–203.
3. Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the zone of proximal development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education,14, 23–48. doi:10.1023/A:1022999406564.
4. Bell, B. (2007). Classroom assessment of science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 965–1006). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001a). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001b). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education,85, 536–553. doi:10.1002/sce.1022.
7. Berry, R. (2011). Educational assessment in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (Vol. 14, pp. 49–61). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0729-0_4.
8. Black, P. (2013). Pedagogy in theory and in practice: Formative and summative assessments in classrooms and in systems. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy. (Kindle edition). Netherland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6668-6_11.
9. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,80, 139–148.
11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,5, 7–74.
12. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Changing teaching through formative assessment: Research and practice. In Center for Educational Research and Innovation (Ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 223–240). Paris: OECD.
13. Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,16, 347–363.
14. Buck, G. A., & Trauth-Nare, A. E. (2009). Preparing teachers to make the formative assessment process integral to science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education,20, 475–494. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y.
15. Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Carlson, B., & Chen, Z. (2013, June 7). You thought the SAT was bad? Meet the gaokao. Retrieved July 05, 2013, from http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/china/130607/china-gaokao-exam.
17. Center for Educational Research and Innovation. (2008). Assessment for learning, formative assessment. Paper presented at OECD/CERI International conference: Learning in the 21st century: research, innovation and policy, Paris, France.
18. Chen, B. (2010). Stratification of teachers’ status and the basis for the organizational system. Chinese Education and Society,43, 49–59. doi:10.2753/CED1061-1932430405.
19. Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education,28, 1315–1346. doi:10.1080/09500690600621100.
20. Coffey, J. E., Sato, M., & Thibeault, M. D. (2005). Classroom assessment up close—and personal. Teacher Development,9, 169–184. doi:10.1080/13664530500200246.
21. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Creswell, J., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice,39, 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
23. Ding, B. (2006). Assessment for learning: Meaning, methods and rationale. Comparative Education Review,189, 1–6. (in Chinese).
24. Feldman, A. (1996). Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33, 513–540. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<513:AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-U.
25. Feldman, A., & Capobianco, B. M. (2008). Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology,17, 82–99. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9084-0.
26. Furtak, E. M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2008). Making students’ thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An analysis of formative assessment prompts. Science Education,92, 799–824. doi:10.1002/sce.20270.
27. Gao, L. (1998). Cultural context of school science teaching and learning in the People’s Republic of China. Science Education,82, 1–13. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199801)82:1<1:AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-L.
28. Gao, L. (2007). Assessment reform in China: A respond to the international trend in the new century. Retrieved from http://xypj.cersp.com/GLB/LUNWEN/200701/3223.html.
29. Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P.R. China: Identification and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Science Education,24, 61–79. doi:10.1080/09500690110066926.
30. Geelan, D. R., Wildy, H., William, L., & Wallace, J. (2004). Teaching for understanding and/or teaching for the examination in high school physics. International Journal of Science Education,26, 447–462. doi:10.1080/0950069032000097398.
31. Guba, E. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in education evaluation (CSE monograph series in evaluation no. 8). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
32. Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning—Tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal,16, 207–223. doi:10.1080/09585170500136093.
33. Harvard University. (2010). A historic year for Harvard admission. Retrieved July 05, 2013, from http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2010/04/a-historic-year-for-harvard-admissions/.
34. Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan,80, 140–145.
35. Heron, P., & Reason, H. (2002). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 179–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2005). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: A case-study of a whole-school approach. The Curriculum Journal,16, 193–206. doi:10.1080/09585170500136044.
37. Leat, D., & Nichols, A. (2000). Brains on the table: Diagnostic and formative assessment through observation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice,7, 103–121. doi:10.1080/713613327.
38. Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 25–41). Hong Kong: CERC/ACER.
39. Lee-Hang, D., & Bell, B. (2013). Formative assessment as a cultural practice: The use of written formative assessment in Samoan science classrooms. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy. (Kindle edition). Netherland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6668-6_14.
40. Ma, H. (2013). Science teachers’ understandings of the college entrance examination in a climate of national curriculum reform in China. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy. (Kindle edition). Netherland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6668-6_10.
41. Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education,21, 133–149. doi:10.1080/02671520600615638.
42. McMillan, J. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom decision-making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22, 34–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x.
43. Ministry of Education. (2001). Guidelines for Curriculum Reform in Basic Education (experimental draft). Government document, BMOE No 17(2001); June 7, 2001 (in Chinese).
44. Ministry of Education. (2003a). A guide for the reform in junior secondary graduation test and senior secondary enrolment system in national experimental regions on new curriculum. Government document, BMOE No 66(2003); October 8, 2003 (in Chinese).
45. Ministry of Education. (2003b). The curriculum scheme of general senior secondary schools (pp. 4–5). Beijing: Peoples’ Educational Press. (in Chinese).
46. Ministry of Education. (2013). Statistics of national college entrance exam. Retrieved July 05, 2013 from http://edu.people.com.cn/n/2013/0503/c116076-21359059.html (in Chinese).
47. Ministry of Education of China (MOE). (2010). Blueprint for medium and long-term national education reform and development (2010–2020). Retrieved January 12, 2011, from http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-07/29/content_1667143.htm (in Chinese).
48. National Research Council [NRC]. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. Nieswandt, M., & Bellomo, K. (2009). Written extended-response questions as classroom assessment tools for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46, 333–356. doi:10.1002/tea.20271.
50. Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,45, 497–523. doi:10.1002/tea.20229.
51. Paris, S. G., Lawton, T., Turner, J., & Roth, J. (1991). A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher,20, 12–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X020005012.
52. Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students’ multiple words: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly,22, 224–250. doi:10.1525/aeq.1991.22.3.05x1051k.
53. Pine, G. J. (2009). Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
55. Ross, H., & Wang, Y. (2010). Guest editors’ introduction: The College Entrance Examination in China: An overview of its social-cultural foundations, existing problems, and consequences. Chinese Education and Society,43, 3–11. doi:10.2753/CED1061-1932430400.
56. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science,18, 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
57. Sato, M., Coffey, J., & Moorthy, S. (2005). Two teachers making assessment for learning their own. Curriculum Journal,16, 177–191. doi:10.1080/09585170500135996.
58. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher,29, 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004.
59. The State Council of China (SCC). (2001). Resolution about basic education curriculum reform and development. Retrieved January 17, 2010, from http://www.edu.cn/20010907/3000665.shtml (in Chinese).
60. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify a theory. British Educational Research Journal,27, 615–631. doi:10.1080/01411920120095780.
61. Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context. American Psychologist,57, 89–99. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.89.
62. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,11, 49–65. doi:10.1080/0969594042000208994.
63. Zeng, K. (1999). Dragon gate: Competitive examinations and their consequences. New York, NY: Cassell & Continuum.
64. Zhang, B., Krajcik, J. S., Sutherland, L. M., Wang, L., Wu, J., & Qian, Y. (2003). Opportunities and challenges of China’s inquiry-based education reform in middle and high schools: Perspectives of science teachers and teacher educators. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,1, 477–503. doi:10.1007/s10763-005-1517-8.
65. Zhong, Q. (2012). Classroom assessment and development of teachers’ accomplishment of classroom assessment. Research of Modern Basic Education,5, 111–115. (in Chinese).