The Peer-Review and Editorial System: Ways to Fix Something That Might Be Broken

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 54-61

  Schwartz, Seth J ^a   Zamboanga, Byron L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 66249128356     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01106.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Summary report of journal operations: 2005.American Psychologist. 2006;61:559-560.
2. Anderson N.B.Editorial policies of the American Psychologist.American Psychologist. 2006;61:1-9.
3. Arnett J.J.The vitality criterion: A new standard for publication in the Journal of Adolescent Research.Journal of Adolescent Research. 2005;20:3-7.
4. Baker D.The peer review process in science education journals.Research in Science Education. 2002;32:171-180.
5. Brown R.T.Editorial A general approach to publication in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology: From the process of preparing your manuscript to revisions and resubmissions.Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2004;29:1-5.
6. Cummings P.,Rivara F.P.Responding to reviewers' comments on submitted articles.Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2002;156:105-107.
7. Diener E.Editorial.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1:1-4.
8. Eisenhart M.The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little?.Research in Science Education. 2002;32:241-255.
9. Foster R.L.Editorial: A primer on peer review.Journal of Specialists in Pediatric Nursing. 2007;13:1-3.
10. Gueorguieva R.,Krystal J.H.Move over ANOVA: Progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.Archives of General Psychiatry. 2004;61:310-317.
11. Hojat M.,Gonnella J.S.,Calleigh A.S.Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process.Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2003;8:75-96.
12. Journal of Adolescent Health(2007).Guide for authors. Retrieved June 14, 2008, fromhttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505765/authorinstructions.
13. Kaplan D.How to fix peer review: Separating its two functions- improving manuscripts and judging their scientific merit-would help.Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2005;14:321-323.
14. Keiley M.K.,Martin N.C.Survival analysis in family research.Journal of Family Psychology. 2005;19:142-156.
15. Kumashiro K.Thinking collaboratively about the peer-review process for journal-article publication.Harvard Educational Review. 2005;75:257-266.
16. Levesque R.J.R.Reporting empirical research on adolescence: Reflections on the appeal of coherence, purpose, and responsibility.Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2006;35:1-9.
17. National Council on Family Relations(2006).Journal of Marriage and Family Web site. Retrieved May 15, 2008, fromhttp://secure.ncfr.com/journals/marriage_family/home.asp.
18. Raelin J.A.Refereeing the game of peer review.Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2008;7:124-129.
19. Roth W.-M.Editorial power/authorial suffering.Research in Science Education. 2002;32:215-240.
20. Ryan R.M.,Deci E.L.On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.Annual Review of Psychology. 2001;52:141-166.
21. SieberJ.(2006).Quality and value: How can we research peer review?Nature. Retrieved June 14, 2008, fromhttp://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05006.html.
22. Tabachnick B.G.,Fidell L.S.Using multivariate statistics. 5th edBoston: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
23. Tsang E.W.K.,Frey B.S.The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas.Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2007;6:28-36.
24. Weston R.,Gore P.A.A brief guide to structural equation modeling.Counseling Psychologist. 2006;34:719-751.