Pedagogy in theory and in practice: Formative and summative assessments in classrooms and in systems

Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 207-229

  Black, Paul ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891837824     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6668-6_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.
2. Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic thinking: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.
3. Alexander, R. (2008). Essays in pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.
4. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685-730.
5. ARG: Assessment Reform Group. (2006). The role of teachers in assessment of learning. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
6. Baird, J.-A., Black, P., Beguin, A., Pollitt, A., & Stanley, G. (2011). The reliability programme: Final report of the technical advisory group. Coventry: Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (OFQUAL). Retrieved from www.ofqual.gov. uk/downloads/category/193-reliability-compendium
7. Berry, R., & Adamson, B. (Eds.). (2011). Assessment Reform in Education. New York: Springer.
8. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001a). Feedback in questioning and marking: The science teacher's role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 82(301), 55-56.
9. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001b). Self- and peer-assessment and taking responsibility: The science student's role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83(302), 43-49.
10. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2004). Science inside the black box. London: GL Assessment.
11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
12. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Lessons from around the world: How policies, politics and cultures constrain and afford assessment practices. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 249-261.
13. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Large-scale assessment systems: Design principles drawn from international comparisons. Measurement, 1(5), 1-53.
14. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31.
15. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning-Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University.
16. Black, P., Harrison, C., Osborne, J., & Duschl, R. (2004). Assessment of science learning 14-19. London: The Royal Society.
17. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, M., & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers' summative assessments. Assessment in Education, 17(2), 215-232.
18. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, M., & Serret, N. (2011a). Can teachers' summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education, 18(4), 450-469.
19. Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S.-Y. (2011b). Roadmaps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(2-3), 71-123.
20. Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Bassett, P., & Chowne, A. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group-work on pupil-pupil and teacher-pupil interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 750-765.
21. Boyd, B., & Hayward, L. (2010). Exploring assessment for accountability. Glasgow: Universities of Strathclyde and Glasgow.
22. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). The use of teacher judgment for summative assessment in the United States: Weighed in the balance and (often) found wanting. Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Educational Assessment. Retrieved from http://oucea.education.ox.ac.uk/events/teacherjudgment-seminar/papers-2
23. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton for Harvard University.
24. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 1-14.
25. Colbert, P., Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski. V. (2011). A systems level approach to building sustainable assessment cultures: Moderation, quality task design and dependability of judgment. Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Educational Assessment. Retrieved from http://oucea.education. ox.ac.uk/events/teacher-judgment-seminar/papers-2
26. Crooks, T. J., Kane, M. Y., & Cohen, A. S. (1996). Threats to the valid use of assessments. Assessment in Education, 3(3), 265-285.
27. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology.
28. E. U. Council of Ministers. (2010). Assessment of key competences: Draft Background Paper for the Belgian Presidency meeting for Directors-General for school education. Brussels: E. U.
29. Fairbrother, R. (2008). The validity of key stage 2 science tests. School Science Review, 89(329), 107-114.
30. Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of hope. New York: Continuum.
31. Gardner, J. (2007). Is teaching a 'partial' profession? Making the grade. Journal of the Institute of Educational Assessors, (Summer), 18-21.
32. Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., & Stobart, G. (2011). Engaging and empowering teachers in innovative assessment practice. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education (pp. 105-120). New York: Springer.
33. Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (1999). Pedagogy in the secondary school. In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 68-97). London: Paul Chapman.
34. Harlen, W. (2005). Trusting teachers' judgement: Research evidence of the reliability and validity of teachers' assessment used for summative purposes. Research Papers in Education, 20(3), 245-270.
35. Harrison, C., & Howard, S. (2009). Inside the primary black box. London: GL Assessment.
36. Hodgen, J., & Marshall, B. (2005). Assessment for learning in mathematics and English: Contrasts and resemblances. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 153-176.
37. Hutchinson, C., & Hayward, L. (2005). The journey so far: Assessment for learning in Scotland. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 225-248.
38. Johnson, S. (2011). A focus on teacher assessment reliability in GCSE and GCE. Coventry: Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. Retrieved from www.ofqual.gov. uk/downloads/category/193-reliability-compendium
39. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A metaanalysis. Retrieved from http://www.clcrc.com/pages/cl-methods.html
40. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
41. Koretz, D. (1998). Large scale portfolio assessments in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education, 5(3), 309-334.
42. Leckie, G. B., & Goldstein, H. (2011). A note on 'The limitations of using school league tables to inform school choice'. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 174(3), 833-836.
43. Mansell, W., James, M., & Assessment Reform Group. (2009). Assessment in schools: Fit for purpose? A commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
44. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359-377.
45. Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 85-102.
46. Shapley, K. S., & Bush, M. J. (1999). Developing a valid and reliable portfolio assessment in the primary grades: Building on practical experience. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(2), 111-132.
47. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 61-71). London: Chapman.
48. Stanley, G., MacCann, R., Gardner, J., Reynolds, L., & Wild, I. (2009). Review of teacher assessment: What works best and issues for development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Centre for Educational Development.
49. Watkins, P., & Mortimore, P. (1999). Pedagogy: What do we know? In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 1-19). London: Paul Chapman.
50. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49-65.
51. Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.