The evolutionary history of holometabolous insects inferred from transcriptome-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Peters, Ralph S ^a   Meusemann, Karen ^a,b   Petersen, Malte ^a   Mayer, Christoph ^a   Wilbrandt, Jeanne ^a   Ziesmann, Tanja ^a   Donath, Alexander ^a   Kjer, Karl M ^c   Aspöck, Ulrike ^d,e   Aspöck, Horst ^f   Aberer, Andre ^g   Stamatakis, Alexandros ^g,h   Friedrich, Frank ⁱ   Hünefeld, Frank ^j   Niehuis, Oliver ^a   Beutel, Rolf G ^j   Misof, Bernhard ^a  

^a ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG   (Germany)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATURHISTORISCHES MUSEUM WIEN   (Austria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^g HEIDELBERG INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL STUDIES   (Germany)

^h KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^j FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; ANCESTRY; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INSECT; METAMORPHOSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; RELATEDNESS; TAXONOMY;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CLASSIFICATION; EGG LAYING; EVOLUTION; GENE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HYMENOPTERA; INSECT; LARVA; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENES, INSECT; HYMENOPTERA; INSECTS; LARVA; OVIPOSITION; PHYLOGENY; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84899049765     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-52     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Phylogeny of endopterygote insects, the most successful lineage of living organisms. Kristensen NP, Eur J Entomol 1999 96 237 254
2. Grimaldi D, Engel MS, Evolution of the Insects Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005
3. Endopterygote systematics-where do we stand and what is the goal (Hexapoda, Arthropoda)? Beutel RG, Pohl H, Syst Entomol 2006 31 202 219 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00341.x
4. Hennig W, Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten Frankfurt a. M: Waldemar Kramer 1969
5. The phylogeny of the panorpoid orders. Hinton HE, Ann Rev Entomol 1958 3 181 206 10.1146/annurev.en.03.010158.001145
6. Rasnitsyn AP, Quicke DLJ, The history of insects Dordrecht: Kluwer Publications 2002
7. Relationships among coleopteran suborders and major endoneopteran lineages: evidence from hind wing characters. Kukalová-Peck J, Lawrence JF, Eur J Entomol 2004 101 95 144 10.14411/eje.2004.018
8. Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny. Beutel RG, Gorb S, J Zool Syst Evol Res 2001 39 77 207 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2001.00158.x
9. A revised interpretation of the evolution of attachment structures in Hexapoda (Arthropoda), with special emphasis on Mantophasmatodea. Beutel RG, Gorb S, Arthropod Syst Phyl 2006 64 3 25
10. The phylogeny of extant hexapod orders. Wheeler WC, Whiting M, Wheeler QD, Carpenter JM, Cladistics 2001 17 113 169 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00115.x
11. The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Whiting MF, Carpenter JC, Wheeler QD, Wheeler WC, Syst Biol 1997 46 1 68 11975347
12. Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera. Whiting MF, Zool Scripta 2002 31 93 104 10.1046/j.0300-3256.2001. 00095.x
13. Single-copy nuclear genes resolve the phylogeny of the holometabolous insects. Wiegmann BM, Trautwein MD, Kim JW, Cassel BK, Bertone MA, Winterton SL, Yeates DK, BMC Biol 2009 7 34 10.1186/1741-7007-7-34 19552814
14. 9-genes reinforce the phylogeny of Holometabola and yield alternate views on the phylogenetic placement of Strepsiptera. McKenna DD, Farrell BD, PLoS ONE 2010 5 11887 10.1371/journal.pone.0011887 20686704
15. Morphological and molecular evidence converging upon a robust phylogeny of the megadiverse Holometabola. Beutel RG, Friedrich F, Hörnschemeyer T, Pohl H, Hünefeld F, Beckmann F, Meier R, Misof B, Whiting MF, Vilhemsen L, Cladistics 2011 26 1 15
16. Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein-coding gene sequences. Ishiwata K, Sasaki G, Ogawa J, Miyata T, Su ZH, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2011 58 169 180 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.001 21075208
17. Genomic and morphological evidence converge to resolve the enigma of Strepsiptera. Niehuis O, Hartig G, Grath S, Pohl H, Lehmann J, Tafer H, Donath A, Krauss V, Eisenhardt C, Hertel J, Petersen M, Mayer C, Meusemann K, Peters RS, Stadler PF, Beutel RG, Bornberg-Bauer E, McKenna DD, Misof B, Curr Biol 2012 22 1309 1313 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.018 22704986
18. Phylogeny of the Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola). Aspöck U, Zool Scripta 2002 31 51 55 10.1046/j.0300-3256.2001.00087.x
19. The phylogeny of the Neuropterida: long lasting and current controversies and challenges (Insecta: Endopterygota). Aspöck U, Haring E, Aspöck H, Arthropod Syst Phyl 2012 70 119 129
20. Head morphology of Osmylus fulvicephalus (Osmylidae, Neuroptera) and its phylogenetic implications. Beutel RG, Zimmermann D, Krauß M, Randolf S, Wipfler B, Org Divers Evol 2012 10 311 329
21. Advances in insect phylogeny at the dawn of the postgenomic era. Trautwein MD, Wiegmann BM, Beutel R, Kjer K, Yeates DK, Ann Rev Entomol 2012 57 449 468 10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100538
22. Decisive data sets in phylogenomics: Lessons from studies on the phylogenetic relationships of primarily wingless insects. Dell'Ampio E, Meusemann K, Szucsich NU, Peters RS, Meyer B, Borner J, Petersen M, Aberer AJ, Stamatakis A, Walzl MG, Minh BQ, von Haeseler A, Ebersberger I, Pass G, Misof B, Mol Biol Evol 2014 31 239 249 10.1093/molbev/mst196 24140757
23. Likelihood-mapping: A simple method to visualize phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997 94 6815 6819 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6815 9192648
24. Good bye Halteria? The thoracic morphology of Endopterygota (Insecta) and its phylogenetic implications. Friedrich F, Beutel RG, Cladistics 2010 26 579 612 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00305.x
25. A molecular phylogeny of Hexapoda. Kjer KM, Carle FL, Litman J, Ware J, Arthropod Syst Phyl 2006 64 35 44
26. On wings of lace: phylogeny and Bayesian divergence time estimates of Neuropterida (Insecta) based on morphological and molecular data. Winterton SL, Hardy NB, Wiegmann BM, Syst Entomol 2010 35 349 378 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010. 00521.x
27. Neuropteroidea. Revisionary notes. Achtelig M, Insect Phylogeny Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Hennig W, 1981 286 300
28. Cladistic analysis of Neuroptera and their systematic position within Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola: Neuropterida: Neuroptera). Aspöck U, Plant JD, Nemeschkal HL, Syst Entomol 2001 26 73 86 10.1046/j.1365-3113.2001. 00136.x
29. Phylogenetic relevance of the genital sclerites of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola). Aspöck U, Aspöck H, Syst Entomol 2008 33 97 127 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2007.00396.x
30. The phylogeny of Strepsiptera (Hexapoda). Pohl H, Beutel RG, Cladistics 2005 21 328 374 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00074.x
31. Tiny genomes and endoreduplication in Strepsiptera. Johnston JS, Ross LD, Beani L, Hughes DP, Kathirithamby J, Insect Mol Biol 2004 13 581 585 10.1111/j.0962-1075.2004.00514.x 15606806
32. Twisted parasites from "outer space" perplex biologists. Proffitt F, Science 2005 307 343 10.1126/science.307.5708.343 15661988
33. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Maddison WP, Maddison DR, 2007 [ http://mesquiteproject.org
34. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Salichos L, Rokas A, Nature 2013 497 327 331 10.1038/nature12130 23657258
35. Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. Kjer KM, Syst Biol 2004 53 506 514 10.1080/10635150490445922 15503677
36. A simple and accurate method for rogue taxon identification. Aberer AJ, Stamatakis A, Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) Atlanta: IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine 2011 118 122
37. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the basal pterygote divergence. Simon S, Strauss S, von Haeseler A, Hadrys H, Mol Biol Evol 2009 26 2719 2730 10.1093/molbev/msp191 19713325
38. Insect phylogenomics: exploring the source of incongruence using new transcriptomic data. Simon S, Narechania A, DeSalle R, Hadrys H, Genome Biol Evol 2012 4 1295 1309 10.1093/gbe/evs104 23175716
39. Resolving insect phylogeny: the significance of cephalic structures of the Nannomecoptera in understanding endopterygote relationships. Beutel RG, Kristensen N-P, Pohl H, Arthropod Struct Dev 2009 38 427 460 10.1016/j.asd.2009.05.002 19500687
40. Head anatomy of Xyelidae (Hexapoda: Hymenoptera) and phylogenetic implications. Beutel RG, Vilhelmsen LB, Org Div Evol 2007 7 207 230 10.1016/j.ode.2006.06.003
41. The morphology and evolution of the female postabdomen of Holometabola (Insecta). Hünefeld F, Mißbach C, Beutel RG, Arthropod Struct Dev 2012 41 361 371 10.1016/j.asd.2012.05.002 22583791
42. Phylogenetic relationships of the suborders of Coleoptera (Insecta). Beutel RG, Haas F, Cladistics 2000 16 103 141 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00350.x
43. HaMStR: profile hidden Markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. Ebersberger I, Strauss S, von Haeseler A, BMC Evol Biol 2009 9 157 10.1186/1471-2148-9-157 19586527
44. Improved accuracy of multiple ncRNA alignment by incorporating structural information into a MAFFT-based framework. Katoh K, Toh H, BMC Bioinforma 2008 9 212 10.1186/1471-2105-9-212
45. A Monte Carlo approach successfully identifies randomness in multiple sequence alignments: a more objective means of data exclusion. Misof B, Misof K, Syst Biol 2009 58 21 34 10.1093/sysbio/syp006 20525566
46. Parametric and non-parametric masking of randomness in sequence alignments can be improved and leads to better resolved trees. Kück P, Meusemann K, Dambach J, Thormann B, von Reumont B, Wägele JW, Misof B, Front Zool 2010 7 10 10.1186/1742-9994-7-10 20356385
47. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the arthropod tree of life. Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, Roeding F, Strauss S, Kück P, Ebersberger I, Walzl M, Pass G, Breuers S, Achter V, von Haeseler A, Burmester T, Hadrys H, Wägele JW, Misof B, Mol Biol Evol 2010 27 2451 2464 10.1093/molbev/msq130 20534705
48. Kück P, ALICUT: a Perlscript which cuts ALISCORE identified RSS Bonn, Germany: Department of Bioinformatics, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK) 20 2009 [ http://www.museumkoenig.de/web/ZFMK-Mitarbeiter/ KckPatrick/Software/AliCUT/Download/index.de.html
49. Meyer B, Misof B, MARE: Matrix Reduction-A tool to select optimized data subsets from supermatrices for phylogenetic inference Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany: Zentrum für molekulare Biodiversitätsforschung (zmb) am ZFMK 2010 [ http://mare.zfmk.de
50. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Phillips MJ, Penny D, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2003 28 171 185 10.1016/S1055- 7903(03)00057-5 12878457
51. RAxML-Light: a tool for computing TeraByte Phylogenies. Stamatakis A, Aberer AJ, Goll C, Smith SA, Berger SA, Izquierdo-Carrasco F, Bioinformatics 2012 28 2064 2066 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts309 22628519
52. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Yang Z, Trends Ecol Evol 1996 11 367 372 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10041-0 21237881
53. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Stamatakis A, Bioinformatics 2006 22 2688 2690 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 16928733
54. Hybrid MPI/Pthreads Parallelization of the RAxML Phylogenetics Code. Pfeiffer W, Stamatakis A, IPDPS Workshops, IEEE Atlanta 2010 1 8
55. Large-scale maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analysis on the IBM BlueGene/L. Ott M, Zola J, Stamatakis A, Aluru S, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing Reno 2007 4 11
56. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Le SQ, Gascuel O, Mol Biol Evol 2008 25 1307 1320 10.1093/molbev/msn067 18367465
57. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds OR, Moret BM, Stamatakis A, J Comput Biol 2010 17 337 354 10.1089/cmb.2009.0179 20377449
58. Pruning rogue taxa improves phylogenetic accuracy: an efficient algorithm and webservice. Aberer AJA, Krompass D, Stamatakis A, Syst Biol 2012 62 162 166 22962004
59. TreeGraph 2: Combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. Stöver BC, Müller KF, BMC Bioinforma 2010 11 7 10.1186/1471-2105-11-7