Genome architecture: from linear organisation of chromatin to the 3D assembly in the nucleus

Chromosoma

Volumn 125, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 455-469

  Sequeira Mendes, Joana ^a   Gutierrez, Crisanto ^a  

^a CENTRO DE BIOLOGÍA MOLECULAR SEVERO OCHOA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPACER DNA; HETEROCHROMATIN; HISTONE; NUCLEOSOME;

ARABIDOPSIS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DROSOPHILA; ENHANCER REGION; GENE REPRESSION; GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMAN; MAMMAL CELL; NONHUMAN; PROMOTER REGION; REVIEW; TOPOGRAPHY; YEAST; ANIMAL; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOSOME; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DROSOPHILA; GENOME; HETEROCHROMATIN; HISTONES; HUMANS; NUCLEOSOMES; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84940557389     PISSN: 00095915     EISSN: 14320886     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-015-0538-5     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T (2011) Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 21:381–395. doi:10.1038/cr.2011.22
2. Bantignies F et al (2011) Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 144:214–226. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.026
3. Barski A et al (2007) High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129:823–837. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009
4. Belmont AS (2014) Large-scale chromatin organization: the good, the surprising, and the still perplexing. Curr Opin Cell Biol 26:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2013.10.002
5. Berger AB et al (2008) High-resolution statistical mapping reveals gene territories in live yeast. Nat Methods 5:1031–1037. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1266
6. Bernatavichute YV, Zhang X, Cokus S, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE (2008) Genome-wide association of histone H3 lysine nine methylation with CHG DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 3:e3156. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003156
7. Biesinger J, Wang Y, Xie X (2013) Discovering and mapping chromatin states using a tree hidden Markov model. BMC Bioinformatics 14(Suppl 5):S4. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-S5-S4
8. Brown EJ, Bachtrog D (2014) The chromatin landscape of Drosophila: comparisons between species, sexes, and chromosomes. Genome Res 24:1125–1137. doi:10.1101/gr.172155.114
9. Calo E, Wysocka J (2013) Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol Cell 49:825–837. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.038
10. Cheutin T, Cavalli G (2014) Polycomb silencing: from linear chromatin domains to 3D chromosome folding. Curr Opin Genetics Dev 25:30–37. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.016
11. Christophorou MA et al (2014) Citrullination regulates pluripotency and histone H1 binding to chromatin. Nature 507:104–108. doi:10.1038/nature12942
12. Crevillén P, Sonmez C, Wu Z, Dean C (2012) A gene loop containing the floral repressor FLC is disrupted in the early phase of vernalization. EMBO J 32:140–148. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.324
13. Czermin B, Schotta G, Hülsmann BB, Brehm A, Becker PB, Reuter G, Imhof A (2001) Physical and functional association of SU(VAR)3-9 and HDAC1 in Drosophila. EMBO Rep 2:915–919. doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve210
14. de Wit E, de Laat W (2012) A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev 26:11–24. doi:10.1101/gad.179804.111
15. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002) Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295:1306–1311. doi:10.1126/science.1067799
16. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA (2013) Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nature Rev Genet 14:390–403. doi:10.1038/nrg3454
17. DeMare LE, Leng J, Cotney J, Reilly SK, Yin J, Sarro R, Noonan JP (2013) The genomic landscape of cohesin-associated chromatin interactions. Genome Res 23:1224–1234. doi:10.1101/gr.156570.113
18. Dixon JR et al (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485:376–380. doi:10.1038/nature11082
19. Dostie J et al (2006) Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res 16:1299–1309. doi:10.1101/gr.5571506
20. Dowen JM et al (2014) Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes. Cell 159:374–387. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.030
21. Duan Z et al (2010) A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 465:363–367. doi:10.1038/nature08973
22. Ernst J, Kellis M (2010) Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome. Nat Biotechnol 28:817–825. doi:10.1038/nbt.1662
23. Ernst J, Kellis M (2012) ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods 9:215–216. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1906
24. Ernst J, Kellis M (2013) Interplay between chromatin state, regulator binding, and regulatory motifs in six human cell types. Genome Res 23:1142–1154. doi:10.1101/gr.144840.112
25. Ernst J et al (2011) Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473:43–49. doi:10.1038/nature09906
26. Feng S, Jacobsen SE (2011) Epigenetic modifications in plants: an evolutionary perspective. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:179–186. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.12.002
27. Feng S, Cokus SJ, Schubert V, Zhai J, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE (2014) Genome-wide Hi-C analyses in wild-type and mutants reveal high-resolution chromatin interactions in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 55:694–707. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.07.008
28. Filion GJ et al (2010) Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143:212–224. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.009
29. Fischer A, Hofmann I, Naumann K, Reuter G (2006) Heterochromatin proteins and the control of heterochromatic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol 163:358–368. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2005.10.015
30. Fullwood MJ et al (2009) An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462:58–64. doi:10.1038/nature08497
31. Grob S, Schmid MW, Luedtke NW, Wicker T, Grossniklaus U (2013) Characterization of chromosomal architecture in Arabidopsis by chromosome conformation capture. Genome Biol 14:R129. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r129
32. Grob S, Schmid MW, Grossniklaus U (2014) Hi-C analysis in Arabidopsis identifies the KNOT, a structure with similarities to the flamenco locus of Drosophila. Mol Cell 55:678–693. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.07.009
33. Gu SG, Fire A (2010) Partitioning the C. elegans genome by nucleosome modification, occupancy, and positioning. Chromosoma 119:73–87. doi:10.1007/s00412-009-0235-3
34. Guelen L et al (2008) Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453:948–951. doi:10.1038/nature06947
35. Gurard-Levin ZA, Almouzni G (2014) Histone modifications and a choice of variant: a language that helps the genome express itself. F1000Prime Rep 6:76 doi:10.12703/P6-76
36. Hagège H et al (2007) Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR). Nat Protoc 2:1722–1733. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.243
37. Handoko L et al (2011) CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 43:630–638. doi:10.1038/ng.857
38. Happel N, Doenecke D (2009) Histone H1 and its isoforms: contribution to chromatin structure and function. Gene 431:1–12
39. Heitz E (1928) Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrb Wiss Botanik 69:762–818
40. Henikoff S, Shilatifard A (2011) Histone modification: cause or cog? Trends Genet 27:389–396. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.06.006
41. Ho JWK et al (2014) Comparative analysis of metazoan chromatin organization. Nature 512:449–452. doi:10.1038/nature13415
42. Hon G, Ren B, Wang W (2008) ChromaSig: a probabilistic approach to finding common chromatin signatures in the human genome. PLoS Computat Biol 4:e1000201. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000201
43. Horike S-i, Cai S, Miyano M, Cheng J-F, Kohwi-Shigematsu T (2005) Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nature Genet 37:31–40. doi:10.1038/ng1491
44. Johnson L, Cao X, Jacobsen S (2002) Interplay between two epigenetic marks. DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr Biol 12:1360–1367
45. Kharchenko PV et al (2010) Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471:480–485. doi:10.1038/nature09725
46. Kouzarides T (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128:693–705. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005
47. Larson JL, Yuan G-C (2010) Epigenetic domains found in mouse embryonic stem cells via a hidden Markov model. BMC Bioinformatics 11:557. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-557
48. Li G et al (2012) Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148:84–98. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.014
49. Lieberman-Aiden E et al (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326:289–293. doi:10.1126/science.1181369
50. Liu CL, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Schreiber SL (2005) PLOS Biology: single-nucleosome mapping of histone modifications in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 3:e328. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030328
51. Liu T et al (2011) Broad chromosomal domains of histone modification patterns in C. elegans. Genome Res 21:227–236
52. Loomis RJ et al (2009) Chromatin binding of SRp20 and ASF/SF2 and dissociation from mitotic chromosomes is modulated by histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation. Mol Cell 33:450–461. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.003
53. Louwers M, Splinter E, van Driel R, de Laat W, Stam M (2009) Studying physical chromatin interactions in plants using chromosome conformation capture (3C). Nat Protoc 4:1216–1229. doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.113
54. Maze I, Noh K-M, Soshnev AA, Allis CD (2014) Every amino acid matters: essential contributions of histone variants to mammalian development and disease. Nature Rev Genet 15:259–271. doi:10.1038/nrg3673
55. McDaniell R et al (2010) Heritable individual-specific and allele-specific chromatin signatures in humans. Science 328:235–239. doi:10.1126/science.1184655
56. Mikkelsen TS et al (2007) Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448:553–560. doi:10.1038/nature06008
57. Moissiard G et al (2012) MORC family ATPases required for heterochromatin condensation and gene silencing. Science 336:1448–1451. doi:10.1126/science.1221472
58. Nagano T et al (2013) Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502:59–64. doi:10.1038/nature12593
59. Nora EP et al (2012) Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485:381–385. doi:10.1038/nature11049
60. Ott RW, Chua NH (1990) Enhancer sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana obtained by library transformation of Nicotiana tabacum. Mol Gen Genet 223:169–179
61. Piacentini L, Fanti L, Negri R, Del Vescovo V, Fatica A, Altieri F, Pimpinelli S (2009) Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1a) positively regulates euchromatic gene expression through RNA transcript association and interaction with hnRNPs in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 5:e1000670. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000670
62. Pombo A, Dillon N (2015) Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:245–257. doi:10.1038/nrm3965
63. Pope BD, Gilbert DM (2013) The replication domain model: regulating replicon firing in the context of large-scale chromosome architecture. J Mol Biol 425:4690–4695. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.014
64. Rao SSP et al (2014) A 3d map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159:1665–1680. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
65. Riddle NC et al (2011) Plasticity in patterns of histone modifications and chromosomal proteins in Drosophila heterochromatin. Genome Res 21:147–163. doi:10.1101/gr.110098.110
66. RoadmapEpigenomicsConsortium et al (2015) Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518:317–330. doi:10.1038/nature14248
67. Roudier F et al (2011) Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 30:1928–1938. doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.103
68. Ryba T et al (2010) Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res 20:761–770. doi:10.1101/gr.099655.109
69. Saint-Andre V, Batsche E, Rachez C, Muchardt C (2011) Histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation and HP1gamma favor inclusion of alternative exons. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:337–344. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1995
70. Sanyal A, Lajoie BR, Jain G, Dekker J (2012) The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 489:109–113. doi:10.1038/nature11279
71. Sequeira-Mendes J et al (2014) The functional topography of the Arabidopsis genome is organized in a reduced number of linear motifs of chromatin states. Plant Cell 26:2351–2366. doi:10.1105/tpc.114.124578
72. Sexton T et al (2012) Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148:458–472. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010
73. Shu H, Wildhaber T, Siretskiy A, Gruissem W, Hennig L (2012) Distinct modes of DNA accessibility in plant chromatin. Nat Commun 3:1281. doi:10.1038/ncomms2259
74. Shu H et al (2014) Arabidopsis replacement histone variant H3.3 occupies promoters of regulated genes. Genome Biol 15:R62. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r62
75. Simonis M et al (2006) Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nature Genet 38:1348–1354. doi:10.1038/ng1896
76. Smemo S et al (2014) Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3. Nature 507:371–375. doi:10.1038/nature13138
77. Spitz F, Furlong EEM (2012) Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nature Rev Genet 13:613–626. doi:10.1038/nrg3207
78. Splinter E et al (2006) CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the beta-globin locus. Genes Dev 20:2349–2354. doi:10.1101/gad.399506
79. Splinter E et al (2011) The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev 25:1371–1383. doi:10.1101/gad.633311
80. Stroud H, Otero S, Desvoyes B, Ramirez-Parra E, Jacobsen SE, Gutierrez C (2012) Genome-wide analysis of histone H3.1 and H3.3 variants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5370–5375. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203145109
81. Sundaresan V et al (1995) Patterns of gene action in plant development revealed by enhancer trap and gene trap transposable elements. Genes Dev 9:1797–1810
82. Tark-Dame M, Jerabek H, Manders EM, Heermann DW, van Driel R (2014) Depletion of the chromatin looping proteins CTCF and cohesin causes chromatin compaction: insight into chromatin folding by polymer modelling. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003877. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003877
83. Tolhuis B et al (2011) Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet 7:e1001343. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001343
84. Visel A et al (2009) ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457:854–858. doi:10.1038/nature07730
85. Wang C et al (2014) Genome-wide analysis of local chromatin packing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. doi:10.1101/gr.170332.113
86. Williamson I et al (2014) Spatial genome organization: contrasting views from chromosome conformation capture and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Dev 28:2778–2791. doi:10.1101/gad.251694.114
87. Wollmann H, Holec S, Alden K, Clarke ND, Jacques P-É, Berger F (2012) Dynamic deposition of histone variant H3.3 accompanies developmental remodeling of the Arabidopsis transcriptome. PLoS Genet 8:e1002658. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002658
88. Zhang Y et al (2012) Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148:908–921. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.002
89. Zhao Z et al (2006) Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nature Genet 38:1341–1347. doi:10.1038/ng1891
90. Zhou J, Wang X, He K, Charron J-BF, Elling AA, Deng XW (2010) Genome-wide profiling of histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation and dimethylation in Arabidopsis reveals correlation between multiple histone marks and gene expression. Plant Mol Biol 72:585–595. doi:10.1007/s11103-009-9594-7
91. Zuin J et al (2014) Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:996–1001. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317788111