Species tree estimation of North American chorus frogs (Hylidae: Pseudacris) with parallel tagged amplicon sequencing

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 78-90

  Barrow, Lisa N ^a   Ralicki, Hannah F ^a   Emme, Sandra A ^a   Lemmon, Emily Moriarty ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anonymous nuclear locus; High throughput sequencing; Phylogenetics; Pseudacris; Reduced representation library; Targeted amplicon sequencing

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ANONYMOUS NUCLEAR LOCUS; ANURA; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; PSEUDACRIS; REDUCED REPRESENTATION LIBRARY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TARGETED AMPLICON SEQUENCING;

ANONYMOUS NUCLEAR LOCUS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; PHYLOGENETICS; PSEUDACRIS; REDUCED REPRESENTATION LIBRARY; TARGETED AMPLICON SEQUENCING;

ANIMALS; ANURA; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84895968659     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Albert T.J., Molla M.N., Muzny D.M., Nazareth L., Wheeler D., Song X., Richmond T.A., Middle C.M., Rodesch M.J., Packard C.J., Weinstock G.M., Gibbs R.A. Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization. Nat. Methods 2007, 4:903-905.
2. Ané C., Larget B., Baum D.A., Smith S.D., Rokas A. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:412-426.
3. Avise J.C., Arnold J., Ball R.M., Bermingham E., Lamb T., Neigel J.E., Reeb C.A., Saunders N.C. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987, 18:489-522.
4. Belfiore N.M., Liu L., Moritz C. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:294-310.
5. Brito P.H., Edwards S.V. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica 2009, 135:439-455.
6. Bybee S.M., Bracken-Grissom H., Haynes B.D., Hermansen R.A., Byers R.L., Clement M.J., Udall J.A., Wilcox E.R., Crandall K.A. Targeted amplicon sequencing (TAS): a scalable next-gen approach to multilocus, multitaxa phylogenetics. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3:1312-1323.
7. Bybee S.M., Bracken-Grissom H.D., Hermansen R.A., Clement M.J., Crandall K.A., Felder D.L. Directed next generation sequencing for phylogenetics: an example using Decapoda (Crustacea). Zool. Anz. 2011, 250:497-506.
8. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17:540-552.
9. Chung Y., Ané C. Comparing two Bayesian methods for gene tree/species tree reconstructions: simulations with incomplete lineage sorting and horizontal gene transfer. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60:261-275.
10. Davey J.W., Hohenlohe P.A., Etter P.D., Boone J.Q., Catchen J.M., Blaxter M.L. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:499-510.
11. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e68.
12. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
13. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:1792-1797.
14. Edwards S.V. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?. Evolution 2009, 63:1-19.
15. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:5936-5941.
16. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Harvey M.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:717-726.
17. Fouquette M.J. Speciation in chorus frogs I. Reproductive character displacement in the Pseudacris nigrita complex. Syst. Zool. 1975, 24:16-22.
18. Gartside D.F. Analysis of a hybrid zone between chorus frogs of the Pseudacris nigrita complex in the southern United States. Copeia 1980, 1:56-66.
19. Gnirke A., Melnikov A., Maguire J., Rogov P., LeProust E.M., Brockman W., Fennell T., Giannoukos G., Fisher S., Russ C., Gabriel S., Jaffe D.B., Lander E.S., Nusbaum C. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:182-189.
20. Gouy M., Guindon S., Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:221-224.
21. Griffin P.C., Robin C., Hoffmann A.A. A next-generation sequencing method for overcoming the multiple gene copy problem in polyploidy phylogenetics, applied to Poa grasses. BMC Biol. 2011, 9:19.
22. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:570-580.
23. Hillis D.M., Huelsenbeck J.P. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Hered. 1992, 83:189-195.
24. IUCN, 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. (downloaded 13.02.13). http://www.iucnredlist.org.
25. Jeffroy O., Brinkmann H., Delsuc F., Philippe H. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence?. Trends Genet. 2006, 22:225-231.
26. Knowles L.L. Statistical phylogeography. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:593-612.
27. Kubatko L.S. Identifying hybridization events in the presence of coalescence via model selection. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:478-488.
28. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:17-24.
29. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:971-973.
30. Larget B.R., Kotha S.K., Dewey C.N., Ané C. BUCKy: gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2910-2911.
31. Leaché A.D., Rannala B. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60:126-137.
32. Lee J.Y., Joseph L., Edwards S.V. A species tree for the Australo-Papuan fairy-wrens and allies (Aves: Maluridae). Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:253-271.
33. Lemmon E.M. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 2009, 63:1155-1170.
34. Lemmon E.M., Lemmon A.R. Reinforcement in chorus frogs: lifetime fitness estimates including intrinsic natural selection and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 2010, 64:1748-1761.
35. Lemmon A.R., Lemmon E.M. High-throughput identification of informative nuclear loci for shallow-scale phylogenetics and phylogeography. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:745-761.
36. Lemmon E.M., Lemmon A.R. High-throughput genomic data in systematics and phylogenetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013, 44:99-121.
37. Lemmon E.M., Lemmon A.R., Collins J.T., Lee-Yaw J.A., Cannatella D.C. Phylogeny-based delimitation of species boundaries and contact zones in the trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44:1068-1082.
38. Lemmon E.M., Lemmon A.R., Cannatella D.C. Geological and climatic forces driving speciation in the continentally distributed trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Evolution 2007, 61:2086-2103.
39. Lemmon A.R., Emme S.A., Lemmon E.M. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:727-744.
40. Liu L., Pearl D.K. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:504-514.
41. Liu L., Yu L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:468-477.
42. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
43. Mamanova L., Coffey A.J., Scott C.E., Kozarewa I., Turner E.H., Kumar A., Howard E., Shendure J., Turner D.J. Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:111-118.
44. McCormack J.E., Hird S.M., Zellmer A.J., Carstens B.C., Brumfield R.T. Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66:526-538.
45. McCormack J.E., Harvey M.G., Faircloth B.C., Crawford N.G., Glenn T.C., Brumfield R.T. A phylogeny of birds based on over 1,500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e54848.
46. Meyer M., Kircher M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010, 2010. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448.
47. Moriarty E.C., Cannatella D.C. Phylogenetic relationships of the North American chorus frogs (Pseudacris: Hylidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 30:409-420.
48. Neill W.T. The status of Baird's chorus-frog. Copeia 1949, 3:227-228.
49. Nylander J.A.A. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author 2004, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
50. O'Neill E.M., Schwartz R., Bullock C.T., Williams J.S., Shaffer H.B., Aguilar-Miguel X., Parra-Olea G., Weisrock D.W. Parallel tagged amplicon sequencing reveals major lineages and phylogenetic structure in the North American tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) species complex. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:111-129.
51. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1988, 5:568-583.
52. Philippe H., Delsuc F., Brinkmann H., Lartillot N. Phylogenomics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36:541-562.
53. Platz J.E. Speciation within the chorus frog Pseudacris triseriata: morphometric and mating call analyses of the boreal and Western subspecies. Copeia 1989, 3:704-712.
54. Platz J.E., Forester D.C. Geographic variation in mating call among the four subspecies of the chorus frog: Pseudacris triseriata (Wied). Copeia 1988, 4:1062-1066.
55. Puritz J.B., Addison J.A., Toonen R.J. Next-generation phylogeography: a targeted approach for multilocus sequencing of non-model organisms. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e34241.
56. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2007. Tracer v1.4, http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
57. Recuero E., Martínez-Solano Í., Parra-Olea G., García-París M. Phylogeography of Pseudacris regilla (Anura: Hylidae) in western North America, with a proposal for a new taxonomic rearrangement. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 39:293-304.
58. Rodríguez-Ezpelata N., Brinkmann H., Roure B., Lartillot N., Lang B.F., Philippe H. Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:389-399.
59. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
60. Slowinski J.B., Page R.D.M. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data?. Syst. Biol. 1999, 48:814-825.
61. Smith P.W. An analysis of post-Wisconsin biogeography of the Prairie Peninsula region based on distributional phenomena among terrestrial vertebrate populations. Ecology 1957, 38:205-218.
62. Smith P.W., Smith D.M. The relationship of the chorus frogs, Pseudacris nigrita feriarum and Pseudacris n. triseriata. Am. Midl. Nat. 1952, 48:165-180.
63. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
64. *and Other Methods). Version 4 2003, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
65. Talavera G., Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:564-577.
66. Than C., Ruths D., Nakhleh L. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:322.
67. Toews D.P.L., Brelsford A. The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:3907-3930.
68. Townsend J.P. Phylogenetic informativeness. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:222-231.
69. Weisrock D.W., Smith S.D., Chan L.M., Biebouw K., Kappeler P.M., Yoder A.D. Concatenation and concordance in the reconstruction of mouse lemur phylogeny: an empirical demonstration of the effect of allele sampling in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1615-1630.
70. Wilson A.C., Cann R.L., Carr S.M., George M., Gyllensten U.B., Helm-Bychowski K.M., Higuchi R.G., Palumbi S.R., Prager E.M., Sage R.D., Stoneking M. Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 1985, 26:375-400.
71. Yu Y., Than C., Degnan J.H., Nakhleh L. Coalescent histories on phylogenetic networks and detection of hybridization despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60:138-149.