The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work - An investigation and review

British Dental Journal

Volumn 185, Issue 11-12, 1998, Pages 580-585

  Carrotte, P V ^a   Johnson, A ^a   Winstanley, R B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TOOTH CROWN;

CROWNS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTURE, PARTIAL; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY);

EID: 0032512145     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809870     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Carrotte P V, Winstanley R B, Green J R. A study of the quality of impressions for anterior crowns received at a commercial laboratory. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 235-240.
2. Winstanley R B, Carrotte P V, Johnson A. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges received at commercial dental laboratories. Br Dent J 1997; 183: 209-213.
3. Ödman P A, Jemt T M. Accuracy of impression materials in a semi-clinical model. Dent Materials 1988; 4:64-67.
4. Saunders W P, Sharkey S W, Smith G Mc R, Taylor W G. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material. J Dent 1991; 19:283-289.
5. Quick D C, Holtan J R, Ross G K. Use of a scanning laser three-dimensional digitizer to evaluate dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:229-235.
6. Davis R D, Schwartz R S, Hilton T. Marginal adaptation of castings made with dual-arch and custom trays. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 5:253-254.
7. Syu J Z, Byrne G, Laub L W, Land M F. Influence of finish line geometry on the fit of crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6:25-30.
8. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials. Scand J Dent Res 1989; 97:375-379.
9. Wassell R W, Abuasi H A. Laboratory assessment of impression accuracy by clinical simulation. J Dent 1992; 20:108-114.
10. Shillingburg H T, Hobo S, Whitsett L D. Fundamentals affixed prosthodontics. Chapter 11. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., 1978.
11. Shillingburg H T, Hobo S, Whitsett L D, Jacobi R, Brackett S E. Fundamentals affixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chapter 17. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., 1997.
12. Shillingburg H T, Hatch R A, Keenan M P, Hemphill M W. Impression materials and techniques used for cast restorations in eight states. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100:696-699.
13. Tjan AHL, Whang S B, Miller G D. Why a rigid impression tray is so important to the putty wash silicone impression method. J Can Dent Assoc 1981; 9:53-58.
14. Gordon G E, Johnson G H, Drennon D G. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:12-15.
15. Mitchell J V, Damele J J. Influence of tray design upon elastic impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1970; 23:51-57.
16. Hansson O, Eklund J. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays. Swed Dent J 1984; 8:81-95.
17. Heartwell C M, Modjeski P J, Mullins E E, Strader K H. Comparison of impressions made in perforated and non-perforated rimlock trays. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27:494-500.
18. Woodward J D, Morris J C, Khan Z. Accuracy of stone casts produced by perforated and nonperforated trays. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53:347-350.
19. Rehberg H J. The impression tray - an important factor in impression precision. Int Dent J 1977; 27:146-153.
20. Bomberg T J, Hatch R A, Hoffman W. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54:170-172.
21. Burton J F, Hood J A A, Plunkett D J, Johnson S S. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions. J Dent 1989; 17:121-123.
22. Saunders W P, Sharkey S W, Smith G Mc R, Taylor W G. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material. J Dent 1992; 20:189-192.
23. Wassell R W, Ibbetson R J. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 748-757.
24. Valderhaug J, Fløystrand F. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52:514-517.
25. Walters R A, Spurrier S. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:277-281.
26. Fehling A W, Hesby R A, Pellau G B. Dimensional stability of autopolymerising acrylic resin impression trays. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 592-597.
27. Pagniano R P, Scheid R C, Clowson G B. Stability of acrylic resins used in the fabrication of custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47:279-283.
28. Goldfogel M, Harvey W L, Winter D. Dimensional change of acrylic resin tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54:284-286.
29. Eames W B, Sieweke J C. Seven acrylic resins for custom trays and five putty wash systems compared. Oper Dent 1980; 5:162-167.
30. Stackhouse J A. Dimensional change of custom acrylic impression trays. J NJ State Dent Assoc 1976; 47:28-29.
31. Lambert R L. Stability of thermoplastic custom impression trays. Gen Dent 1994; 42:460-462.
32. Pilcher E S, Draughn R A. Evaluation of polycaprolaitone custom tray material. J Prosthodont 1993; 2:174-177.
33. Dixon D L, Breeding L C, Moseley J P. Custom impression trays. Part II: Removal forces. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:316-318.
34. Moseley J P, Dixon D L, Breeding L C. Custom impression trays. Part III: A stress distribution model. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:532-538.
35. Ansari I H. Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:569-571.
36. Gottlieb M. Accurate dies and well-fitting crowns using three-in-one allplastic impression trays. Dent Econ 1996; 86:102-103.
37. Kaplowitz G J. Making impressions in just 90 seconds. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1530.
38. Kaplowitz G J. Trouble-shooting - dual arch impressions. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:234-235.
39. Douglas G. The cast restoration - why is it high? J Prosthet Dent 1975; 34: 491-495.
40. Davis R D, Schwartz R S. Dual-arch and custom-tray impression accuracy. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 4:89-92.
41. Davis R D, Schwartz R S, Hilton T. Marginal adaptation of castings made with dual-arch and custom trays. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 5:253-254.
42. Christensen G J. Now is the time to change to custom impression trays. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125:619-620.