Procedural injustice in the system of peer review and scientific misconduct

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 159-172

  Clair, Judith A ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938577564     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2013.0243     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. 1979. Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44: 636-655.
2. Ambrose, M. L., Seabright,M. A., & Schminke,M. 2002. Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 947-965.
3. Andersson, L. M. 1996. Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49: 1395-1418.
4. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. 1997. Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 449-469.
5. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. 1999. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24: 452-471.
6. Aram, J., & Salipante, P. 1981. An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict. Academy of Management Review, 6: 197-204.
7. Associated Press. 2011. Harvard professor responsible for scientific misconduct resigns. http://www.wbur.org/2011/07/19/harvard-professor-resigns. Accessed 3/15/15.
8. Aquino, K., & Reed, A., II. 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 1423-1440.
9. Baum, J. A. 2012. The skewed few: Does "skew" signal quality among journals, articles, and academics? Journal of Management Inquiry, 21: 349-354.
10. Baumeister, R. F. 1984. Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 610-620.
11. Bedeian, A. G. 1996. Thoughts on the making and remaking of the management discipline. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5: 311-318.
12. Bedeian, A. G. 2003. The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12: 331-338.
13. Bedeian, A. G. 2004. Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3: 198-216.
14. Bedeian, A. G. 2008. Balancing authorial voice and editorial omniscience: The ''it's my paper and I'll say what I want to" versus ''ghostwriters in the sky''minuet. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 134-142. Palgrave MacMillan.
15. Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., & Miller, A. N. 2010. Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 715-725.
16. Benos, D. J., Bashari, E., & Chaves, J. M. 2007. The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education, 31: 145-152.
17. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. 2003. What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Human Resource Management Review, 13: 107-126.
18. Budd, J. M., Sievert, M., Schultz, T. R., & Scoville, C. 1999. Effects of article retraction on citation and practice inmedicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, October, 874: 437-443.
19. Burris, E. R. 2012. The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 851-875.
20. Chalmers, I. 1990. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263: 1405-1408.
21. Chamberlain, N. W., & Kuhn, J. W. 1986. Collective bargaining. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Clair, J. A. 2015. Towards a bill of rights for manuscript submitters. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14: 111-131.
23. Clark, T., & Wright, M. 2007. Reviewing journal rankings and revisiting peer reviews: Editorial perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 612-621.
24. Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., &Vogel, B. 2006. Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 463-484.
25. Cooper, L. 2009. Problems, pitfalls, and promise in the peer-review process. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4: 84-90.
26. Cortina, L., & Magley, V. J. 2003. Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8: 247-265.
27. Cotton, C. C. 1977. Marginality-A neglected dimension in the design of work. Academy of Management Review, 2: 133-138.
28. Council of Science Editors. 2012. White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. http://www.councilscienceeditors. org/i4a/pages/index.cfm? pageid?3331. Accessed 3/16/2015.
29. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gililand, S. W. 2007. The management of organizational justice. The Academy of Management Perspectives, (November): 34-48.
30. Cullen, B. T., & Pretes, M. 2000. The meaning of marginality: Interpretations and perceptions in social science. The Social Science Journal, 37: 215-229.
31. Davidoff, F., DeAngelis, C. D., & Drazen, J. M., et al. 2001. Sponsorship, authorship and accountability. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286: 1232-1234.
32. Dean, J., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. 1998. Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23: 341-352.
33. Damon, W., & Hart, D. 1992. Self-understanding and its role in social and moral development. In M. H. Bornstein & E. Michael (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (3rd ed.): 421-464. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
34. De Rond, M., & Miller, A. N. 2005. Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14: 321-329.
35. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. 2002. Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53: 161-186.
36. Editing, Ethical 2012. COPE, 4: 1-13.
37. Erikson, E. H. 1964. Insight and responsibility. New York: Norton.
38. Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. 2012. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 17028-17033.
39. Fanelli, D. 2009. How many scholars fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5).
40. Franzen, M., Rotter, S., & Weingart, P. 2007. Fraud: Causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. EMBO Reports, 8: 3-7.
41. Greenberg, J. 1990. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequality: The hidden costs of pay cuts. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 561-578.
42. Greenberg, J. 1993. Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54: 81-103.
43. Grover, S. L., & Hui, C. 1994. The influence of role conflict and selfinterest on lying in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 13: 295-303.
44. Harrison, D. 2002. Obligations and obfuscations in the review process. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1079-1084.
45. Honig, B., & Bedi, A. 2012. The fox in the henhouse: A critical examination of plagiarism among members of the Academy of Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11: 101-123.
46. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 2013a. Retraction of Stapel and Van der Zee 2006. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 104: 195-195.
47. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 2013b. Retraction of Marx and Stapel 2006. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 104: 196-195.
48. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 2013c. Retraction of Stapel and Semin 2007. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 104: 197-197.
49. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 2013d. Retraction of Blanton and Stapel 2008. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 104: 198-198.
50. Kuhn, J. W. 1961. Bargaining in grievance settlement: The power of industrial work groups. Columbia University Press.
51. Kyete, M. 1999. Quantifying workplace due process-an initial construct. Current Research in Industrial Relations, 2: 69-81.
52. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: 27-55. New York: Plenum.
53. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
54. Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. 1997. Procedural context and cuture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73: 767-780.
55. MacDonald, S., & Kam, K. 2007. Ring a ring o' roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 640-655.
56. Mahoney, M. J. 1977. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1: 161-175.
57. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & de Vries, R. 2006. Scholars' perceptions of organizational justice and selfreported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics; JERHRE, 1: 51-66.
58. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. 2005. Scholars behaving badly. Nature, 435: 737-738.
59. Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., de Vries, R., & Anderson, M. S. 2010. The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics; JERHRE, 5: 67-83.
60. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. 2001. Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11: 219-232.
61. Miller, C. 2006. Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: Prevalence and effects of reviewer hostility, bias, and dissensus. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 425-431.
62. Michalek, A. M., Hutson, A. D., Wicher, C. P., & Trump, D. L. 2010. The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: A case study. PLoS Medicine, 7(8).
63. Peach, D. A., & Livernash, E. R. 1974. Grievance initiation and resolution: A study in basic steel. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
64. Peterson, R. B., & Lewin, D. 1990. The nonunion grievance procedure: A viable system of due process? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3: 1-18.
65. Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. 1982. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5: 4-17.
66. Raelin, J. A. 2008. Refereeing the game of peer review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 124-129.
67. Rennie, D., & Gunsalus, C. K. 1993. Scientific misconduct: New definition, procedures, and office - perhaps a new leaf. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269(7): 915-917.
68. Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. 2009. Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50: 293-313.
69. Rosenberg, R. S. 1998. Beyond the code of ethics: The responsibility of professional societies. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 28: 18-25.
70. Roth, W. M. 2002. Editorial power/authorial suffering. Research in Science Education, 32: 215-240.
71. Schminke, M. 2009. Editor's comments: The better angels of our nature-ethics and integrity in the publishing process. Academy of Management Review, 34: 586-591.
72. Schwartz, S. J., & Zamboanga, B. L. 2009. The peer-review and editorial system: Ways to fix something that might be broken. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 54-61.
73. Schweitzer, M. E., Ordonez, L., & Douma, B. 2004. Goal setting as a motivator for unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 422-432.
74. Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. 1987. Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1: 161-176.
75. Steers, R.,&Porter, L. W. 1991. Motivation and work behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
76. Storbeck,O. 2011. Bruno Frey: More cases of self-plagarism unveiled. Economics Intelligence, http://economicsintelligence.com/2011/09/12/bruno-frey-more-cases-of-self-plagiarism-unveiled/. Accessed 3/16/2015.
77. The Committee on Publication Ethics. 1999. The COPE Report 1999: Guidelines on good publication practice. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
78. Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., & Rhoades, L. J. 2008. Repairing research integrity. Nature, 453: 980-982.
79. Tosi, H. 2009. It's about time!!!!: What to do about long delays in the review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18: 175-178.
80. Trafimow, D., & Rice, S. 2009. What if social scholars had reviewed great scientific works of the past? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4: 65-78.
81. Travis, G. D. L., & Collins, H. M. 1991. New light on old boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16: 322-341.
82. Trevino, L. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11: 601-617.
83. Tsang, E. W. K., & Frey, B. S. 2007. The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6: 128-136.
84. Tsui, A. S., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 2007. Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 12: 259-275.
85. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. 1990. Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology in business settings: 77-98. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Inc.
86. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. 2000. Cooperation in groups. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
87. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. 2003. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 349-361.
88. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. 1997. Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
89. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. 2000. Procedural justice. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law: 65-92. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
90. VanDyne, L.,Graham, J. W.,&Dienesch,R.M. 1994. Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy ofManagement Journal, 37: 765-802.
91. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. F., & Austin, J. T. 1997. Cynicism about organizational change measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group & Organization Management, 25: 132-153.
92. Wellington, J., & Nixon, J. 2005. Shaping the field: The role of academic journal editors in the construction of education as a field of study. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26: 643-655.
93. Woolf, E. 1986. Users of accounts want more than just true and fair. Accountancy, 97: 119-122.
94. Youngblood, S. A., Trevino, L. K., & Favia, M. 1992. Reactions to unjust dismissal and third-party dispute resolution: A justice framework. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5: 283-307.