Social justice and technocracy: tracing the narratives of inclusive education in the USA

Discourse

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 582-599

  Danforth, Scot ^a  

^a CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inclusive education; technocracy; USA

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938828321     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2015.1073022     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. M.Ainscow,, T.Booth,, & A.Dyson, (2006). Inclusion and the standards agenda: Negotiating policy pressures in England. Special issue: International Inclusive Education Colloquium: critical analyses of inclusive education policy: an international survey. (Part 2). International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10, 295–308. doi:10.1080/13603110500430633
2. W.E.Akin, (1977). Technocracy and the American dream. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. G.L.Albrecht,, K.D.Seelman,, & M.Bury, (2001). Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. M.W.Apple, (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18, 12–44. doi:10.1177/0895904803260022
5. A.C.Armstrong,, D.Armstrong,, & I.Spandagou, (2009). Inclusive education: International policy and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. A.J.Artiles,, N.Harris-Murri,, & D.Rostenberg, (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45, 260–268. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4503_8
7. E.Avramidis,, P.Bayliss,, & R.Burden, (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20, 191–211. doi:10.1080/713663717
8. C.Barnes,, M.Oliver,, & L.Barton, (2002). Disability studies today. Cambridge: Polity.
9. D.Bell, (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10. D.Biklen,, & J.Burke, (2006). Presuming competence. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39, 166–175. doi:10.1080/10665680500540376
11. R.Bogdan,, & S.J.Taylor, (1994). The social meaning of mental retardation: Two life stories. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12. C.L.Bolton, (2011). Metanoia in educational leadership: An alternative perspective for school leadership. In F.W.English (Ed.), Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 223–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. E.Brantlinger, (1994). High-income and low-income adolescents’ views of special education. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9(3), 384–408. doi:10.1177/074355489493006
14. E.Brantlinger, (1997). Using ideology: Cases of non-recognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 425–459. doi: 10.3102/00346543067004425
15. E.Brantlinger, (2001). Poverty, class, and disability: A historical, social, and political perspective. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(7), 1–19.
16. E.Brantlinger, (2005). Who benefits from special education? Remediating (fixing) other people's children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. K.Burke,, & C.Sutherland, (2004). Attitudes toward inclusion: Knowledge vs. experience. Education, 125, 163–172.
18. M.A.Centeno, (1993). The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22, 307–335. doi:10.1007/BF00993531
19. E.Clarence, (2002). Technocracy reinvented: The new evidence-based policy movement. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 1–11. doi:10.1177/095207670201700301
20. D.J.Connor,, & B.A.Ferri, (2010). Learning disabilities (special issue). Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/issue/view/46 doi: 10.18061/dsq.v30i2.1229
21. L.Cremin, (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876–1957. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
22. S.Crites, (1971). The narrative quality of experience. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 39, 291–311. doi:10.1093/jaarel/XXXIX.3.291
23. G.M.Crow, (2012). Critical-Constructivist perspective on mentoring and coaching for leadership. In S.Fletcher & C.A.Mullen (Eds.), Sage handbook of mentoring and coaching in education (pp. 228–243). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Data Accountability Center. (2010). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) data. United States Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ideadata.org/PartBData.asp
25. L.J.Davis, (Ed.). (1997). The disability studies reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
26. L.J.Davis, (2002). Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism & other difficult positions. New York, NY: New York University Press.
27. J.Dewey, (1976a). Individuality, equality, and superiority. In J.A.Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (Vol. 13, pp. 295–300). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
28. J.Dewey, (1976b). Mediocrity and individuality. In J.A.Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (Vol. 13, pp. 289–294). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
29. A.Elledge,, K.C.Le Floch,, J.Taylor,, & L.Anderson, (2009). State and local implementation of the ‘No Child Left Behind Act’: Volume V – Implementation of the 1 percent rule and 2 percent interim policy options. Washington, WA: United States Department of Education.
30. D.Fink, (2005). Leadership for mortals: Developing and sustaining leaders of learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. F.Fischer, (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. D.Z.Fleischer,, & F.Zames, (2011). The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation (updated ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
33. P.Freire, (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury.
34. P.Freire, (1972). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Optimum.
35. S.Gabel, (2005). Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
36. S.Gabel,, & S.Peters, (2004). Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Disability & Society, 19, 585–600. doi:10.1080/0968759042000252515
37. E.Goffman, (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. G.Hampton, (2011). Narrative policy analysis and the use of the meta-narrative in participatory policy development within higher education. Higher Education Policy, 24, 347–358. doi:10.1057/hep.2011.8
39. M.L.Hardman,, & S.Dawson, (2008). The impact of federal public policy on curriculum & instruction for students with disabilities in the general classroom. Preventing School Failure, 52, 5–11. doi:10.3200/PSFL.52.2.5-11
40. B.Harry,, & M.G.Anderson, (1994). The disproportionate placement of African American males in special education programs: A critique of the process. The Journal of Negro Education, 63(4), 602–619. doi: 10.2307/2967298
41. B.Harry,, J.K.Klingner,, K.M.Sturges,, & R.F.Moore, (2002). Of rocks and soft places: Using qualitative methods to investigate disproportionality. In D.Losen & G.Orfield (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 71–92). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University and the Harvard Education Press.
42. T.Hehir, (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education.
43. G.Howard, (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 46, 187–197. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.3.187
44. M.W.Kamens,, S.J.Loprete,, & F.A.Slostad, (2000). Classroom teachers’ perceptions about inclusion and preservice teacher education. Teaching Education, 11, 147–158. doi:10.1080/713698971
45. H.Kleinert,, J.Kearns,, & S.Kennedy, (1997). Accountability for all students: Kentucky's Alternate Portfolio system for students with moderate and severe cognitive disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 88–101. doi:10.1177/154079699702200206
46. C.Kliewer, (1998). Schooling children with Down Syndrome: Toward an understanding of possibility. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47. S.Linton, (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York, NY: New York University Press.
48. D.K.Lipsky,, & A.Gartner, (1996). Inclusion, school restructuring, and the remaking of American society. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 762–797. doi: 10.17763/haer.66.4.3686k7x734246430
49. D.Losen,, & G.Orfield, (Eds.). (2002). Racial inequity in special education. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University and the Harvard Education Press.
50. J.Martin, (2002). The education of John Dewey: A biography. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
51. M.K.McBeth,, E.A.Shanahan,, & P.L.Hathaway, (2007). The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory. Policy Studies Journal, 35, 87–108. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00208.x
52. G.McCulloch, (2002). Philosophers and kings: Education for leadership in modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. P.McLaren, (1998). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. White Plains, NY: Longman.
54. J.Meynaud, (1969). Technocracy. New York, NY: Free Press.
55. K.Nagle,, C.Yunker,, & K.W.Malmgren, (2006). Students with disabilities and accountability reform: Challenges identified at the state and local levels. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17, 28–39. doi:10.1177/10442073060170010301
56. M.Oliver, (1990). The politics of disablement. London: MacMillan.
57. R.L.Osgood, (2005). The history of inclusion in the United States. Washington, WA: Gallaudet University Press.
58. F.Pelka, (1997). The ABC-CLIO companion to the disability rights movement. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
59. D.C.Phillips, (1983). After the wake: Postpositivistic educational thought. Educational Researcher, 12(5), 4–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X012005004
60. D.C.Phillips,, & N.C.Burbules, (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
61. A.G.Picciano,, & J.Spring, (2012). The great American education-industrial complex: Ideology, technology, and profit. New York, NY: Routledge.
62. R.D.Putnam, (1977). Elite transformation in advanced industrial societies: An empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy. Comparative Political Studies, 10, 383–412. doi:10.1177/001041407701000305
63. D.Ravitch, (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
64. E.Roe, (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
65. A.Ryan, (1997). John Dewey and the high tide of American liberalism. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
66. K.J.Saltman,, & D.A.Gabbard, (2010). Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
67. M.Sapon-Shevin, (1999). Because we can change the world: A practical guide to building cooperative, inclusive classroom communities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
68. M.Sapon-Shevin, (2003). Inclusion: A matter of social justice – How can we create schools that will help students thrive in a diverse society?. Education Leadership, 61(2), 25–28.
69. E.T.Savarese,, & R.J.Savarese, (2010). Autism and the concept of neurodiversity (special issue). Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(1). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/issue/view/43
70. H.Scott, (1933). Introduction to technocracy. New York, NY: John Day Company.
71. H.P.Segal, (1985). Technological utopianism in American culture. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
72. J.P.Shapiro, (1994). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York, NY: Times Books.
73. R.J.Skiba,, L.Poloni-Staudinger,, S.Gallini,, A.B.Simmons,, & L.R.Feggins-Azziz, (2006). Disparate access: The disproportionality of African-American students with disabilities across educational environments. Exceptional Children, 72, 411–424. doi:10.1177/001440290607200402
74. R.Slee, (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. New York, NY: Routledge.
75. P.Smith, (2007). Have we made any progress? Including students with intellectual disabilities in regular education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 297–309. doi:10.1352/0047-6765
76. P.Smith, (2010). Whatever happened to inclusion? The place of students with intellectual disabilities in education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
77. J.Smyth, (2005). Critical perspectives on educational leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.
78. J.Spring, (1972). Education and the rise of the corporate state. Boston, MA: Beacon.
79. P.J.Stanovich,, & A.Jordan, (2002). Preparing general educators to teach in inclusive classrooms: Some food for thought. Teacher Educator, 37, 173–185. doi:10.1080/08878730209555292
80. D.Stroman, (2003). The disability rights movement: From deinstitutionalization to self-determination. Lanham, MD: UP of America.
81. P.M.Taubman, (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
82. Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1975). Fundamental principles of disability. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/fundamental%20principles.pdf
83. United States Department of Education. (2004). Twenty-Sixth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, WA: Prepared by Westat for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services U.S. Department of Education.
84. T.Veblen, (1921). The engineers and the price system. New York, NY: B.W. Huebsch.
85. W.H.Watkins, (2011). The assault on public education: Confronting the politics of corporate school reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
86. R.F.Westbrook, (1993). John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
87. K.K.Wong, (2008). Federalism, equity, and accountability in education. In B.S.Cooper, J.G.Cibulka, & L.D.Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 19–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
88. D.Yanow, (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
89. J.Ysseldyke,, A.Dennison,, & R.Nelson, (2004). Large-scale assessment and accountability systems: Positive consequences for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 51). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center for Educational Outcomes.