Divergence patterns of genic copy number variation in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) reveal three conserved genes with major population-specific expansions

Genome Research

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1114-1124

  Pezer, Željka ^a,b   Harr, Bettina ^a   Teschke, Meike ^a   Babiker, Hiba ^a   Tautz, Diethard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b RUDER BO KOVI INSTITUTE   (Croatia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOLLIDAY JUNCTION RECOGNITION PROTEIN; PROTEIN; SPINDLE PROTEIN SFI1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CWC22 PROTEIN, MOUSE; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HJURP PROTEIN, MOUSE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; SFI1 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE DELETION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOLLIDAY JUNCTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; OVERLAPPING GENE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN URINE LEVEL; PURIFYING SELECTION; RNA SPLICING; SEGMENTAL DUPLICATION; VOMERONASAL ORGAN; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; METABOLISM; POPULATION GENETICS; PROCEDURES;

MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME; GENOMICS; MICE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84938868246     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.187187.114     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abyzov A, Urban AE, Snyder M, Gerstein M. 2011. CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res 21: 974-984.
2. Alexandrov A, Colognori D, Shu M, Steitz JA. 2012. Human spliceosomal protein CWC22 plays a role in coupling splicing to exon junction complex deposition and nonsense-mediated decay. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 21313-21318.
3. Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. 2011. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat Rev Genet 12: 363-376.
4. Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt M-L, Maqbool K, Webster MT, Perloski M, Liberg O, Arnemo JM, Hedhammar A, Lindblad-Toh K. 2013. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495: 360-364.
5. Börsch-Haubold AG, Montero I, Konrad K, Haubold B. 2014. Genome-wide quantitative analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation in wild house mouse liver: environmental change causes epigenetic plasticity. PLoS One 9: e97568.
6. Bryk J, Tautz D. 2014. Copy number variants and selective sweeps in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). Front Genet 5: 153.
7. Chain FJJ, Feulner PGD, Panchal M, Eizaguirre C, Samonte IE, Kalbe M, Lenz TL, Stoll M, Bornberg-Bauer E, Milinski M, et al. 2014. Extensive copynumber variation of young genes across stickleback populations. PLoS Genet 10: e1004830.
8. Chamero P, Marton TF, Logan DW, Flanagan K, Cruz JR, Saghatelian A, Cravatt BF, Stowers L. 2007. Identification of protein pheromones that promote aggressive behavior. Nature 450: 899-902.
9. Chen WK, Swartz JD, Rush LJ, Alvarez CE. 2009. Mapping DNA structural variation in dogs. Genome Res 19: 500-509.
10. Chen C, Qiao R, Wei R, Guo Y, Ai H, Ma J, Ren J, Huang L. 2012. A comprehensive survey of copy number variation in 18 diverse pig populations and identification of candidate copy number variable genes associated with complex traits. BMC Genomics 13: 733.
11. Conrad DF, Andrews TD, Carter NP, Hurles ME, Pritchard JK. 2006. A highresolution survey of deletion polymorphism in the human genome. Nat Genet 38: 75-81.
12. Cooper GM, Nickerson DA, Eichler EE. 2007. Mutational and selective effects on copy-number variants in the human genome. Nat Genet 39: S22-S29.
13. Cucchi T, Vigne JD, Auffray JC. 2005. First occurrence of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz & Schwarz, 1943) in the Western Mediterranean: a zooarchaeological revision of subfossil occurrences. Biol J Linn Soc 84: 429-445.
14. Cutler G, Marshall LA, Chin N, Baribault H, Kassner PD. 2007. Significant gene content variation characterizes the genomes of inbred mouse strains. Genome Res 17: 1743-1754.
15. Didion JP, Morgan AP, Clayshulte AM, Mcmullan RC, Yadgary L, Petkov PM, Bell TA, Gatti DM, Crowley JJ, Hua K, et al. 2015. A multi-megabase copy number gain causes maternal transmission ratio distortion on mouse chromosome 2. PLoS Genet 11: e1004850.
16. Doan R, Cohen N, Harrington J, Veazey K, Juras R, Cothran G, McCue ME, Skow L, Dindot SV. 2012. Identification of copy number variants in horses. Genome Res 22: 899-907.
17. Duan J, Zhang JG, Deng HW, Wang YP. 2013. Comparative studies of copy number variation detection methods for next-generation sequencing technologies. PLoS One 8: e59128.
18. Eden E, Navon R, Steinfeld I, Lipson D, Yakhini Z. 2009. Gorilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 48.
19. Egan CM, Sridhar S, Wigler M, Hall IM. 2007. Recurrent DNA copy number variation in the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet 39: 1384-1389.
20. Eichler EE. 2001. Recent duplication, domain accretion and the dynamic mutation of the human genome. Trends Genet 17: 661-669.
21. Ewing AD, Ballinger TJ, Earl D; Broad Institute Genome Sequencing and Analysis Program and Platform, Harris CC, Ding L, Wilson RK, Haussler D. 2013. Retrotransposition of gene transcripts leads to structural variation in mammalian genomes. Genome Biol 14: R22.
22. Feuk L, Marshall CR, Wintle RF, Scherer SW. 2006. Structural variants: changing the landscape of chromosomes and design of disease studies. Hum Mol Genet 15: R57-R66.
23. Gazave E, Darre F, Morcillo-Suarez C, Petit-Marty N, Carreno A, Marigorta UM, Ryder OA, Blancher A, Rocchi M, Bosch E. 2011. Copy number variation analysis in the great apes reveals species-specific patterns of structural variation. Genome Res 21: 1626-1639.
24. Girirajan S, Campbell CD, Eichler EE. 2011. Human copy number variation and complex genetic disease. Annu Rev Genet 45: 203-226.
25. Gonzalez E, Kulkarni H, Bolivar H, Mangano A, Sanchez R, Catano G, Nibbs RJ, Freedman BI, Quinones MP, Bamshad MJ, et al. 2005. The influence of CCL3L1 gene-containing segmental duplications on HIV-1/AIDS susceptibility. Science 307: 1434-1440.
26. Graubert TA, Cahan P, Edwin D, Selzer RR, Richmond TA, Eis PS, Shannon WD, Li X, McLeod HL, Cheverud JM, et al. 2007. A high-resolution map of segmental DNA copy number variation in the mouse genome. PLoS Genet 3: e3.
27. Guénet JL, Bonhomme F. 2003. Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet 19: 24-31.
28. Guryev V, Saar K, Adamovic T, Verheul M, van Heesch SA, Cook S, Pravenec M, Aitman T, Jacob H, Shull JD, et al. 2008. Distribution and functional impact of DNA copy number variation in the rat. Nat Genet 40: 538-545.
29. Hardouin EA, Orth A, Teschke M, Darvish J, Tautz D, Bonhomme F. 2015. Eurasian house mouse (Mus musculus L.) differentiation at microsatellite loci identifies the Iranian plateau as a phylogeographic hotspot. BMC Evol Biol 15: 26.
30. Henrichsen CN, Chaignat E, Reymond A. 2009a. Copy number variants, diseases and gene expression. Hum Mol Genet 18: R1-R8.
31. Henrichsen CN, Vinckenbosch N, Zöllner S, Chaignat E, Pradervand S, Schütz F, Ruedi M, Kaessmann H, Reymond A. 2009b. Segmental copy number variation shapes tissue transcriptomes. Nat Genet 41: 424-429.
32. Heo JI, Cho JH, Kim JR. 2013. HJURP regulates cellular senescence in human fibroblasts and endothelial cells via a p53-dependent pathway. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68: 914-925.
33. Hirase S, Ozaki H, Iwasaki W. 2014. Parallel selection on gene copy number variations through evolution of three-spined stickleback genomes. BMC Genomics 15: 735.
34. Hurst JL, Payne CE, Nevison CM, Marie AD, Humphries RE, Robertson DH, Cavaggioni A, Beynon RJ. 2001. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414: 631-634.
35. Ihle S, Ravaoarimanana I, Thomas M, Tautz D. 2006. An analysis of signatures of selective sweeps in natural populations of the house mouse. Mol Biol Evol 23: 790-797.
36. Iskow RC, Gokcumen O, Lee C. 2012. Exploring the role of copy number variants in human adaptation. Trends Genet 28: 245-257.
37. Itsara A, Cooper GM, Baker C, Girirajan S, Li J, Absher D, Krauss RM, Myers RM, Ridker PM, Chasman DI, et al. 2009. Population analysis of large copy number variants and hotspots of human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 84: 148-161.
38. Jakobsson M, Scholz SW, Scheet P, Gibbs JR, VanLiere JM, Fung HC, Szpiech ZA, Degnan JH, Wang K, Guerreiro R, et al. 2008. Genotype, haplotype and copy-number variation in worldwide human populations. Nature 451: 998-1003.
39. Katju V, Bergthorsson U. 2014. Copy-number changes in evolution: rates, fitness effects and adaptive significance. Front Genet 4: 273.
40. Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, White MA, Wong K, Yalcin B, Heger A, Agam A, Slater G, Goodson M, et al. 2011. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289-294.
41. Keane TM, Wong K, Adams DJ, Flint J, Reymond A, Yalcin B. 2014. Identification of structural variation in mouse genomes. Front Genet 5: 192.
42. Kilmartin JV. 2003. Sfi1p has conserved centrin-binding sites and an essential function in budding yeast spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol 162: 1211-1221.
43. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. 2009. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 19: 1639-1645.
45. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler Transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754-1760.
46. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
47. Liu EY, Morgan AP, Chesler EJ, Wang W, Churchill GA, de Villena FP. 2014. High-resolution sex-specific linkage maps of the mouse reveal polarized distribution of crossovers in male germline. Genetics 197: 91-106.
48. Logan DW, Marton TF, Stowers L. 2008. Species specificity in major urinary proteins by parallel evolution. PLoS One 3: e3280.
49. Marchlewska-Koj A, Cavaggioni A, Mucignat-Caretta C, Olejniczak P. 2000. Stimulation of estrus in female mice by male urinary proteins. J Chem Ecol 26: 2355-2365.
50. McCarroll SA, Hadnott TN, Perry GH, Sabeti PC, Zody MC, Barrett JC, Dallaire S, Gabriel SB, Lee C, Daly MJ, et al. 2006. Common deletion polymorphisms in the human genome. Nat Genet 38: 86-92.
51. Mills RE, Walter K, Stewart C, Handsaker RE, Chen K, Alkan C, Abyzov A, Yoon SC, Ye K, Cheetham RK, et al. 2011. Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature 470: 59-65.
52. Mishra PK, Au WC, Choy JS, Kuich PH, Baker RE, Foltz DR, Basrai MA. 2011. Misregulation of Scm3p/HJURP causes chromosome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human cells. PLoS Genet 7: e1002303.
53. Montero I, Teschke M, Tautz D. 2013. Paternal imprinting of mating preferences between natural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Mol Ecol 22: 2549-2562.
54. More L. 2006. Mouse major urinary proteins trigger ovulation via the vomeronasal organ. Chem Senses 31: 393-401.
55. Neme R, Tautz D. 2014. Evolution: dynamics of de novo gene emergence. Curr Biol 24: R238-R240.
56. Nguyen D-Q, Webber C, Hehir-Kwa J, Pfundt R, Veltman J, Ponting CP. 2008. Reduced purifying selection prevails over positive selection in human copy number variant evolution. Genome Res 18: 1711-1723.
57. Orozco LD, Cokus SJ, Ghazalpour A, Ingram-Drake L, Wang S, van Nas A, Che N, Araujo JA, Pellegrini M, Lusis AJ. 2009. Copy number variation influences gene expression and metabolic traits in mice. Hum Mol Genet 18: 4118-4129.
58. Pei B, Sisu C, Frankish A, Howald C, Habegger L, Mu X, Harte R, Balasubramanian S, Tanzer A, Diekhans M, et al. 2012. The GENCODE pseudogene resource. Genome Biol 13: R51.
59. Perry GH, Tchinda J, McGrath SD, Zhang J, Picker SR, Caceres AM, Iafrate AJ, Tyler-Smith C, Scherer SW, Eichler EE. 2006. Hotspots for copy number variation in chimpanzees and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 8006-8011.
60. Perry GH, Dominy NJ, Claw KG, Lee AS, Fiegler H, Redon R, Werner J, Villanea FA, Mountain JL, Misra R, et al. 2007. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nat Genet 39: 1256-1260.
61. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26: 841-842.
62. Quinlan AR, Clark RA, Sokolova S, Leibowitz ML, Zhang Y, Hurles ME, Mell JC, Hall IM. 2010. Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome. Genome Res 20: 623-635.
63. Rajabi-Maham H, Orth A, Bonhomme F. 2008. Phylogeography and postglacial expansion of Mus musculus domesticus inferred from mitochondrial DNA coalescent, from Iran to Europe. Mol Ecol 17: 627-641.
64. Raychaudhuri S, Korn JM, McCarroll SA; International Schizophrenia Consortium, Altshuler D, Sklar P, Purcell S, Daly MJ. 2010. Accurately assessing the risk of schizophrenia conferred by rare copy-number variation affecting genes with brain function. PLoS Genet 6: e1001097.
65. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen W, et al. 2006. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444: 444-454.
66. Reichstein H, Vauk G. 1967. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Helgolander Hausmaus, Mus musculus helgolandicus Zimmermann, 1953. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 31: 386-394.
67. Scherer SW, Lee C, Birney E, Altshuler DM, Eichler EE, Carter NP, Hurles ME, Feuk L. 2007. Challenges and standards in integrating surveys of structural variation. Nat Genet 39: S7-S15.
68. Schlötterer C, Tautz D. 1994. Chromosomal homogeneity of Drosophila ribosomal DNA arrays suggests intrachromosomal exchanges drive concerted evolution. Curr Biol 4: 777-783.
69. Schrider DR, Hahn MW. 2010. Gene copy-number polymorphism in nature. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277: 3213-3221.
70. Schrider DR, Navarro FC, Galante PA, Parmigiani RB, Camargo AA, Hahn MW, de Souza SJ. 2013. Gene copy-number polymorphism caused by retrotransposition in humans. PLoS Genet 9: e1003242.
71. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J, Alexander J, Young J, Lundin P, Månér S, Massa H, Walker M, Chi M, et al. 2004. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305: 525-528.
72. Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, Cheng Z, Bailey JA, Vallente RU, Pertz LM, Clark RA, Schwartz S, Segraves R, et al. 2005. Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 77: 78-88.
73. She X, Cheng Z, Zöllner S, Church DM, Eichler EE. 2008. Mouse segmental duplication and copy number variation. Nat Genet 40: 909-914.
74. Shlien A, Tabori U, Marshall CR, Pienkowska M, Feuk L, Novokmet A, Nanda S, Druker H, Scherer SW, Malkin D. 2008. Excessive genomic DNA copy number variation in the Li-Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 11264-11269.
75. Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR. 2002. Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet 18: 74-82.
76. Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR. 2010. Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. Annu Rev Med 61: 437-455.
77. Staubach F, Lorenc A, Messer PW, Tang K, Petrov DA, Tautz D. 2012. Genome patterns of selection and introgression of haplotypes in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus). PLoS Genet 8: e1002891.
78. Steckelberg AL, Boehm V, Gromadzka AM, Gehring NH. 2012. CWC22 connects pre-mRNA splicing and exon junction complex assembly. Cell Rep 2: 454-461.
79. Stellfox ME, Bailey AO, Foltz DR. 2013. Putting CENP-A in its place. Cell Mol Life Sci 70: 387-406.
80. Stingele S, Stoehr G, Peplowska K, Cox J, Mann M, Storchova Z. 2012. Global analysis of genome, transcriptome and proteome reveals the response to aneuploidy in human cells. Mol Syst Biol 8: 608.
81. Teschke M, Mukabayire O, Wiehe T, Tautz D. 2008. Identification of selective sweeps in closely related populations of the house mouse based on microsatellite scans. Genetics 180: 1537-1545.
82. Watkins-Chow DE, Pavan WJ. 2008. Genomic copy number and expression variation within the C57BL/6J inbred mouse strain. Genome Res 18: 60-66.
83. Wong KK, deLeeuw RJ, Dosanjh NS, Kimm LR, Cheng Z, Horsman DE, MacAulay C, Ng RT, Brown CJ, Eichler EE, et al. 2007. A comprehensive analysis of common copy-number variations in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 80: 91-104.
84. Wong K, Bumpstead S, van der Weyden L, Reinholdt LG, Wilming LG, Adams DJ, Keane TM. 2012. Sequencing and characterization of the FVB/NJ mouse genome. Genome Biol 13: R72.
85. Zimmermann K. 1949. Die Hausmaus von Helgoland Mus musculus helgolandicus sspec. nov. Z Säugetierkd 17: 163-166.