The impact of feedback in computer-aided instruction

International Journal of Soft Computing

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 67-71

  Fraij, F ^a  

^a AL HUSSEIN BIN TALAL UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Adaptive learning environment; Blended learning; Feed back; Instruction; Instructional computing; Mathematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955235935     PISSN: 18169503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ijscomp.2010.67.71     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brown, S. and A. Glasner, 1999. Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and using Diverse Approaches. Open University Press, Buckingham.
2. Brusilovsky, P. and R. Rizzo, 2002. Map-based horizontal navigation in educational hypertext. Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, June 11-15, ACM, New York, USA., pp: 1-10.
3. Clark, K. and F.M. Dwyer, 1998. Effects of different types of computer-assisted feedback strategies on achievement and response confidence. Int. J. Instructional Media, 25: 55-63.
4. De Bra, P. and L. Calvi, 1998. AHA! An open adaptive hypermedia architecture. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia, 4: 115-139.
5. Dempsey, J.V., M.P. Driscoll and L.K. Swindell, 1993. Text-Based Feedback. In: Interactive Instruction and Feedback, Dempsey, J.V. and G.C. Sales (Eds.). Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp: 21-54.
6. Foote, C, 1999. Attribution feedback in the elementary classroom. J. Res. Childhood Educ., 13: 155-166.
7. Fraij, F., 2008. Visual and interactive computer-based software for teaching a mathematics course: An approach. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on AI Tools in Engineering, Pune, India.
8. Fraij, F., M. Al-Quraan, A. Dababseh and S. Al-Obedi, 2010. The impact of employing technology in teaching a mathematics course. Int. J. Innovation Learning (IJIL), Vol. 8, No. 2.
9. Frith, V., J. Jaftha and R. Prince, 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive computer tutorials for an undergraduate mathematical literacy course. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 35: 159-171.
10. Gibbs, G. and C. Simpson, 2004. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning Teaching Higher Educ., 1: 3-29.
11. Gill, M. and M. Greenhow, 2008. How effective is feedback in computer-aided assessments?. Learning Media Technol., 33: 207-220.
12. Mavrikis, M. and A. Maciocia, 2003. WALLIS: A web-based ILE for science and engineering students studying mathematics. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, (AIE'03), Sydney, Australia, pp: 505-512.
13. Melis, E., E. Andres, J. Budenbender, A. Frishauf and G. Goguadse et al., 2001. ActiveMath: A web-based learning environment. Int. J. Artificial Intel. Educ., 12: 385-407.
14. Mory, E.H., 2004. Feedback Research Revisited. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Chapter 29, Jonassen, D.H. (Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp: 745-783.
15. Murray, T., 2003. MetaLinks: Authoring and affordances for conceptual and narrative flow in adaptive hyperbooks. Int. J. Artificial Intel. Educ., 13: 199-233.
16. Ramsden, P., 2005. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd Edn., Routledge, London.
17. Warden, C.A., 2000. EFL business writing behaviors in different feedback environments. Language Learning, 50: 573-616.
18. Weber, G. and P. Brusilovsky, 2001. ELM-ART: an adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction. Int. J. Artificial Intel. Educ., 12: 1-35.