Obligations and obfuscations in the review process

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1079-1084

  Harrison, David ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036962215     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2002.9265944     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. 1996. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120: 189-208.
2. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: 27-55. New York: Plenum.
3. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (Office of the Secretary, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
4. Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. 2000. Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research, Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1248-1264.
5. Schminke, M. 2002. From the editors: Tensions. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 487-490.
6. Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. 1996. Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17: 639-655.
7. Spector, P. 1998. When reviewers become authors: A comment on the journal review process. Research Methods Forum, 3: http://www.aom.pace.edu/rmd/1998_forum_reviewers_become_authors.html.
8. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. 1990. Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings: 77-98. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.