Tissue-specific evolution of protein coding genes in human and mouse

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Kryuchkova Mostacci, Nadezda ^a,b   Robinson Rechavi, Marc ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; FEMALE; GENE AGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE LOCATION; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC SELECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE SELECTION; PURIFYING SELECTION; RNA SEQUENCE; TESTIS; TISSUE SPECIFIC EVOLUTION; TISSUE SPECIFICITY; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GENOMICS; NUCLEIC ACID DATABASE; OPEN READING FRAME; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MICE; OPEN READING FRAMES; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84938613240     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131673     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Rocha EPC. The quest for the universals of protein evolution. Trends Genet. 2006; 22:412-6. PMID: 16808987
2. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006; 7:337-48. PMID: 16619049
3. Rocha EPC, Danchin A. An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004; 21:108-16. PMID: 14595100
4. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005; 102:14338-43. PMID: 16176987
5. Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD. Highly Expressed Genes in Yeast Evolve Slowly. Genetics. 2001; 158:927-31. PMID: 11430355
6. Wall DP, Hirsh AE, Fraser HB, Kumm J, Giaever G, Eisen MB, et al. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005; 102:5483-8. PMID: 15800036
7. Larracuente AM, Sackton TB, Greenberg AJ, Wong A, Singh ND, Sturgill D, et al. Evolution of protein-coding genes in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 2008; 24:114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.001 PMID: 18249460
8. Makino T, Hokamp K, McLysaght A. The complex relationship of gene duplication and essentiality. Trends Genet. 2009; 25:147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.001 PMID: 19285746
9. Yang L, Gaut BS. Factors that contribute to variation in evolutionary rate among Arabidopsis genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011; 28:2359-69. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr058 PMID: 21389272
10. Liao B-Y, Scott NM, Zhang J. Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006; 23:2072-80. PMID: 16887903
11. Li S-W, Feng L, Niu D-K. Selection for the miniaturization of highly expressed genes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007; 360:586-92. PMID: 17610841
12. Duret L, Mouchiroud D. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000; 17:68-74. PMID: 10666707
13. Park SG, Choi SS. Expression breadth and expression abundance behave differently in correlations with evolutionary rates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010; 10:241. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-241 PMID: 20691101
14. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell. 2008; 134:341-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.042 PMID: 18662548
15. Warnefors M, Kaessmann H. Evolution of the Correlation Between Expression Divergence and Protein Divergence in Mammals. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013; 5:1324-35. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt093 PMID: 23781097
16. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005; 22:2472-9. PMID: 16107592
17. The ENCODE Project Consortium. A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE). PLoS Biol. 2011; 9:e1001046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001046 PMID: 21526222
18. Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Oksvold P, Kampf C, Djureinovic D, Odeberg J, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2013;
19. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. Nature Publishing Group; 2012; 7:562-78.
20. Flicek P, Ahmed I, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:D48-55. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1236 PMID: 23203987
21. Rustici G, Kolesnikov N, Brandizi M, Burdett T, Dylag M, Emam I, et al. ArrayExpress update - trends in database growth and links to data analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:D987-90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1174 PMID: 23193272
22. Yanai I, Benjamin H, Shmoish M, Chalifa-Caspi V, Shklar M, Ophir R, et al. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21:650-9. PMID: 15388519
23. Bastian F, Parmentier G, Roux J. Bgee: integrating and comparing heterogeneous transcriptome data among species. Data Integr. Life Sci. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. p. 124-31.
24. Brawand D, Soumillon M, Necsulea A, Julien P, Csárdi G, Harrigan P, et al. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature. 2011; 478:343-8. doi: 10.1038/nature10532 PMID: 22012392
25. Moretti S, Laurenczy B, Gharib WH, Castella B, Kuzniar A, Schabauer H, et al. Selectome update: quality control and computational improvements to a database of positive selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D917-21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1065 PMID: 24225318
26. Rodriguez JM, Maietta P, Ezkurdia I, Pietrelli A, Wesselink J-J, Lopez G, et al. APPRIS: annotation of principal and alternative splice isoforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:D110-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1058 PMID: 23161672
27. Ezkurdia I, Juan D, Rodriguez JM, Frankish A, Diekhans M, Harrow J, et al. Multiple evidence strands suggest that there may be as few as 19,000 human protein-coding genes. Hum. Mol. .... 2014;1-45.
28. McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM® [Internet]. John Hopkins Univ. (Baltimore MD). 2014.
29. Blake J, Bult C, Eppig J, Kadin J, Richardson J, Group TMGD. The Mouse Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014. p. 42(D1):D810-7.
30. Chen W-H, Minguez P, Lercher MJ, Bork P. OGEE: an online gene essentiality database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:D901-6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr986 PMID: 22075992
31. Cox A, Ackert-Bicknell CL, Dumont BL, Ding Y, Bell JT, Brockmann G a, et al. A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse. Genetics. 2009; 182:1335-44. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.105486 PMID: 19535546
32. Canal L. A normal approximation for the chi-square distribution. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005; 48:803-8.
33. Roux J, Privman E, Moretti S, Daub JT, Robinson-Rechavi M, Keller L. Patterns of positive selection in seven ant genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014; 31:1661-85. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu141 PMID: 24782441
34. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2012.
35. Sarcar D. Lattice: Multivariate data visualization with R [Internet]. New York: Springer; 2008.
36. Wickham H. The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data. J. Stat. Softw. 2011; 40:1-29.
37. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003; 13:2498-504. PMID: 14597658
38. Shannon PT, Grimes M, Kutlu B, Bot JJ, Galas DJ. RCytoscape: tools for exploratory network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14:217.
39. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009; 19:1639-45. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109 PMID: 19541911
40. Kuma K, Iwabe N, Miyata T. Functional Constraints against Variations on Molecules from the Tissue Level: Slowly Evolving Brain-Specific Genes Demonstrated by Protein Kinase and Immunoglobulin SupergeneFamilies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995; 12:123-30. PMID: 7877487
41. Khaitovich P, Enard W, Lachmann M, Pääbo S. Evolution of primate gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006; 7:693-702. PMID: 16921347
42. Tuller T, Kupiec M, Ruppin E. Evolutionary rate and gene expression across different brain regions. Genome Biol. 2008; 9:R142. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r142 PMID: 18811952
43. Roux J, Robinson-Rechavi M. Age-dependent gain of alternative splice forms and biased duplication explain the relation between splicing and duplication. Genome Res. 2011; 21:357-63. doi: 10.1101/gr.113803.110 PMID: 21173032
44. Albà MM, Castresana J. Inverse relationship between evolutionary rate and age of mammalian genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005; 22:598-606. PMID: 15537804
45. Albà MM, Castresana J. On homology searches by protein Blast and the characterization of the age of genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007; 7:53. PMID: 17408474
46. Elhaik E, Sabath N, Graur D. The "inverse relationship between evolutionary rate and age of mammalian genes" is an artifact of increased genetic distance with rate of evolution and time of divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006; 23:1-3. PMID: 16151190
47. Brunet FG, Roest Crollius H, Paris M, Aury J-M, Gibert P, Jaillon O, et al. Gene loss and evolutionary rates following whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006; 23:1808-16. PMID: 16809621
48. Davis JC, Petrov D a. Preferential duplication of conserved proteins in eukaryotic genomes. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2:E55. PMID: 15024414
49. Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin E V. Duplicated genes evolve slower than singletons despite the initial rate increase. BMC Evol. Biol. 2004; 4:22. PMID: 15238160
50. Satake M, Kawata M, McLysaght A, Makino T. Evolution of Vertebrate Tissues Driven by Differential Modes of Gene Duplication. DNA Res. 2012;1-12.
51. Urrutia A, Hurst L. The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. Genome Res. 2003;2260-4. PMID: 12975314
52. Risso D, Schwartz K, Sherlock G, Dudoit S. GC-Content Normalization for RNA-Seq Data. BMC Bioinformatics. BioMed Central Ltd; 2011; 12:480.
53. Benjamini Y, Speed TP. Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:1-14. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks001 PMID: 22323520
54. Wang C, Gong B, Bushel PR, Thierry-Mieg J, Thierry-Mieg D, Xu J, et al. The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;
55. Rubinstein ND, Doron-Faigenboim A, Mayrose I, Pupko T. Evolutionary models accounting for layers of selection in protein-coding genes and their impact on the inference of positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011; 28:3297-308. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr162 PMID: 21690564
56. Macossay-Castillo M, Kosol S, Tompa P, Pancsa R. Synonymous constraint elements show a tendency to encode intrinsically disordered protein segments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014; 10:e1003607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003607 PMID: 24809503
57. Dimitrieva S, Anisimova M. Unraveling Patterns of Site-to-Site Synonymous Rates Variation and Associated Gene Properties of Protein Domains and Families. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e95034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095034 PMID: 24896293
58. Murrell B, Wertheim JO, Moola S, Weighill T, Scheffler K, Kosakovsky Pond SL. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genet. 2012; 8:e1002764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002764 PMID: 22807683
59. Zaheri M, Dib L, Salamin N. A Generalized Mechanistic Codon Model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014; 31: 2528-41. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu196 PMID: 24958740
60. Moyers BA, Zhang J. Phylostratigraphic bias creates spurious patterns of genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014;734-63.
61. Montoya-Burgos JI, Boursot P, Galtier N. Recombination explains isochores in mammalian genomes. Trends Genet. 2003; 19:128-30. PMID: 12615004
62. Galtier N, Duret L, Glémin S, Ranwez V. GC-biased gene conversion promotes the fixation of deleterious amino acid changes in primates. Trends Genet. 2009; 25:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.10.011 PMID: 19027980
63. Bullaughey K, Przeworski M, Coop G. No effect of recombination on the efficacy of natural selection in primates. Genome Res. 2008; 18:544-54. doi: 10.1101/gr.071548.107 PMID: 18199888
64. Glémin S, Arndt PF, Messer PW, Petrov D, Galtier N. Quantification of GC-biased gene conversion in the human genome Quantification of GC-biased gene conversion in the human genome. 2014;
65. Duret L, Mouchiroud D, Gautier C. Statistical analysis of vertebrate sequences reveals that long genes are scarce in GC-rich isochores. J. Mol. Evol. 1995; 40:308-17. PMID: 7723057
66. Subramanian S, Kumar S. Gene expression intensity shapes evolutionary rates of the proteins encoded by the vertebrate genome. Genetics. 2004; 168:373-81. PMID: 15454550
67. Liao B-Y, Zhang J. Low rates of expression profile divergence in highly expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006; 23:1119-28. PMID: 16520335
68. Gu X, Su Z. Tissue-driven hypothesis of genomic evolution and sequence-expression correlations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007; 104:2779-84. PMID: 17301236
69. Haygood R, Babbitt CC, Fedrigo O, Wray G a. Contrasts between adaptive coding and noncoding changes during human evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010; 107:7853-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911249107 PMID: 20385805
70. Chen J, Sun M, Rowley JD, Hurst LD. The small introns of antisense genes are better explained by selection for rapid transcription than by "genomic design". Genetics. 2005; 171:2151-5. PMID: 16143605
71. Gonzalez-Porta M, Frankish A, Rung J, Harrow J, Brazma A. Transcriptome analysis of human tissues and cell lines reveals one dominant transcript per gene. Genome Biol. 2013; 14:R70. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r70 PMID: 23815980
72. Lahens NF, Kavakli IH, Zhang R, Hayer K, Black MB, Dueck H, et al. IVT-seq reveals extreme bias in RNA-sequencing. Genome Biol. 2014; 15:R86. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r86 PMID: 24981968
73. Cho H, Davis J, Li X, Smith KS, Battle A, Montgomery SB. High-Resolution Transcriptome Analysis with Long-Read RNA Sequencing. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e108095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108095 PMID: 25251678
74. Necsulea A, Kaessmann H. Evolutionary dynamics of coding and non-coding transcriptomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. Nature Publishing Group; 2014;
75. Gilad Y, Oshlack A, Smyth GK, Speed TP, White KP. Expression profiling in primates reveals a rapid evolution of human transcription factors. Nature. 2006; 440:242-5. PMID: 16525476
76. Blekhman R, Marioni JC, Zumbo P, Stephens M, Gilad Y. Sex-specific and lineage-specific alternative splicing in primates. Genome Res. 2010; 20:180-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.099226.109 PMID: 20009012
77. Enard W, Khaitovich P, Klose J, Zöllner S. Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns. Science (80-.). 2002; 296:340-3.
78. Villar D, Berthelot C, Flicek P, Odom DT, Villar D, Berthelot C, et al. Enhancer Evolution across 20 Mammalian Species. Cell. The Authors; 2015; 160:554-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.006 PMID: 25635462