Paternal imprinting of mating preferences between natural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus)

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2549-2562

  Montero, Inka ^a,b   Teschke, Meike ^a   Tautz, Diethard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

familiarity; imprinting; inbreeding; mate choice; social organization

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOME IMPRINTING; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; INBREEDING; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOUSE; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INBREEDING; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MICE; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALIA; MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS;

EID: 84876676182     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12271     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Arriaga G, Zhou EP, Jarvis ED, (2012) Of mice, birds, and men: the mouse ultrasonic song system has some features similar to humans and song-learning birds. PLoS One, 7, e46610.
2. Baker AEM, (1981a) Gene flow in house mice-behavior in a population cage. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 8, 83-90.
3. Baker AEM, (1981b) Gene flow in house mice-introduction of a new allele into free-living populations. Evolution, 35, 243-258.
4. Barnard CJ, Fitzsimons J, (1988) Kin recognition and mate choice in mice: the effects of kinship, familiarity and social interference on intersexual interaction. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1078-1090.
5. Berry RJ, Bronson FH, (1992) Life history and bioeconomy of the house mouse. Biological Reviews, 67, 519-550.
6. Brandvain Y, Van Cleve J, Ubeda F, Wilkins JF, (2011) Demography, kinship, and the evolving theory of genomic imprinting. Trends in Genetics, 27, 251-257.
7. Britton-Davidian J, Fel-Clair F, Lopez J, Alibert P, Boursot P, (2005) Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 379-393.
8. Carroll LS, Meagher S, Morrison L, Penn DJ, Potts WK, (2004) Fitness effects of a selfish gene (the Mus T complex) are revealed in an ecological context. Evolution, 58, 1318-1328.
9. Colegrave N, Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL, (2002) Mate choice or polyandry: reconciling genetic compatibility and good genes sexual selection. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 911-917.
10. Cox TP, (1984) Ethological isolation between local populations of house mices (Mus musculus) based on olfaction. Animal Behaviour, 32, 1068-1077.
11. Cox TP, (1989) Odor-based discrimination between noncontiguous demes of wild Mus. Journal of Mammalogy, 70, 549-556.
12. Cucchi T, Vigne JD, Auffray JC, (2005) First occurrence of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz & Schwarz, 1943) in the Western Mediterranean: a zooarchaeological revision of subfossil occurrences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 429-445.
13. Dean MD, Ardlie KG, Nachman MW, (2006) The frequency of multiple paternity suggests that sperm competition is common in house mice (Mus domesticus). Molecular Ecology, 15, 4141-4151.
14. DeVeale B, van der Kooy D, Babak T, (2012) Critical evaluation of imprinted gene expression by RNA-seq: a new perspective. Plos Genetics 8, e1002600.
15. Dieckmann U, Metz JAJ, Doebeli M, Tautz D, (eds) (2004) Adapative Speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Drickamer LC, Gowaty PA, Holmes CM, (2000) Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Animal Behaviour, 59, 371-378.
17. Firman RC, Simmons LW, (2008) The frequency of multiple paternity predicts variation in testes size among island populations of house mice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1524-1533.
18. Ganem G, Searle JB, (1996) Behavioural discrimination among chromosomal races of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 9, 817-830.
19. Ganem G, Litel C, Lenormand T, (2008) Variation in mate preference across a house mouse hybrid zone. Heredity, 100, 594-601.
20. Garfield AS, Cowley M, Smith FM, et al,. (2011) Distinct physiological and behavioural functions for parental alleles of imprinted Grb10. Nature, 469, 534-538.
21. Gerlach G, (1996) Emigration mechanisms in feral house mice: a laboratory investigation of the influence of social structure, population density, and aggression. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 159-170.
22. Gowaty PA, Drickamer LC, Schmid-Holmes S, (2003) Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Animal Behaviour, 65, 95-103.
23. Gregg C, Zhang JW, Butler JE, Haig D, Dulac C, (2010) Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science, 329, 682-685.
24. Haig D, (2000) Genomic imprinting, sex-biased dispersal, and social behavior. Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Reproductive Behavior, 907, 149-163.
25. Hammerschmidt K, Radyushkin K, Ehrenreich H, Fischer J, (2009) Female mice respond to male ultrasonic 'songs' with approach behaviour. Biology Letters, 5, 589-592.
26. Hammerschmidt K, Reisinger E, Westekemper K, Ehrenreich L, Strenzke N, Fischer J, (2012) Mice do not require auditory input for the normal development of their ultrasonic vocalizations. BMC Neuroscience, 13, 40.
27. Hardouin EA, Chapuis JL, Stevens MI, et al,. (2010) House mouse colonization patterns on the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen Archipelago suggest singular primary invasions and resilience against re-invasion. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10, 325.
28. Hoffmann F, Musolf K, Penn DJ, (2012) Spectrographic analyses reveal signals of individuality and kinship in the ultrasonic courtship vocalizations of wild house mice. Physiology & Behavior, 105, 766-771.
29. Hurst JL, (2009) Female recognition and assessment of males through scent. Behavioural Brain Research, 200, 295-303.
30. Ihle S, Ravaoarimanana I, Thomas M, Tautz D, (2006) An analysis of signatures of selective sweeps in natural populations of the house mouse. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 790-797.
31. Immelmann K, (1975) Ecological significance of imprinting and early learning. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 6, 15-37.
32. Irwin DE, Price T, (1999) Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity, 82, 347-354.
33. Isles AR, Baum MJ, Ma D, Szeto A, Keverne EB, Allen ND, (2002) A possible role for imprinted genes in inbreeding avoidance and dispersal from the natal area in mice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 269, 665-670.
34. Isles AR, Davies W, Wilkinson LS, (2006) Genomic imprinting and the social brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 361, 2229-2237.
35. Jacob S, McClintock MK, Zelano B, Ober C, (2002) Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor. Nature Genetics, 30, 175-179.
36. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC, (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1099-1106.
37. Kikusui T, Nakanishi K, Nakagawa R, Nagasawa M, Mogi K, Okanoya K, (2012) Cross fostering experiments suggest that mice songs are innate. PLoS One, 6, e17721.
38. Kozak GM, Boughman JW, (2009) Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 1282-1288.
39. Lenington S, Coopersmith CB, Erhart M, (1994) Female preference and variability among t-haplotypes in wild house mice. The American Naturalist, 143, 766-784.
40. Lyon MF, (2003) Transmission ratio distortion in mice. Annual Review of Genetics, 37, 393-408.
41. Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK, (1992) Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature, 360, 581-583.
42. Manser A, Lindholm AK, Konig B, Bagheri HC, (2011) Polyandry and the decrease of a selfish genetic element in a wild house mouse population. Evolution, 65, 2435-2447.
43. Meagher S, Penn DJ, Potts WK, (2000) Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 3324-3329.
44. Milinski M, (2006) The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 37, 159-186.
45. Montero I, (2010) Mate choice and reproductive strategies in recently divered populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). PhD Thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany.
46. Munclinger P, Frynta D, (1997) Relations between distant populations of Mus musculus sensu lato: Is there any odour-based discrimination? Folia Zoologica, 46, 193-199.
47. Munclinger P, Frynta D, (2000) Social interactions within and between two distant populations of house mouse. Folia Zoologica, 49, 1-6.
48. Musolf K, Hoffmann F, Penn DJ, (2010) Ultrasonic courtship vocalizations in wild house mice, Mus musculus musculus. Animal Behaviour, 79, 757-764.
49. Nomura T, Yonezawa K, (1996) A comparison of four systems of group mating for avoiding inbreeding. Genetics Selection Evolution, 28, 141-159.
50. Oakeshot JG, (1974) Social dominance, aggressiveness and mating success among male house mice (Mus musculus). Oecologia, 15, 143-158.
51. Penn DJ, Potts WK, (1999) The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. American Naturalist, 153, 145-164.
52. Portfors CV, (2007) Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 46, 28-34.
53. Pusey A, Wolf M, (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 201-206.
54. Qvarnström A, Price TD, (2001) Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 95-100.
55. Rapp G, (1972) HAN-rotation, a new system for rogorous outbreeding. Zeitschrift für Versuchstierkunde, 14, 133-142.
56. Roberts SA, Simpson DM, Armstrong SD, et al,. (2010) Darcin: a male pheromone that stimulates female memory and sexual attraction to an individual male's odour. BMC Biology 8, 75.
57. Rolland C, MacDonald DW, De Fraipont M, Berdoy M, (2003) Free female choice in house mice: leaving best for last. Behaviour, 140, 1371-1388.
58. Sherborne AL, Thom MD, Paterson S, et al,. (2007) The genetic basis of inbreeding avoidance in house mice. Current Biology, 17, 2061-2066.
59. Singleton GR, Hay DA, (1983) The effect of social organization of reproductive success and gene flow in colonies of wild house mice, Mus musculus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 49-56.
60. Smadja C, Ganem G, (2002) Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 312-320.
61. Smadja C, Ganem G, (2008) Divergence of odorant signals within and between the two European subspecies of the house mouse. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 223-230.
62. Staubach F, Lorenc A, Messer PW, Tang K, Petrov DA, Tautz D, (2012) Genome patterns of selection and introgression of haplotypes in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus). PLoS Genetics, 8, e1002891.
63. ss EI, Eroukmanoff F, Karlsson K, Runemark A, Brodin A, (2010) A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences. Evolution, 64, 3101-3113.
64. Teschke M, Mukabayire O, Wiehe T, Tautz D, (2008) Identification of selective sweeps in closely related populations of the house mouse based on microsatellite scans. Genetics, 180, 1537-1545.
65. The Marie Curie Speciation Network (2012) What do we need to know about speciation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 27-39.
66. Thom MD, Stockley P, Jury F, Ollier WE, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL, (2008) The direct assessment of genetic heterozygosity through scent in the mouse. Current Biology, 18, 619-623.
67. Tramm NA, Servedio MR, (2008) Evolution of mate-choice imprinting: competing strategies. Evolution, 62, 1991-2003.
68. Tregenza T, Wedell N, (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature, 415, 71-73.
69. Williams H, (2004) Birdsong and singing behavior. Behavioral Neurobiology of Birdsong, 1016, 1-30.
70. Wolf JB, Hager R, (2009) Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 2519-2523.
71. Wolff JO, Macdonald DW, (2004) Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 127-134.
72. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, (2001) Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1051-1063.
73. Zeigler HP, Marler P, (eds) (2004) Behavioral neurobiology of bird song. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.