Evaluating the performance of anchored hybrid enrichment at the tips of the tree of life: A phylogenetic analysis of Australian Eugongylus group scincid lizards

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Brandley, Matthew C ^a,b   Bragg, Jason G ^c   Singhal, Sonal ^d   Chapple, David G ^e   Jennings, Charlotte K ^d   Lemmon, Alan R ^f   Lemmon, Emily Moriarty ^f   Thompson, Michael B ^a   Moritz, Craig ^c,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anchored phylogenomics; Coalescence; Phylogeography; Skink; Transcriptome; Ultraconserved elements

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; LIZARD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY;

AUSTRALIA; TASMANIA;

CRYPTOBLEPHARUS; EUGONGYLUS; LAMPROPHOLIS; NIVEOSCINCUS; PSEUDEMOIA; SAPROSCINCUS; SCINCIDAE; SQUAMATA;

ANIMAL; AUSTRALIA; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; LIZARD; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIZARDS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84938985774     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0318-0     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR. High-throughput genomic data in systematics and phylogenetics. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2013;44:99-121.
2. Faircloth BC, Sorenson L, Santini F, Alfaro ME. A phylogenomic perspective on the radiation of ray-finned fishes based upon targeted sequencing of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65923.
3. Johnson BR, Borowiec ML, Chiu JC, Lee EK, Atallah J, Ward PS. Phylogenomics resolves evolutionary relationships among ants, bees, and wasps. Curr Biol. 2013;23:2565.
4. Simon S, Narechania A, DeSalle R, Hadrys H. Insect phylogenomics: exploring the source of incongruence using new transcriptomic data. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4:1295-309.
5. Wen J, Xiong Z, Nie Z-L, Mao L, Zhu Y, Kan X-Z et al. Transcriptome sequences resolve deep relationships of the grass family. PLoS ONE 2013, e74394.
6. Peters RS, Meusemann K, Petersen M, Mayer C, Wilbrandt J, Ziesmann T, et al. The evolutionary history of holometabolous insects inferred from transcriptome-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;14:52.
7. Faircloth BC, McCormack JE, Crawford NG, Harvey MG, Brumfield RT, Glenn TC. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst Biol. 2012;61:717-26.
8. Bi K, Vanderpool D, Singhal S, Linderoth T, Moritz C, Good JM. Transcriptome-based exon capture enables highly cost-effective comparative genomic data collection at moderate evolutionary scales. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:403.
9. Lemmon AR, Emme SA, Lemmon EM. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst Biol. 2012;61:727-44.
10. Bybee SM, Bracken-Grissom HD, Hermansen RA, Clement MJ, Crandall KA, Felderc DL. Directed next generation sequencing for phylogenetics: an example using Decapoda (Crustacea). Zool Anz. 2011;250:497-506.
11. O'Neill EM, Schwartz R, Bullock CT, Williams JS, Shaffer HB, Aguilar-Miguel X, et al. Parallel tagged amplicon sequencing reveals major lineages and phylogenetic structure in the North American tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) species complex. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:111-29.
12. Barrow LN, Ralicki HF, Emme SA, Moriarty Lemmon E. Species tree estimation of North American chorus frogs (Hylidae: Pseudacris) with parallel tagged amplicon sequencing. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;75:78-90.
13. Miller MR, Atwood TS, Eames BF, Eberhart JK, Yan Y-L, Postlethwait JH, et al. RAD marker microarrays enable rapid mapping of zebrafish mutations. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R105.
14. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, et al. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3376.
15. Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37135.
16. Peñalba JV, Smith LL, Tonione MA, Sass C, Hykin SM, Skipwith PL, et al. Sequence capture using PCR-generated probes: a cost-effective method of targeted high-throughput sequencing for nonmodel organisms. Mol Ecol. 2014;14:1000-10.
17. Smith BT, Harvey MG, Faircloth BC, Glenn TC, Brumfield RT. Target capture and massively parallel sequencing of ultraconserved elements for comparative studies at shallow evolutionary time scales. Syst Biol. 2014;63:83-95.
18. Bejerano G, Pheasant M, Makunin I, Stephen S, Kent WJ, Mattick JS, et al. Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science. 2004;304:1321-5.
19. Katzman S, Kern AD, Bejerano G, Fewell G, Fulton L, Wilson RK, et al. Human genome ultraconserved elements are ultraselected. Science. 2007;317:915-5.
20. Smith SA, Sadlier RA, Bauer AM, Austin CC, Jackman T. Molecular phylogeny of the scincid lizards of New Caledonia and adjacent areas: evidence for a single origin of the endemic skinks of Tasmantis. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;43:1151-66.
21. Chapple DG, Ritchie PA, Daugherty CH. Origin, diversification, and systematics of the New Zealand skink fauna (Reptilia: Scincidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;52:470-87.
22. Skinner A, Hugall AF, Hutchinson MN. Lygosomine phylogeny and the origins of Australian scincid lizards. J Biogeogr. 2011;38:1044-58.
23. Moussalli A, Moritz C, Williams SE, Carnaval AC. Variable responses of skinks to a common history of rainforest fluctuation: concordance between phylogeography and palaeo-distribution models. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:483-99.
24. Bell RC, Parra JL, Tonione M, Hoskin CJ, Mackenzie JB, Williams SE, et al. Patterns of persistence and isolation indicate resilience to climate change in montane rainforest lizards. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:2531-44.
25. Dolman G, Moritz C. A multilocus perspective on refugial isolation and divergence in rainforest skinks (Carlia). Evolution. 2006;60:573-82.
26. Chapple DG, Hoskin CJ, Chapple SNJ, Thompson MB. Phylogeographic divergence in the widespread delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata) corresponds to dry habitat barriers in eastern Australia. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:191.
27. Chapple DG, Chapple SNJ, Thompson MB. Biogeographic barriers in south-eastern Australia drive phylogeographic divergence in the garden skink, Lampropholis guichenoti. J Biogeogr. 2011;38:1761-75.
28. Singhal S, Moritz C. Testing hypotheses for genealogical discordance in a rainforest lizard. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:5059-72.
29. Singhal S, Moritz C. Reproductive isolation between phylogeographic lineages scales with divergence. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280:20132246.
30. Dolman G, Hugall AF. Combined mitochondrial and nuclear data enhance resolution of a rapid radiation of Australian rainbow skinks (Scincidae: Carlia). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008;49:782-94.
31. Adams SM, Biazik JM, Thompson MB, Murphy CR. Cyto-epitheliochorial placenta of the viviparous lizard Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii: a new placental morphotype. J Morph. 2005;264:264-76.
32. Thompson MB, Speake BK. A review of the evolution of viviparity in lizards: structure, function and physiology of the placenta. J Comp Physiol B Biochem Syst Environ Physiol. 2006;176:179-89.
33. Stewart JR, Thompson MB. Parallel evolution of placentation in Australian scincid lizards. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2009;312:590-602.
34. Stewart JR, Thompson MB. Placental ontogeny in Tasmanian snow skinks (Genus Niveoscincus) (Lacertilia: Scincidae). J Morph. 2009;270:485-516.
35. Meyer M, Kircher M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2011;6:pdb prot5448.
36. Rokyta DR, Lemmon AR, Margres MJ, Arnow K. The venom-gland transcriptome of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus). BMC Genomics. 2012;13:312.
37. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792-7.
38. Brandley MC, Young RL, Warren DL, Thompson MB, Wagner GP. Uterine gene expression in the live-bearing lizard, Chalcides ocellatus, reveals convergence of squamate reptile and mammalian pregnancy mechanisms. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4:394-411.
39. Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJM, Birol I. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 2009;19:1117-23.
40. Singhal S. De novo transcriptomic analyses for non-model organisms: an evaluation of methods across a multi-species data set. Mol Ecol Resources. 2013;13:403-16.
41. Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957-63.
42. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114-20.
43. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotech. 2011;29:644-52.
44. Kent WJ. BLAT - The BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 2002;12:656-64.
45. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1658-9.
46. Huang X, Madan A. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. I. 1999;9:868-77.
47. Nylander JAA. MrAIC.pl, program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre. Uppsala University.
48. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307-21.
49. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2688-90.
50. Kubatko LS, Degnan JH. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst Biol. 2007;56:17-24.
51. Belfiore NM, Liu L, Moritz C. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst Biol. 2008;57:294-310.
52. Weisrock DW, Smith SD, Chan LM, Biebouw K, Kappeler PM, Yoder AD. Mouse lemur phylogeny: an empirical demonstration of the effect of allele sampling in phylogenetics. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1615-2630.
53. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst Biol. 2009;58:468-77.
54. Liu L, Yu L. Phybase: an R package for species tree analysis. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:962-3.
55. Larget BR, Kotha SK, Dewey CN, Ané C. BUCKy: Gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2910-1.
56. Zhu T, Yang Z. Maximum likelihood implementation of an isolation-with-migration model with three species for testing speciation with gene flow. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(10):3131-42.
57. Yang Z. A likelihood ratio test of speciation with gene flow using genomic sequence data. Gen Biol Evol. 2010;2:200-11.
58. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357-9.
59. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078-9.
60. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297-303.
61. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G∈+∈C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol. 1992;9:678-87.
62. Gutenkunst RN, Hernandez RD, Williamson SH, Bustamante CD. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000695.
63. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e68.
64. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:332-40.
65. Brito PH, Edwards SV. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica. 2009;135:439-55.
66. Zwickl DJ, Stein JC, Wing RA, Ware D, Sanderson MJ. Disentangling Methodological and Biological Sources of Gene Tree Discordance on Oryza (Poaceae) Chromosome 3. Syst Biol. 2014;63:645-59.
67. Melville J, Swain R. Mitochondrial DNA-sequence based phylogeny and biogeography of the snow skinks (Squamata: Scincidae: Niveoscincus) of Tasmania. Herpetol. 2000;56:196-208.
68. Bryant D, Bouckaert R, Felsenstein J, Rosenberg NA, RoyChoudhury A. Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1917-32.
69. Mirarab S, Bayzid MS, Boussau B, Warnow T. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree. Science. 2014;29:1250463.
70. Cutter AD. Integrating phylogenetics, phylogeography and population genetics through genomes and evolutionary theory. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69:1172-85.
71. Moussalli A, Hugall AF, Moritz C. A mitochondrial phylogeny of the rainforest skink genus Saproscincus, Wells and Wellington (1984). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005;34:190-202.
72. Van Dyke JU, Brandley MC, Thompson MB. The evolution of viviparity: molecular and genomic data from squamate reptiles advance understanding of live birth in amniotes. Reproduction. 2014;147:R15-26.
73. Bi K, Linderoth T, Vanderpool D, Good JM, Nielsen R, Moritz C. Unlocking the vault: next-generation museum population genomics. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:6018-32.