Dimeric interactions and complex formation using direct coevolutionary couplings

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Dos Santos, Ricardo N ^a,b   Morcos, Faruck ^a,d   Jana, Biman ^c   Andricopulo, Adriano D ^b   Onuchic, José N ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (India)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIMERIZATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIMERIZATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 84941010317     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep13652     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Holmes, K. C., Popp, D., Gebhard, W. & Kabsch, W. Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature 347, 44-49 (1990).
2. Reisler, E. Actin molecular structure and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 5, 41-47 (1993).
3. Dominguez, R. & Holmes, K. C. Actin structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys 40, 169-186 (2011).
4. Caudron, N., Arnal, I., Buhler, E., Job, D. & Valiron, O. Microtubule nucleation from stable tubulin oligomers. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 50973-50979 (2002).
5. Bermudes, D., Hinkle, G. & Margulis, L. Do prokaryotes contain microtubules? Microbiol. Rev. 58, 387-400 (1994).
6. Bieniossek, C. et al. The molecular architecture of the metalloprotease FtsH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3066-3071 (2006).
7. Langklotz, S., Baumann, U. & Narberhaus, F. Structure and function of the bacterial AAA protease FtsH. Bba-Mol. Cell. Res. 1823, 40-48 (2012).
8. Lee, K. A. Dimeric transcription factor families: it takes two to tango but who decides on partners and the venue? J. Cell. Sci. 103 (Pt 1), 9-14 (1992).
9. Klemm, J. D., Schreiber, S. L. & Crabtree, G. R. Dimerization as a regulatory mechanism in signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16, 569-592 (1998).
10. Ali, M. H. & Imperiali, B. Protein oligomerization: How and why. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 13, 5013-5020 (2005).
11. Matthews, J. M. in Protein Dimerization and Oligomerization in Biology (ed. Matthews, J. M.) Ch. 1, 1-18 (Springer New York, 2012).
12. Ispolatov, I., Yuryev, A., Mazo, I. & Maslov, S. Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein-protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 3629-3635 (2005).
13. Morcos, F., Hwa, T., Onuchic, J. N. & Weigt, M. in Protein Structure Prediction, Methods in Molecular Biology 3rd ed Vol. 1137 (ed. Kihara, D.) Ch. 5, 55-70 (Humana Press, 2014).
14. Ekeberg, M., Lovkvist, C., Lan, Y. H., Weigt, M. & Aurell, E. Improved contact prediction in proteins: Using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys. Rev. E 87 (2013).
15. Kamisetty, H., Ovchinnikov, S. & Baker, D. Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence-and structure-rich era. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15674-15679 (2013).
16. Lockless, S. W. & Ranganathan, R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 286, 295-299 (1999).
17. Liu, Z., Chen, J. & Thirumalai, D. On the accuracy of inferring energetic coupling between distant sites in protein families from evolutionary imprints: Illustrations using lattice model. Proteins Struct. Func. Bioinf 77, 823-831 (2009).
18. Dima, R. & Thirumalai, D. Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis. Protein Sci. 15, 258-268 (2006).
19. Sulkowska, J. I., Morcos, F., Weigt, M., Hwa, T. & Onuchic, J. N. Genomics-aided structure prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10340-10345 (2012).
20. Marks, D. S. et al. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS ONE 6, e28766 (2011).
21. Hopf, T. A. et al. Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 149, 1607-1621 (2012).
22. Morcos, F. et al. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, E1293-1301 (2011).
23. Taylor, W. R., Jones, D. T. & Sadowski, M. I. Protein topology from predicted residue contacts. Protein Sci. 21, 299-305 (2012).
24. Kloczkowski, A. et al. Distance matrix-based approach to protein structure prediction. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 10, 67-81 (2009).
25. Wu, D., Cui, F., Jernigan, R. & Wu, Z. PIDD: database for Protein Inter-atomic Distance Distributions. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D202-207 (2007).
26. Halabi, N., Rivoire, O., Leibler, S. & Ranganathan, R. Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 138, 774-786 (2009).
27. Morcos, F., Jana, B., Hwa, T. & Onuchic, J. N. Coevolutionary signals across protein lineages help capture multiple protein conformations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20533-20538 (2013).
28. Weigt, M., White, R. A., Szurmant, H., Hoch, J. A. & Hwa, T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 67-72 (2009).
29. Schug, A., Weigt, M., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T. & Szurmant, H. High-resolution protein complexes from integrating genomic information with molecular simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 22124-22129 (2009).
30. Procaccini, A., Lunt, B., Szurmant, H., Hwa, T. & Weigt, M. Dissecting the specificity of protein-protein interaction in bacterial two-component signaling: orphans and crosstalks. PLoS one 6, e19729 (2011).
31. Cheng, R. R., Morcos, F., Levine, H. & Onuchic, J. N. Toward rationally redesigning bacterial two-component signaling systems using coevolutionary information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E563-571 (2014).
32. Tamir, S. et al. Integrated strategy reveals the protein interface between cancer targets Bcl-2 and NAF-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5177-5182 (2014).
33. Jana, B., Morcos, F. & Onuchic, J. N. From structure to function: the convergence of structure based models and co-evolutionary information. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 6496-6507 (2014).
34. Ovchinnikov, S., Kamisetty, H. & Baker, D. Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. Elife 3, e02030 (2014).
35. Pierce, B., Tong, W. & Weng, Z. M-ZDOCK: a grid-based approach for Cn symmetric multimer docking. Bioinformatics 21, 1472-1478 (2005).
36. de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, M. & Bonvin, A. M. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat. Protoc 5, 883-897 (2010).
37. Mukherjee, S. & Zhang, Y. Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination. Structure 19, 955-966 (2011).
38. Kim, S. K. & Jacobson, K. A. Computational prediction of homodimerization of the A3 adenosine receptor. J. Mol. Graph. Model 25, 549-561 (2006).
39. La, D., Kong, M., Hoffman, W., Choi, Y. I. & Kihara, D. Predicting permanent and transient protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 81, 805-818 (2013).
40. Esquivel-Rodriguez, J., Filos-Gonzalez, V., Li, B. & Kihara, D. Pairwise and multimeric protein-protein docking using the LZerD program suite. Methods Mol. Biol. 1137, 209-234 (2014).
41. Zheng, W., Schafer, N. P., Davtyan, A., Papoian, G. A. & Wolynes, P. G. Predictive energy landscapes for protein-protein association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19244-19249 (2012).
42. Miyashita, N., Straub, J. E., Thirumalai, D. & Sugita, Y. Transmembrane structures of amyloid precursor protein dimer predicted by replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3438-3439 (2009).
43. Sgourakis, N. G. & Garcia, A. E. The membrane complex between transducin and dark-state rhodopsin exhibits large-amplitude interface dynamics on the sub-microsecond timescale: insights from all-atom MD simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 161-173 (2010).
44. Sgourakis, N. G., Patel, M. M., Garcia, A. E., Makhatadze, G. I. & McCallum, S. A. Conformational dynamics and structural plasticity play critical roles in the ubiquitin recognition of a UIM domain. J Mol Biol 396, 1128-1144 (2010).
45. Lammert, H., Schug, A. & Onuchic, J. N. Robustness and generalization of structure-based models for protein folding and function. Proteins Struct. Func. Bioinf 77, 881-891 (2009).
46. Morcos, F., Schafer, N. P., Cheng, R. R., Onuchic, J. N. & Wolynes, P. G. Coevolutionary information, protein folding landscapes, and the thermodynamics of natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12408-12413 (2014).
47. Laub, M. T. & Goulian, M. Specificity in two-component signal transduction pathways. Annu Rev Genet 41, 121-145 (2007).
48. Hoch, J. A. Two-component and phosphorelay signal-transduction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3, 165-170 (2000).
49. Fabret, C., Feher, V. A. & Hoch, J. A. Two-component signal transduction in Bacillus subtilis: how one organism sees its world. J. Bacteriol. 181, 1975-1983 (1999).
50. Bachhawat, P., Swapna, G. V., Montelione, G. T. & Stock, A. M. Mechanism of activation for transcription factor PhoB suggested by different modes of dimerization in the inactive and active states. Structure 13, 1353-1363 (2005).
51. King-Scott, J. et al. The structure of a full-length response regulator from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a stabilized threedimensional domain-swapped, activated state. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 37717-37729 (2007).
52. Sola, M., Gomis-Ruth, F. X., Serrano, L., Gonzalez, A. & Coll, M. Three-dimensional crystal structure of the transcription factor PhoB receiver domain. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 675-687 (1999).
53. Baumkotter, F. et al. Amyloid precursor protein dimerization and synaptogenic function depend on copper binding to the growth factor-like domain. J. Neurosci. 34, 11159-11172 (2014).
54. Baulac, S., LaVoie, M. J., Strahle, J., Schlossmacher, M. G. & Xia, W. Dimerization of Parkinson's disease-causing DJ-1 and formation of high molecular weight complexes in human brain. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 27, 236-246 (2004).
55. Tompa, P., Tusnady, G. E., Friedrich, P. & Simon, I. The role of dimerization in prion replication. Biophys. J 82, 1711-1718 (2002).
56. Zheng, W., Schafer, N. P. & Wolynes, P. G. Free energy landscapes for initiation and branching of protein aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20515-20520 (2013).
57. Finn, R. D. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D211-222 (2010).
58. Finn, R. D., Clements, J. & Eddy, S. R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W29-37 (2011).
59. Fraczkiewicz, R. & Braun, W. Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules. J. Comput. Chem. 19, 319-333 (1998).
60. Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242 (2000).
61. Bordoli, L. & Schwede, T. Automated protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL Workspace and the Protein Model Portal. Methods Mol. Biol. 857, 107-136 (2012).
62. Noel, J. K., Whitford, P. C., Sanbonmatsu, K. Y. & Onuchic, J. N. SMOG@ctbp: simplified deployment of structure-based models in GROMACS. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W657-661 (2010).
63. Pronk, S. et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29, 845-854 (2013).