Environment parameter estimation during bilateral telemanipulation

14th Symposium onHaptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment andTeleoperator Systems 2006 - Proceedings

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 301-307

  Misra, Sarthak ^a   Okamura, Allison M ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive control; Environment stiffness and damping; Force feedback; Impedance control; Telemanipulation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REMOTE SENSING;

ENVIRONMENT STIFFNESS; FORCE FEEDBACK; IMPEDANCE CONTROL; TELEMANIPULATION;

TELEMETERING;

EID: 33750954794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. I. Brouwer, J. Ustin, L. Bentley, A. Sherman, N. Dhruv, and F. Tendick. Measuring in vivo animal soft tissue properties for haptic modeling in surgical simulation. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pages 69-74, January 2001.
2. M. B. Colton and J. M. Hollerbach. Identification of nonlinear passive devices for haptic simulations. In First Joint Eurohaptics Conf. and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics Conf. (WHC), pages 363-368, Pisa, Italy, March 2005.
3. S. Cotin, H. Delingette, and N. Ayache. A hybrid elastic model for real-time cutting, deformations, and force feedback for surgery training and simulation. Visual Computer, 16(8):437-452, November 2000.
4. S. P. DiMaio and S. E. Salcudean. Needle insertion modeling and simulation. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 19(5):864-875, October 2003.
5. N. Diolaiti, C. Melchiorri, and S. Stramigioli. Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems. In IEEE/RSJ Int'l. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), volume 3, pages 2538-2543, Sendai, Japan, September 2004.
6. O. Duchemin, P. Maillet, P. Poignet, E. Dombre, and F. Pierrot. A hybrid position/force control approach for identification of deformation models of skin and underlying tissues. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, 52(2): 160-170, February 2005.
7. P. E. Dupont, P. A. Millman, T. M. Schulteis, and R. D. Howe. Automatic identification of environment haptic properties. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(4):392-409, August 1999.
8. D. Erickson, M. Weber, and I. Sharf. Contact stiffness and damping estimation for robotic systems. Int'l. J. Robotics Research, 22(1):41-57, January 2003.
9. G. De Gersem, H. Van Brussel, and J. Vander Sloten. Enhanced haptic sensitivity for soft tissues using teleoperation with shaped impedance reflection. In World Haptics Conf. (WHC), Pisa, Italy, March 2005.
10. B. Hannaford. Design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 5(4):426-434, August 1989.
11. K. Hashtrudi-Zaad and S. E. Salcudean. Adaptive transparent impedance reflecting teleoperation. In IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1369-1374, Minneapolis, USA, April 1996.
12. N. Hogan. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: part i-iii. ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 107(1):1-24, March 1985.
13. T. Hu and J. P. Desai. Characterization of soft-tissue material properties: large deformation analysis. In Second Int'l. Symposium on Medical Simulation (ISMS), pages 28-37, Cambridge, USA, June 2004.
14. H. Kazerooni, T.-I. Tsay, and K. Hollerbach. Controller design framework for telerobotic systems. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology, 1(1):50-62, March 1993.
15. A. E. Kerdok, S. M. Cotin, M. P. Ottensmeyer, A. M. Galea, R. D. Howe, and S. L. Dawson. Truth cube: establishing physical standards for soft tissue simulation. Medical Image Analysis, 7(3):283-291, January 2003.
16. H. Kobayashi and H. Nakamura. A scaled teleoperation. In IEEE Int'l. Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pages 269-274, Tokyo, Japan, September 1992.
17. D. A. Lawrence. Designing teleoperator architectures for transparency. In IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1406-1411, Nice, France, May 1992.
18. M. P. Ottensmeyer, A. E. Kerdok, R. D. Howe, and S. L. Dawson. The effects of testing environment on the viscoelastic properties of soft tissues. In Second Int'l. Symposium on Medical Simulation (ISMS), pages 67-76, Cambridge, USA, June 2004.
19. J. Park, R. Cortesao, and O. Khatib. Robust and adaptive teleoperation for compliant motion tasks. In The 11th Int'l. Conf. on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), pages 513-519, Coimbra, Portugal, June 2003.
20. H. Seraji and R. Colbaugh. Force tracking in impedance control. In IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 499-506, Atlanta, USA, May 1993.
21. A. Sherman, M. C. Cavusoglu, and F. Tendick. Comparison of teleoperator control architectures for palpation task. In Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (IMECE), pages 1261-1268, Orlando, USA, November 2000.
22. K. B. Shimoga. Survey of perceptual feedback issues in dexterous telemanipulation: Part i. finger force feedback. In IEEE Annual Virtual Reality Int'l. Symposium, pages 263-270, Seattle, USA, September 1993.
23. J.-J. E. Slotine and L. Weiping. Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
24. V. Vuskovic, M. Kauer, G. Szekely, and M. Reidy. Realistic force feedback for virtual reality based diagnostic surgery simulators. In IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1592-1598, San Francisco, USA, April 2000.