A Multi-Megabase Copy Number Gain Causes Maternal Transmission Ratio Distortion on Mouse Chromosome 2

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1-29

  Didion, John P ^a,b   Morgan, Andrew P ^a,b   Clayshulte, Amelia M F ^a,b   Mcmullan, Rachel C ^a,b   Yadgary, Liran ^a   Petkov, Petko M ^c   Bell, Timothy A ^a,b   Gatti, Daniel M ^c   Crowley, James J ^a   Hua, Kunjie ^a,b   Aylor, David L ^d   Bai, Ling ^e   Calaway, Mark ^a,b   Chesler, Elissa J ^c   French, John E ^f   Geiger, Thomas R ^e   Gooch, Terry J ^a,b   Garland, Theodore ^g   Harrill, Alison H ^h   Hunter, Kent ^e   McMillan, Leonard ⁱ   Holt, Matt ⁱ   Miller, Darla R ^a,b   O'Brien, Deborah A ^a,b   Paigen, Kenneth ^c   Pan, Wenqi ^a,b   Rowe, Lucy B ^c   Shaw, Ginger D ^a,b   Simecek, Petr ^c   Sullivan, Patrick F ^a   Svenson, Karen L ^c   Weinstock, George M ^c   Threadgill, David W ^j   Pomp, Daniel ^a,b   Churchill, Gary A ^c   Pardo Manuel de Villena, Fernando ^a,b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^d NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

ⁱ Brooks Computer Science Building   (United States)

^j TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 2; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA STRUCTURE; FEMALE; GENE; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; HAPLOTYPE; INHERITANCE; LITTER SIZE; MALE; MATERNAL TRANSMISSION RATIO DISTORTION; MEIOSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROGENY; R2D GENE; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME; CROSS BREEDING; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; MUTATION;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES; CROSSES, GENETIC; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; FEMALE; GENOMICS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HAPLOTYPES; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALE; MEIOSIS; MICE; MUTATION;

EID: 84924417008     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004850     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C, (2001) Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm Genome 12: 331–339. 11331939
2. Morgan TH, Bridges CB, Sturtevant AH, (1925) The genetics of Drosophila melanogaster. Garland Publishing, Inc. 20772271
3. Gershenson S, (1928) A new sex-ratio abnormality in DROSOPHILA OBSCURA. Genetics 13: 488–507. 17246563
4. Chesley P, Dunn LC, (1936) The inheritance of Taillessness (Anury) in the house mouse. Genetics 21: 525–536. 17246810
5. Sandler L, Hiraizumi Y, Sandler I, (1959) Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. the cytogenetic basis of segregation-distortion. Genetics 44: 233–250. 17247821
6. Turner BC, Perkins DD, (1979) Spore killer, a chromosomal factor in Neurospora that kills meiotic products not containing it. Genetics 93: 587–606. 17248973
7. Lyon MF, (1984) Transmission ratio distortion in mouse t-haplotypes is due to multiple distorter genes acting on a responder locus. Cell 37: 621–628. 6722884
8. Lyttle TW, (1991) Segregation distorters. Annu Rev Genet 25: 511–557. 1812815
9. Adams D, Baldock R, Bhattacharya S, Copp AJ, Dickinson M, et al. (2013) Bloomsbury report on mouse embryo phenotyping: recommendations from the IMPC workshop on embryonic lethal screening. Dis Model Mech 6: 571–579. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011833 23519032
10. Sandler L, Novitski E, (1957) Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am. Nat: 105–110.
11. Buckler ES, Phelps-Durr TL, Buckler CS, Dawe RK, Doebley JF, et al. (1999) Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome. Genetics 153: 415–426. 10471723
12. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C, (2001) Transmission ratio distortion in offspring of heterozygous female carriers of Robertsonian translocations. Hum Genet 108: 31–36. 11214904
13. Fishman L, Willis JH, (2005) A novel meiotic drive locus almost completely distorts segregation in Mimulus (monkeyflower) hybrids. Genetics 169: 347–353. 15466426
14. Kim K, Thomas S, Howard IB, Doherty HE, Ideraabdullah FY, et al. (2005) Meiotic drive at the Om locus in wild‐derived inbred mouse strains. Bio J Linn Soc 84: 487–492.
15. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C, (2001) Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals. Genetics 159: 1179–1189. 11729161
16. Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik HS, (2001) The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293: 1098–1102. 11498581
17. Hewitt GM, (1976) Meiotic drive for B-chromosomes in the primary oocytes of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthopera: Acrididae). Chromosoma 56: 381–391. 949923
18. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Ruvinsky A JAM, (2004) Evolution of the mammalian karyotype. In: Mammalian Genomics. CABI. pp. 317–348. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2003.10.048 18969434
19. Pardo-Manuel De Villena F, de la Casa-Esperón E, Williams JW, Malette J-M, Rosa M, Sapienza C, (2000) Heritability of the maternal meiotic drive system linked to Om and high-resolution mapping of the Responder locus in mouse. Genetics 155: 283–289. 10790402
20. Ruvinsky A, (1995) Meiotic drive in female mice: an essay. Mamm Genome 6: 315–320. 7626881
21. Fishman L, Saunders A, (2008) Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322: 1559–1562. doi: 10.1126/science.1161406 19056989
22. Agulnik S, Adolph S, Winking H, Traut W, (1993) Zoogeography of the chromosome 1 HSR in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Hereditas 119: 39–46. 8244755
23. Motoo K, Kayano H, (1961) The Maintenance of supernumerary chromosomes in wild populations of Lilium callosum by preferential segregation. Genetics 46: 1699. 14456042
24. Yang H, Wang JR, Didion JP, Buus RJ, Bell TA, et al. (2011) Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet 43: 648–655. doi: 10.1038/ng.847 21623374
25. Siracusa LD, Alvord WG, Bickmore WA, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, (1991) Interspecific backcross mice show sex-specific differences in allelic inheritance. Genetics 128: 813–821. 1916246
26. Rowe LB, Nadeau JH, Turner R, Frankel WN, Letts VA, et al. (1994) Maps from two interspecific backcross DNA panels available as a community genetic mapping resource. Mamm Genome 5: 253–274. 8075499
27. Montagutelli X, Turner R, Nadeau JH, (1996) Epistatic control of non-Mendelian inheritance in mouse interspecific crosses. Genetics 143: 1739–1752. 8844160
28. Turcotte K, Loredo-Osti JC, Fortin P, Schurr E, Morgan K, et al. (2006) Complex genetic control of susceptibility to Mycobacterium bovis (Bacille Calmette-Guérin) infection in wild-derived Mus spretus mice. Genes Immun 7: 684–687. 17024129
29. Rocha JL, Eisen EJ, Siewerdt F, Vleck LD, Pomp D, (2004) A large-sample QTL study in mice: III. Reproduction. Mamm Genome 15: 878–886. 15672592
30. Swallow JG, Carter PA, Garland T, Jr (1998) Artificial selection for increased wheel-running behavior in house mice. Behavior Genetics 28: 227–237. 9670598
31. Kelly SA, Nehrenberg DL, Peirce JL, Hua K, Steffy BM, et al. (2010) Genetic architecture of voluntary exercise in an advanced intercross line of mice. Physiol Genomics 42: 190–200. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00028.2010 20388837
32. Leamy LJ, Kelly SA, Hua K, Pomp D, (2012) Exercise and diet affect quantitative trait loci for body weight and composition traits in an advanced intercross population of mice. Physiol Genomics 44: 1141–1153. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00115.2012 23048196
33. Aylor DL, Valdar W, Foulds-Mathes W, Buus RJ, Verdugo RA, et al. (2011) Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res 21: 1213–1222. doi: 10.1101/gr.111310.110 21406540
34. Durrant C, Tayem H, Yalcin B, Cleak J, Goodstadt L, et al. (2011) Collaborative Cross mice and their power to map host susceptibility to Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Genome Res 21: 1239–1248. doi: 10.1101/gr.118786.110 21493779
35. Collaborative Cross Consortium (2012) The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics 190: 389–401. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132639 22345608
36. Svenson KL, Gatti DM, Valdar W, Welsh CE, Cheng R, et al. (2012) High-resolution genetic mapping using the mouse Diversity Outbred population. Genetics 190: 437–447. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132597 22345611
37. Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, White MA, Wong K, et al. (2011) Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289–294. doi: 10.1038/nature10413 21921910
38. Yalcin B, Wong K, Agam A, Goodson M, Keane TM, et al. (2011) Sequence-based characterization of structural variation in the mouse genome. Nature 477: 326–329. doi: 10.1038/nature10432 21921916
39. Wong K, Bumpstead S, van der Weyden L, Reinholdt LG, Wilming LG, et al. (2012) Sequencing and characterization of the FVB/NJ mouse genome. Genome Biol 13: R72. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-r72 22916792
40. Liu EY, Morgan AP, Chesler EJ, Wang W, Churchill GA, et al. (2014) High-resolution sex-specific linkage maps of the mouse reveal polarized distribution of crossovers in male germline. Genetics 197: 91–106. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.161653 24578350
41. Lenormand T, Fel-Clair F, Manolakou K, Alibert P, Britton-Davidian J, (1997) Chromosomal transmission bias in laboratory hybrids between wild strains of the two European subspecies of house mice. Genetics 147: 1279–1287. 9383070
42. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, et al. (2002) Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520–562. 12466850
43. Eversley CD, Clark T, Xie Y, Steigerwalt J, Bell TA, et al. (2010) Genetic mapping and developmental timing of transmission ratio distortion in a mouse interspecific backcross. BMC Genet 11: 98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-98 21044349
44. Steckelberg A-L, Boehm V, Gromadzka AM, Gehring NH, (2012) CWC22 connects pre-mRNA splicing and exon junction complex assembly. Cell Rep 2: 454–461. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.017 22959432
45. Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, Lapp H, Ching KA, et al. (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 6062–6067. 15075390
46. Crowley JJ, Zhabotynsky V, Sun W, Huang S, Pakatci K, et al. (2015) Pervasive allelic imbalance revealed by allele-specific gene expression in highly divergent mouse crosses. Nat genet. (in press)
47. Suzuki H, Shimada T, Terashima M, Tsuchiya K, Aplin K, (2004) Temporal, spatial, and ecological modes of evolution of Eurasian Mus based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33: 626–646. 15522792
48. Song Y, Endepols S, Klemann N, Richter D, Matuschka F-R, et al. (2011) Adaptive introgression of anticoagulant rodent poison resistance by hybridization between old world mice. Curr Biol 21: 1296–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.043 21782438
49. Greene-Till R, Zhao Y, Hardies SC, (2000) Gene flow of unique sequences between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus spretus. Mamm Genome 11: 225–230. 10723728
50. Weichenhan D, Kunze B, Winking H, van Geel M, Osoegawa K, et al. (2001) Source and component genes of a 6–200 Mb gene cluster in the house mouse. Mamm Genome 12: 590–594. 11471051
51. Traut W, Rahn IM, Winking H, Kunze B, Weichehan D, (2001) Evolution of a 6–200 Mb long-range repeat cluster in the genus Mus. Chromosoma 110: 247–252. 11534816
52. Huang LO, Labbe A, Infante-Rivard C, (2013) Transmission ratio distortion: review of concept and implications for genetic association studies. Hum Genet 132: 245–263. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1257-0 23242375
53. Rogala AR, Morgan AP, Christensen AM, Gooch TJ, Bell TA, et al. (2014) The Collaborative Cross as a Resource for Modeling Human Disease: CC011/Unc, a New Mouse Model for Spontaneous Colitis. Mamm Genome 25: 95–108. doi: 10.1007/s00335-013-9499-2 24487921
54. Eisener-Dorman AF, Grabowski-Boase L, Steffy BM, Wiltshire T, Tarantino LM, (2010) Quantitative trait locus and haplotype mapping in closely related inbred strains identifies a locus for open field behavior. Mamm Genome 21: 231–246. doi: 10.1007/s00335-010-9260-z 20473506
55. Kumar V, Kim K, Joseph C, Kourrich S, Yoo S-H, et al. (2013) C57BL/6N mutation in cytoplasmic FMRP interacting protein 2 regulates cocaine response. Science 342: 1508–1512. doi: 10.1126/science.1245503 24357318
56. Gregg C, Zhang J, Butler JE, Haig D, Dulac C, (2010) Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329: 682–685. doi: 10.1126/science.1190831 20616234
57. Didion JP, Yang H, Sheppard K, Fu C-P, McMillan L, et al. (2012) Discovery of novel variants in genotyping arrays improves genotype retention and reduces ascertainment bias. BMC Genomics 13: 34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-34 22260749
58. Calaway JD, Lenarcic AB, Didion JP, Wang JR, Searle JB, et al. (2013) Genetic architecture of skewed X inactivation in the laboratory mouse. PLoS Genet 9: e1003853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003853 24098153
59. Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J, (2009) A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373–375. doi: 10.1126/science.1163601 19074312
60. Didion JP, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, (2013) Deconstructing Mus gemischus: advances in understanding ancestry, structure, and variation in the genome of the laboratory mouse. Mamm Genome 24: 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9441-z 23223940
61. Guénet J-L, bonhomme F, (2003) Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet 19: 24–31. 12493245
62. Chmátal L, Gabriel SI, Mitsainas GP, Martínez-Vargas J, Ventura J, et al. (2014) Centromere strength provides the cell biological basis for meiotic drive and karyotype evolution in mice. Curr Biol 24: 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.017 24332542
63. Kanizay LB, Albert PS, Birchler JA, Dawe RK, (2013) Intragenomic conflict between the two major knob repeats of maize. Genetics 194: 81–89. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.148882 23457233
64. Dietrich WF, Miller J, Steen R, Merchant MA, Damron-Boles D, et al. (1996) A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome. Nature 380: 149–152. 8600386
65. Rowe LB, Barter ME, Kelmenson JA, Eppig JT, (2003) The comprehensive mouse radiation hybrid map densely cross-referenced to the recombination map: a tool to support the sequence assemblies. Genome Res 13: 122–133. 12529315
66. Burgio G, Szatanik M, Guénet J-L, Arnau M-R, Panthier J-J, et al. (2007) Interspecific recombinant congenic strains between C57BL/6 and mice of the Mus spretus species: a powerful tool to dissect genetic control of complex traits. Genetics 177: 2321–2333. 17947429
67. Eisen EJ, Bandy T, (1977) Correlated responses in growth and body composition of replicated single-trait and index selected lines of mice. Theor Appl Genet 49: 133–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00281711 24407170
68. Kelly SA, Bell TA, Selitsky SR, Buus RJ, Hua K, et al. (2013) A novel intronic single nucleotide polymorphism in the myosin heavy polypeptide 4 gene is responsible for the mini-muscle phenotype characterized by major reduction in hind-limb muscle mass in mice. Genetics 195: 1385–1395. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.154476 24056412
69. Allan MF, Eisen EJ, Pomp D, (2005) Genomic mapping of direct and correlated responses to long-term selection for rapid growth rate in mice. Genetics 170: 1863–1877. 15944354
70. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, et al. (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153: 910–918. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 23643243
71. Esvelt KM, Smidler AL, Catteruccia F, Church GM, Tautz D, (2014) Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. eLife Sciences 3: e03401. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03401 25035423
72. Yang H, Ding Y, Hutchins LN, Szatkiewicz J, Bell TA, et al. (2009) A customized and versatile high-density genotyping array for the mouse. Nat Methods 6: 663–666. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1359 19668205
73. Welsh CE, McMillan L, (2012) Accelerating the inbreeding of multi-parental recombinant inbred lines generated by sibling matings. G3 2: 191–198. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.001784 22384397
74. Petkov PM, Ding Y, Cassell MA, Zhang W, Wagner G, et al. (2004) An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Genome Res 14: 1806–1811. 15342563
75. Liu EY, Zhang Q, McMillan L, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Wang W, (2010) Efficient genome ancestry inference in complex pedigrees with inbreeding. Bioinformatics 26: i199–i207. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq187 20529906
76. Kent WJ, (2002) BLAT—the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 12: 656–664. 11932250
77. Affymetrix Inc (2007) BRLMM-P: a Genotype Calling Method for the SNP 5.0 Array. http://media.affymetrix.com/support/technical/whitepapers/brlmmp_whitepaper.pdf doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm028 25506957
78. Haley CS, Knott SA, (1992) A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69: 315–324. 16718932
79. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen Ś, Churchill GA, (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19: 889–890. 12724300
80. Langmead B, Salzberg SL, (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9: 357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 22388286
81. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 19505943