Federalism, Equity, and Accountability in Education

Handbook of Education Politics and Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 19-29

  Wong, Kenneth K ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145522333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203887875-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. de Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America. (H. Mansfield and D. Winthrop, Trans. and Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Greene, J. P., and Winters, M. A. (2006). Getting ahead by staying behind. Education Next, 6(2), 67-70.
3. Hall, D., Weiner, R., and Carey, K. (2003). What new “AYP” information tells us about schools, states, and public education. Washington DC: The Education Trust.
4. Hamilton, A., Madison, J., and Jay, J. (1961). The Federalist papers. New York: Mentor Press.
5. Hochschild, J., and Scovronick, N. (2003). The American dream and the public schools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Janofsky, M. (2005). Judge rejects challenge to Bush education law. New York Times, November 24, 2005, A14.
7. Lee, J. Y., and Wong, K. K. (2004). The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 797-832.
8. Manna, P. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9. Marsh, J., Kerr, K., Ikemoto, G., and Darilek, H. (2006). Developing district-intermediary partnerships to promote instructional improvement: Early experiences and lessons about the Institute for Learning. In K. Wong and S. Rutledge (Eds.), System-wide efforts to improve student achievement (pp. 241-270). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
10. Martin, R. and McClure, P. (1969). Title I of ESEA: Is it helping poor children? Washington DC: Washington Research Project of the Southern Center for Studies in Public Policy and the NAACP Legal Defense of Education Fund.
11. McCabe, M. (2006, January 5). State of the states. Quality Counts at 10. Bethesda, MD: Education Week.
12. Meier, K., Stewart, J., and England, R. (1989). Race, class and education. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Murphy, J. (1971). Title I of ESEA: The politics of implementing federal education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 41(1), 36-63.
14. National School Boards Foundation. (1999). Leadership Matters: Transforming Urban School Boards. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Foundation.
15. Peterson, P. E., Rabe, B. G., and Wong, K. K. (1988). The evolution of the compensatory education program. In D. P. Doyle and B. S. Cooper (Eds.), Federal aid to the disadvantaged: What future for Chapter 1? (pp. 33-60). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
16. Roeber, E. D. (2002). Appropriate inclusion of students with disabilities in state accountability systems. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
17. Stone, C. et al. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18. Sundquist, J. (1968). Politics and policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
19. Vanourek, G. (2005). State of the charter movement: Trends, issues, and indicators. Washington DC: Charter School Leadership Council.
20. Wolf, P. et al. (2005). Evaluation of the DC opportunity scholarship program: First year report on participation, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Wong, K. K. (1999). Funding public schools: Politics and policy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
22. Wong, K. K. (2006). The political dynamics of mayoral engagement in public education. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 164-177.
23. Wong, K. K., and Nicotera, A. (2007). Successful schools and educational accountability. Boston: Pearson Education.