Naturalistic Instructional Approaches in Early Learning: A Systematic Review

Journal of Early Intervention

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 69-97

  Snyder, Patricia A ^a   Rakap, Salih ^a   Hemmeter, Mary Louise ^b   McLaughlin, Tara W ^a   Sandall, Susan ^c   McLean, Mary E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

activity based; disability; embedded instruction; naturalistic instruction; preschool

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938867425     PISSN: 10538151     EISSN: 21543992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1053815115595461     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. R.R.G.*Apache (2005). Activity-based intervention in motor skill development. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 100, 1011-1020.
2. K.J.ArmstrongK.E.EhrhardtR.T.CoolA.Poling (1997). Social validity and treatment integrity data: Reporting in articles published in the Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 1991-1995. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 359-367.
3. L.M.*BambaraS.F.WarrenS.Komisar (1988). The individualized curriculum sequencing model: Effects on skill acquisition and generalization. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 13, 8-19.
4. D.C.*BottsA.S.LosardoC.Y.TilleryM.G.Werts (2014). A comparison of activity-based intervention and embedded direct instruction when teaching emergent literacy skills. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 120-134. doi:10.1177/0022466912449652
5. D.BrickerJ.Cripe (1992). An activity-based approach to early intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
6. C.C.*CavallaroC.L.Poulson (1985). Teaching language to handicapped children in natural settings. Education & Treatment of Children, 8, 1-24.
7. R.J.*Christensen-SandfortS.B.Whinnery (2013). Impact of milieu teaching on communication skills of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 211-222.
8. B.G.CookS.L.Odom (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135-144.
9. B.*CulattaD.KovarskyG.TheadoreA.FranklinG.Timler (2003). Quantitative and qualitative documentation of early literacy instruction. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 172-188.
10. S.*DaughertyJ.Grisham-BrownM.L.Hemmeter (2001). The effects of embedded skill instruction on the acquisition of target and nontarget skills in preschoolers with developmental delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 213-221.
11. Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
12. Division for Early Childhood/National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
13. C.J.DunstM.B.BruderC.M.TrivetteD.W.HambyM.RaabM.McLean (2001). Characteristics and consequences of everyday natural learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 68-92.
14. L.*FoxM.F.Hanline (1993). A preliminary evaluation of learning within developmentally appropriate early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13, 308-327.
15. R.GerstenL.S.FuchsD.ComptonM.CoyneC.GreenwoodM.Innocenti (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
16. H.Goldstein (2002). Communication intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 373-396.
17. H.GoldsteinK.C.LackeyN.J.B.Schneider (2014). A new framework for systematic reviews: Application to social skills interventions for preschoolers with autism. Exceptional Children, 80, 262-286. doi:10.1177/0014402914522423
18. F.M.GreshamK.A.GansleG.H.Noell (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257-263.
19. J.*Grisham-BrownK.Pretti-FrontczakS.R.HawkinsB.N.Winchell (2009). Addressing early learning standards for all children within blended preschool classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 131-142.
20. J.*Grisham-BrownR.RidgleyK.Pretti-FrontczakC.LittA.Nielson (2006). Promoting positive learning outcomes for young children in inclusive classrooms: A preliminary study of children’s progress toward pre-writing standards. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 3, 171-190.
21. J.*Grisham-BrownJ.W.SchusterM.L.HemmeterB.C.Collins (2000). Using an embedding strategy to teach preschoolers with significant disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 139-162.
22. J.W.*HalleD.M.BaerJ.E.Spradlin (1981). Teachers’ generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 389-409.
23. S.*Harjusola-WebbS.H.Robbins (2012). The effects of teacher-implemented naturalistic intervention on the communication of preschoolers with autism. Topics in Early Childhood, 32, 99-110.
24. B.M.HartT.R.Risley (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411-420.
25. M.L.Hemmeter (2000). Classroom-based interventions: Evaluating the past and looking toward the future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 56-61.
26. N.H.HeptingH.Goldstein (1996). What’s natural about naturalistic language intervention?Journal of Early Intervention, 20, 249-265.
27. E.HornR.Banerjee (2009). Understanding curriculum modifications and embedded learning opportunities in the context of supporting all children’s success. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 406-415.
28. E.*HornJ.LieberS.LiS.SandallI.Schwartz (2000). Supporting young children’s IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 208-223.
29. R.H.HornerE.G.CarrJ.HalleG.McGeeS.OdomM.Wolery (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-180.
30. C.S.HullemanD.S.Cordray (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 88-110.
31. S.*JohnstonC.NelsonJ.EvansK.Palazolo (2003). The use of visual supports in teaching young children with autism spectrum disorder to initiate interactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 86-103.
32. L.A.*KaczmarekN.H.HeptingM.Dzubak (1996). Examining the generalization of milieu language objectives in situations requiring listener preparatory behaviors. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 139-167.
33. A.P.Kaiser (1993). Parent-implemented language intervention: An environmental perspective. In A.P.KaiserD.B.Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children’s communication: Research foundations for intervention (pp. 63-84). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
34. A.P.KaiserJ.A.Trent (2009). Communication intervention for young children with disabilities: Naturalistic approaches to promoting development. In S.L.OdomR.H.HornerM.E.SnellJ.Blacher (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 224-245). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35. A.P.KaiserP.J.YoderA.Keetz (1992). The efficacy of milieu teaching. In S.F.WarrenJ.Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 63-84). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
36. F.W.*KohlerL.J.AnthonyS.A.SteighnerM.Hoyson (2001). Teaching social interaction skills in the integrated preschool: An examination of naturalistic tactics. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 103-113.
37. F.W.*KohlerP.S.StrainM.HoysonB.Jamieson (1997). Merging naturalistic teaching and peer-based strategies to address the IEP objectives of preschoolers with autism: An examination of structural and child behavior outcomes. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 196-206.
38. T.R.KratochwillJ.HitchcockR.H.HornerJ.R.LevinS.L.OdomD.M.RindskopfW.R.Shadish (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
39. K.LeLaurinM.Wolery (1992). Research standards in early intervention: Defining, describing, and measuring the independent variable. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 275-287.
40. A.*LosardoD.Bricker (1994). Activity-based intervention and direct instruction: A comparison study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 744-765.
41. M.G.*MacyD.D.Bricker (2007). Embedding individualized social goals into routine activities in inclusive early childhood classrooms. Early Child Development and Care, 177, 107-120.
42. S.*MalmskogA.P.McDonnell (1999). Teacher-mediated facilitation of engagement by children with developmental delays in inclusive preschools. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 203-216.
43. B.J.*McBrideI.S.Schwartz (2003). Effects of teaching early interventionists to use discrete trials during ongoing classroom activities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23, 5-17.
44. R.B.*McCathren (2000). Teacher-implemented prelinguistic communication intervention. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 21-29.
45. A.P.*McDonnell (1996). The acquisition, transfer, and generalization of requests by young children with severe disabilities. Education & Training in Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 31, 213-234.
46. L.L.McIntyreF.M.GreshamF.D.DiGennaroD.D.Reed (2007). Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991-2005. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 659-672.
47. J.M.*MuddM.Wolery (1987). Training Head Start teachers to use incidental teaching. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11, 124-133.
48. M.MulliganD.GuessJ.HolvoetF.Brown (1980). The individualized curriculum sequencing model (I): Implications from research on massed, distributed, or spaced trial training. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 5, 325-336.
49. N.A.*NeefJ.WaltersA.L.Egel (1984). Establishing generative yes/no responses in developmentally disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 453-460.
50. J.NohD.AllenJ.Squires (2009). Use of embedded learning opportunities within daily routines by early intervention/early childhood special education teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 24(2), 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.internationaljournalofspecialeducation.com/issues.cfm
51. S.L.Odom (2000). Preschool inclusion: What we know and where we go from here. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 20-27.
52. M.L.*OliveB.CruzT.N.DavisJ.M.ChanR.B.LangM.F.O’ReillyS.M.Dickson (2007). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505-1513.
53. C.A.*PeckC.C.KillenD.Baumgart (1989). Increasing implementation of special education instruction in mainstream preschools: Direct and generalized effects of nondirective consultation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 197-210.
54. K.Pretti-FrontczakD.Bricker (2001). Use of the embedding strategy during daily activities by early childhood education and early childhood special education teachers. Infant & Toddler Intervention: The Transdisciplinary Journal, 11, 111-128.
55. K.Pretti-FrontczakD.D.Bricker (2004). An activity-based approach to early intervention (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
56. S.RuleA.LosardoL.A.DinnebeilA.KaiserC.Rowland (1998). Research challenges in naturalistic intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 283-293.
57. M.M.*SchepisJ.B.OwnbeyM.B.ParsonsD.H.Reid (2000). Training support staff for teaching young children with disabilities in an inclusive preschool setting. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 170-178.
58. M.M.*SchepisD.H.ReidJ.OwnbeyM.B.Parsons (2001). Training support staff to embed teaching within natural routines of young children with disabilities in an inclusive preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 313-327.
59. P.Snyder (2006). Best available research evidence: Impact on research in early childhood. In V.BuysseP.W.Wesley (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field (pp. 35-70). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
60. P.SnyderM.L.HemmeterM.E.McLeanS.SandallT.McLaughlin (2013). Embedded instruction to support early learning in response-to-intervention frameworks. In V.BuysseE.Peisner-Feinberg (Eds.), Handbook of response-to-intervention in early childhood (pp. 283-298). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
61. S.*ToelkenR.G.Miltenberger (2012). Increasing independence among children diagnosed with autism using a brief embedded teaching strategy. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 93-104.
62. A.M.VanDerHeydenP.SnyderA.SmithB.SevinJ.Longwell (2005). Effects of complete learning trials on child engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25, 81-94.
63. M.L.*VennM.WoleryM.G.WertsA.MorrisL.D.DeCesareM.S.Cuffs (1993). Embedding instruction in art activities to teach preschoolers with disabilities to imitate their peers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 277-294.
64. S.F.WarrenM.E.FeyP.J.Yoder (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70-77.
65. S.F.*WarrenR.J.McQuarterA.P.Rogers-Warren (1984). The effects of mands and models on the speech of unresponsive language- delayed preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 43-52.
66. M.G.*WertsM.WoleryA.Holcombe-LigonM.A.VassilarosS.S.Billings (1992). Efficacy of transition-based teaching with instructive feedback. Education & Treatment of Children, 15, 320-334.
67. What Works Clearinghouse. (2010). WWC evidence review protocol for early childhood education interventions for children with disabilities (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/references/idocviewer/doc.aspx?docid=30
68. J.J.WheelerB.A.BaggettJ.FoxL.Blevins (2006). Treatment integrity: A review of intervention studies conducted with children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 45-54.
69. M.Wolery (2005). DEC recommended practices: Child-focused practices. In S.SandallM.L.HemmeterB.J.SmithM.E.McLean (Eds.), DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education (pp. 71-106). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
70. M.*WoleryL.AnthonyJ.Heckathorn (1998). Transition-based teaching: Effects on transitions, teachers’ behavior, and children’s learning. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 117-131.
71. M.*WoleryP.M.DoyleD.L.GastM.J.AultS.L.Simpson (1993). Comparison of progressive time delay and transition-based teaching with preschoolers who have developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 160-176.
72. M.WoleryM.L.Hemmeter (2011). Classroom instruction: Background, assumptions, and challenges. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 371-380.
73. M.M.Wolf (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
74. P.J.*YoderA.P.KaiserH.GoldsteinC.AlpertL.MousetisL.KaczmarekR.Fischer (1995). An exploratory comparison of milieu teaching and responsive interaction in classroom applications. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 218-242.