Example of a micro-adaptive instruction methodology for the improvement of flipped-classrooms and adaptive-learning based on advanced blended-learning tools

Education for Chemical Engineers

Volumn 12, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-11

  Kakosimos, K E ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY AT QATAR   (Qatar)

Author keywords

Articulate storyline; Blended learning; Flipped classroom; Multimedia

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OPERATIONS; FEEDBACK; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ADAPTIVE INSTRUCTION; BLENDED LEARNING; FLIPPED CLASSROOM; MULTIMEDIA; QUALITATIVE EVALUATIONS; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; STORYLINES; TEACHING METHODOLOGIES;

CURRICULA;

EID: 84939611575     PISSN: 17497728     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ece.2015.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Angelo T.A., Cross K.P. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers 1993, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. 2nd ed.
2. Assael M.J., Kakosimos K.E. Can a course on the calculation of the effects of fires, explosions and toxic gas dispersions, be topical, enjoyable and meaningful?. Educ. Chem. Eng. 2010, 5(3):e45-e53.
3. Bonk C.J., Graham C.R. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs 2006, Pfeiffer/John Wiley, distributor, Chichester/San Francisco, CA. 1st ed.
4. Caldwell J.E. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2007, 6(1):9-20.
5. Chen J.-M., Chen M.-C., Sun Y.S. A tag based learning approach to knowledge acquisition for constructing prior knowledge and enhancing student reading comprehension. Comput. Educ. 2014, 70:256-268.
6. Corno L. On teaching adaptively. Educ. Psychol. 2008, 43(3):161-173.
7. Corno L., Snow R.E. Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. Handbook of Research on Teaching 1986, 605-629.
8. Danchak M.M., Huguet M.P. Designing for the changing role of the instructor in blended learning. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 2004, 47(3):200-210.
9. Davies R.S., Dean D.L., Ball N. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2013, 61(4):563-580.
10. Day J.A., Foley J.D. Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human-computer interaction course. IEEE Trans. Educ. 2006, 49(4):420-431.
11. Felder R.M. How about a quick one?. Chem. Eng. Educ. 1992, 26(1).
12. Felder R.M. Random thoughts . . . Hang in there! Dealing with student resistance to learner-centered teaching. Chem. Eng. Educ. 2011, 45(2):131-132.
13. Fraij F. The impact of feedback in computer-aided instruction. Int. J. Soft Comput. 2010, 5(2):67-71.
14. Fraij F., Al-Dmour A., Al-Hashemi R., Musa A. An evolving recommender-based framework for virtual learning communities. Int. J. Web Based Communities 2012, 8(3):322-332.
15. Fulton K. Upside down and inside out: flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learn. Lead. Technol. 2012, 39(8):12-17.
16. Hannafin M.J., Hill J.R., Land S.M. Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: status, issues, and implications. Contemp. Educ. 1997, 68(2):94-99.
17. Hughes G. Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teach. High. Educ. 2007, 12(3):349-363.
18. Kakosimos K.E., Mihailidi E. European workshop on teaching safety in chemical engineering. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2010, 88:iii-v.
19. Kalinic Z., Arsovski S., Stefanovic M., Arsovski Z., Rankovic V. The development of a mobile learning application as support for a blended eLearning environment. Tech. Technol. Educ. Manag. 2011, 6(4):1345-1355.
20. Kellogg S. Developing online materials to facilitate an inverted classroom approach. 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009 (FIE'09) 2009.
21. Kim M.K., Kim S.M., Khera O., Getman J. The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. Internet High. Educ. 2014, 22:37-50.
22. Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development 1984.
23. Lage M.J., Platt G.J., Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J. Econ. Educ. 2000, 31(1):30-43.
24. Lam J., Lau N., Shim C., Cheung S.K.S. Design and development process for blended learning courses. Int. J. Innov. Learn. 2013, 13(3):322-338.
25. Lian Y. Adaptive teaching for large classes. International Conference on Engineering Education 2003.
26. Marepalli P., Magana A., Taleyarkhan M.R., Sambamurthy N., Clark J.V. SugarAid 0.2: An Online Learning Tool for STEM 2010.
27. Mason G.S., Shuman T.R., Cook K.E. Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Trans. Educ. 2013, 56(4):430-435.
28. Mezeske B.A., Mezeske R.J. Beyond Tests and Quizzes: Creative Assessments in the College Classroom 2007, Jossey-Bass/John Wiley [distributor], Chichester/San Francisco, CA.
29. O'Donoghue T.A., Punch K. Qualitative Educational Research in Action: Doing and Reflecting 2003, Routledge/Falmer, New York/London.
30. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods 2002, SAGE, London. 3rd ed.
31. Pohl M., Rester M., Stöckelmayr K., Jerlich J., Judmaier P., Reichl F., et al. Computer supported collaborative learning and vocational training: adapting the technology to the learners' needs. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2008, 7(4):259-272.
32. Ronchetti M. Using video lectures to make teaching more interactive. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2010, 5(2):45-48.
33. So H.J., Brush T.A. Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Comput. Educ. 2008, 51(1):318-336.
34. Stuart A. A blended learning approach to safety training: student experiences of safe work practices and safety culture. Saf. Sci. 2014, 62:409-417.
35. Sullivan G.M., Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the p value is not enough. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 2012, 4(3):279-282.
36. Swartz B., Velegol S.B., Laman J.A. Three approaches to flipping CE courses: faculty perspectives and suggestions. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2013.
37. TAMUQ-CHEN ABET Student Outcomes for Chemical Engineering Program 2014, Texas A&M University at Qatar, http://chen.qatar.tamu.edu/About/Pages/StudentOutcomes.aspx (accessed 2014).
38. Violante M.G., Vezzetti E. Virtual interactive e-learning application: an evaluation of the student satisfaction. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2013.
39. Watson J., Strayer D. Supertaskers: profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2010, 17(4):479-485.
40. Wu J.-H., Tennyson R.D., Hsia T.-L. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Comput. Educ. 2010, 55(1):155-164.