Erratum: Depletion of the Chromatin Looping Proteins CTCF and Cohesin Causes Chromatin Compaction: Insight into Chromatin Folding by Polymer Modelling (PLoS Comput Biol (2014) 10:10 (e1003877) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003877);Depletion of the Chromatin Looping Proteins CTCF and Cohesin Causes Chromatin Compaction: Insight into Chromatin Folding by Polymer Modelling

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Tark Dame, Mariliis ^a   Jerabek, Hansjoerg ^b   Manders, Erik M M ^c,d   Heermann, Dieter W ^b   van Driel, Roel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUT FÜR THEORETISCHE PHYSIK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPACTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; TRANSCRIPTION;

CELL TYPES; CHROMATIN COMPACTION; COHESINS; COMPLEX PATTERN; FOLDINGS; GENES EXPRESSION; INTERPHASE NUCLEUS; KEY ELEMENTS; PHYSICAL CONTACTS; POLYMER MODELS;

PROTEINS;

CARRIER PROTEINS AND BINDING PROTEINS; COHESIN; POLYMER; RAD21 PROTEIN; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CTCF; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CCCTC-BINDING FACTOR; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CHROMATIN; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; RAD21 PROTEIN, HUMAN; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN CONDENSATION; CHROMATIN FOLDING; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME 11Q; CHROMOSOME 1Q; CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION; CHROMOSOME FOLDING; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE MAPPING; GENE SILENCING; GENE SWITCHING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERPHASE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NUCLEOSOME; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DEPLETION; APOPTOSIS; BIOLOGY; CELL CULTURE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

APOPTOSIS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; POLYMERS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 84908352990     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1004716     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Cavalli G, Misteli T, (2013) Functional implications of genome topology. Nature structural & molecular biology 20: 290–299 doi:10.1038/nsmb.2474
2. Gibcus JH, Dekker J, (2013) The Hierarchy of the 3D Genome. Molecular Cell 49: 773–782 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.011
3. Bickmore WA, (2013) The spatial organization of the human genome. Annual review of genomics and human genetics 14: 67–84 doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153515
4. Cremer T, Cremer C, (2001) Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nature reviews Genetics 2: 292–301 doi:10.1038/35066075
5. Cremer T, Cremer M, (2010) Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 2: a003889 doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a003889
6. Pombo A, Branco MR, (2007) Functional organisation of the genome during interphase. Current opinion in genetics & development 17: 451–455 doi:10.1016/j.gde.2007.08.008
7. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, et al. (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485: 376–380 doi:10.1038/nature11082
8. Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, Leblanc B, et al. (2012) Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148: 458–472 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010
9. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, Okamoto I, et al. (2012) Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485: 381–385 doi:10.1038/nature11049
10. Hou C, Li L, Qin ZS, Corces VG, (2012) Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Molecular cell 48: 471–484 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.031
11. Phillips-Cremins JE, Sauria MEG, Sanyal A, Gerasimova TI, Lajoie BR, et al. (2013) Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment. Cell 153: 1281–1295 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053
12. Moindrot B, Audit B, Klous P, Baker A, Thermes C, et al. (2012) 3D chromatin conformation correlates with replication timing and is conserved in resting cells. Nucleic Acids Research 40: 9470–9481 doi:10.1093/nar/gks736
13. Ryba T, Hiratani I, Lu J, Itoh M, Kulik M, et al. (2010) Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome research 20: 761–770 doi:10.1101/gr.099655.109
14. Pope BD, Hiratani I, Gilbert DM, (2010) Domain-wide regulation of DNA replication timing during mammalian development. Chromosome research: an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology 18: 127–136 doi:10.1007/s10577-009-9100-8
15. Pope BD, Gilbert DM, (2013) The replication domain model: regulating replicon firing in the context of large-scale chromosome architecture. Journal of molecular biology 425: 4690–4695 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.014
16. Mateos-Langerak J, Bohn M, De Leeuw W, Giromus O, Manders EMM, et al. (2009) Spatially confined folding of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 3812–3817 doi:10.1073/pnas.0809501106
17. Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, Schoenfelder S, Yaffe E, et al. (2013) Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502: 59–64 doi:10.1038/nature12593
18. Tark-Dame M, Van Driel R, Heermann DW, (2011) Chromatin folding–from biology to polymer models and back. Journal of cell science 124: 839–845 doi:10.1242/jcs.077628
19. Fudenberg G, Mirny LA, (2012) Higher-order chromatin structure: bridging physics and biology. Current opinion in genetics & development 22: 115–124 doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.01.006
20. Huet S, Lavelle C, Ranchon H, Carrivain P, Victor J-M, et al. (2014) Relevance and limitations of crowding, fractal, and polymer models to describe nuclear architecture. International review of cell and molecular biology 307: 443–479 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800046-5.00013-8
21. Rosa A, Zimmer C, (2014) Computational models of large-scale genome architecture. International review of cell and molecular biology 307: 275–349 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800046-5.00009-6
22. Lieberman-Aiden E, Van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, et al. (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science (New York, NY) 326: 289–293 doi:10.1126/science.1181369
23. Mirny LA, (2011) The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome research: an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology 19: 37–51 doi:10.1007/s10577-010-9177-0
24. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA, (2013) Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nature reviews Genetics 14: 390–403 doi:10.1038/nrg3454
25. Bohn M, Heermann DW, (2010) Diffusion-driven looping provides a consistent framework for chromatin organization. PloS one 5: e12218 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012218
26. Heermann DW, Jerabek H, Liu L, Li Y, (2012) A model for the 3D chromatin architecture of pro and eukaryotes. Methods (San Diego, Calif) 58: 307–314 doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.04.010
27. Bohn M, Heermann DW, (2011) Repulsive forces between looping chromosomes induce entropy-driven segregation. PloS one 6: e14428 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014428
28. Heermann DW, (2011) Physical nuclear organization: loops and entropy. Current opinion in cell biology 23: 332–337 doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2011.03.010
29. Dion V, Gasser SM, (2013) Chromatin movement in the maintenance of genome stability. Cell 152: 1355–1364 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.010
30. Jerabek H, Heermann DW, (2012) Expression-dependent folding of interphase chromatin. PloS one 7: e37525 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037525
31. Holwerda SJB, De Laat W, (2013) CTCF: the protein, the binding partners, the binding sites and their chromatin loops. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences 368: 20120369 doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0369
32. Dorsett D, Merkenschlager M, (2013) Cohesin at active genes: a unifying theme for cohesin and gene expression from model organisms to humans. Current opinion in cell biology 25: 327–333 doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2013.02.003
33. Merkenschlager M, Odom DT, (2013) CTCF and cohesin: linking gene regulatory elements with their targets. Cell 152: 1285–1297 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.029
34. Wendt KS, Yoshida K, Itoh T, Bando M, Koch B, et al. (2008) Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature 451: 796–801 doi:10.1038/nature06634
35. Parelho V, Hadjur S, Spivakov M, Leleu M, Sauer S, et al. (2008) Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell 132: 422–433 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.011
36. Zuin J, Dixon JR, Van der Reijden MIJA, Ye Z, Kolovos P, et al. (2014) Cohesin and CTCF Differentially Affect Chromatin Architecture and Gene Expression in Human Cells. PNAS 111: 996–1001.
37. Sofueva S, Yaffe E, Chan W-C, Georgopoulou D, Vietri Rudan M, et al. (2013) Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. The EMBO journal 32: 3119–3129 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.237
38. Seitan VC, Faure AJ, Zhan Y, McCord RP, Lajoie BR, et al. (2013) Cohesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments. Genome research 23: 2066–2077 doi:10.1101/gr.161620.113
39. Nativio R, Wendt KS, Ito Y, Huddleston JE, Uribe-Lewis S, et al. (2009) Cohesin is required for higher-order chromatin conformation at the imprinted IGF2-H19 locus. PLoS genetics 5: e1000739 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000739
40. Hou C, Dale R, Dean A, (2010) Cell type specificity of chromatin organization mediated by CTCF and cohesin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 3651–3656 doi:10.1073/pnas.0912087107
41. Schmidt D, Schwalie PC, Ross-Innes CS, Hurtado A, Brown GD, et al. (2010) A CTCF-independent role for cohesin in tissue-specific transcription. Genome research 20: 578–588 doi:10.1101/gr.100479.109
42. Caron H, Van Schaik B, Van der Mee M, Baas F, Riggins G, et al. (2001) The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science (New York, NY) 291: 1289–1292 doi:10.1126/science.1056794
43. Pope BD, Chandra T, Buckley Q, Hoare M, Ryba T, et al. (2012) Replication-timing boundaries facilitate cell-type and species-specific regulation of a rearranged human chromosome in mouse. Human molecular genetics doi:10.1093/hmg/dds232
44. Goetze S, Mateos-Langerak J, Gierman HJ, De Leeuw W, Giromus O, et al. (2007) The three-dimensional structure of human interphase chromosomes is related to the transcriptome map. Molecular and cellular biology 27: 4475–4487 doi:10.1128/MCB.00208-07
45. Rhee HS, Pugh BF, (2011) Comprehensive Genome-wide Protein-DNA Interactions Detected at Single-Nucleotide Resolution. Cell 147: 1408–1419 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.013
46. Takizawa T, Gudla PR, Guo L, Lockett S, Misteli T, (2008) Allele-specific nuclear positioning of the monoallelically expressed astrocyte marker GFAP. Genes & development 22: 489–498 doi:10.1101/gad.1634608
47. Ferrai C, De Castro IJ, Lavitas L, Chotalia M, Pombo A, (2010) Gene positioning. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 2: a000588 doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000588
48. Handoko L, Xu H, Li G, Ngan CY, Chew E, et al. (2011) CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nature genetics 43: 630–638 doi:10.1038/ng.857
49. Barbieri M, Chotalia M, Fraser J, Lavitas L-M, Dostie J, et al. (2012) Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 16173–16178 doi:10.1073/pnas.1204799109
50. Bancaud A, Lavelle C, Huet S, Ellenberg J, (2012) A fractal model for nuclear organization: current evidence and biological implications. Nucleic acids research 40: 8783–8792 doi:10.1093/nar/gks586
51. Yokota H, Van den Engh G, Hearst JE, Sachs RK, Trask BJ, (1995) Evidence for the organization of chromatin in megabase pair-sized loops arranged along a random walk path in the human G0/G1 interphase nucleus. The Journal of cell biology 130: 1239–1249.
52. Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, Zhan Y, Lajoie BR, et al. (2013) Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science (New York, NY) 342: 948–953 doi:10.1126/science.1236083
53. Langowski J, (2006) Polymer chain models of DNA and chromatin. The European physical journal E, Soft matter 19: 241–249 doi:10.1140/epje/i2005-10067-9
54. Heermann DW, Binder K (2010) Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics. fifth. Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03163-2.
55. Carmesin I, Kremer K, (1988) The Bond Fluctuation Method: A New Effective Algorithm for the Dynamics of Polymers in All Spatial Dimensions. Macromolecules 21: 2819–2823.
56. Deutsch HP, Binder K, (1991) Interdiffusion and self-diffusion in polymer mixtures: A Monte Carlo study. J Chem Phys 94: 2294–2304.