Protein topology from predicted residue contacts

Protein Science

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 299-305

  Taylor, William R ^a   Jones, David T ^b   Sadowski, Michael I ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Correlated mutations; Decoy models; Protein fold recognition; Residue contact prediction

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 84863393203     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baker D, Taylor WR, Ab initio structure prediction. In: Subramanian S, Ed. (2005) Encyclopedia of genetics, genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics, Vol. 7: Bioinformatics. Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp 3245-3251.
2. Cohen FE, Sternberg MJE, Taylor WR (1980) Analysis and prediction of protein b-sheet structures by a combinatorial approach. Nature 285:378-382.
3. Cohen FE, Sternberg MJE, Taylor WR (1982) Analysis and prediction of the packing of a-helices against a β-sheet in the tertiary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 156:821-862. (Pubitemid 12055135)
4. Jones DT (2001) Predicting novel protein folds by using FRAGFOLD. Proteins (Suppl. 5) 45:127-132.
5. Bradley P, Misura KMS, Baker D (2005) Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309:1868-1871. (Pubitemid 41325099)
6. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2005) The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1029-1034. (Pubitemid 40170720)
7. Taylor WR, Bartlett GJ, Chelliah V, Klose D, Lin K, Sheldon T, Jonassen I. (2008) Prediction of protein structure from ideal forms. Proteins 70:1610-1619. (Pubitemid 351304117)
8. Taylor WR, Hollup SM, MacDonald JT, Jonassen I (2009) Probing the "dark matter" of protein fold-space. Structure 17:1244-1252.
9. Taylor WR, Hatrick K (1994) Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng 7: 341-348. (Pubitemid 24063133)
10. Pollock DD, Taylor WR, Goldman N (1999) Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Mol Biol 287:187-198. (Pubitemid 29134806)
11. Bartlett GJ, Taylor WR (2008) Using scores derived from statistical coupling analysis to distinguish correct and incorrect folds in de-novo protein structure prediction. Proteins 71:950-959. (Pubitemid 351430027)
12. Sadowski MI, Maksimiak K, Taylor WR (2011) Direct correlation analysis improves fold recognition. Comput Biol Chem 35:323-332.
13. Taylor WR, Sadowski MI (2011) Structural constraints on the covariance matrix derived from multiple aligned protein sequences. PLoS-one, http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0028265.
14. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2008) Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9:432-441. (Pubitemid 351882084)
15. Jones DT, Buchan WA, Cozzetto D, Pontil M (2011) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse invariance covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638.
16. Jones DT (2000) The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16:404-405.
17. Taylor WR (2002) Protein structure comparison using bipartite graph matching. Mol Cell Proteomics 1: 334-339.
18. Taylor WR (1999) Protein structure alignment using iterated double dynamic programming. Protein Sci 8: 654-665.