What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 65-78

  Trafimow, David ^a   Rice, Stephen ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049244387     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01107.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ajzen I.,Fishbein M.Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
2. Bakan D.The test of significance in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin. 1966;66:423-437.
3. Carver R.P.The case against statistical significance testing, revisited.Journal of Experimental Education. 1993;61:287-292.
4. Cohen J.The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist. 1994;49:997-1003.
5. Einstein A.Relativity: The special and the general theory. New York: Crown Publishers; 1961.
6. Fishbein M.,Ajzen I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
7. Freud S.,Breuer J.Studies on hysteria (Studien über Hysterie). New York: Penguin Group; 1895.
8. Hawking S.The universe in a nutshell. New York: Bantam Books; 2001.
9. Kidd R.F.Manipulation checks: Advantage or disadvantage.Representative Research in Social Psychology. 1976;7:160-165.
10. Lakatos I.The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers, Volume 1. Cambridge, United Kingdom, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1978.
11. Perdue B.C.,Summers J.O.Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments.Journal of Marketing Research. 1986;23:317-326.
12. Popper K.Logik der Forschung. New York: Basic Books; 1959.
13. Rozeboom W.W.The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test.Psychological Bulletin. 1960;57:416-428.
14. Sawilowsky S.Deconstructing arguments from the case against hypothesis testing.Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2003;2:467-474.
15. Sawyer A.G.,Lynch J.G.,Brinberg D.L.A Bayesian analysis of the information value of manipulation and confounding checks in theory tests.Journal of Consumer Research. 1995;21:581-595.
16. Schmidt F.L.Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers.Psychological Methods. 1996;1:115-129.
17. Schmidt F.L.,Hunter J.E.What if there were no significance tests?. Harlow L.Mulaik S.A.Steiger J.H., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997:37-64.
18. Trafimow D.Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes's theorem.Psychological Review. 2003;110:526-535.
19. Trafimow D.The ubiquitous Laplacian assumption: Reply to Lee and Wagenmakers.Psychological Review. 2005;112:669-674.
20. Trafimow D.Multiplicative invalidity and its application to complex correlational models.Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs. 2006a;132:215-239.
21. Trafimow D.Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: An imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses.Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs. 2006b;132:431-462.
22. TrafimowD.(in press).The theory of reasoned action: A case study of falsification in psychology.Theory & Psychology.
23. Trafimow D.,Brown J.,Grace K.,Thompson L.,Sheeran P.The relative influence of attitudes and subjective norms from childhood to adolescence: Between-participants and within-participants analyses.American Journal of Psychology. 2002;115:395-414.
24. Trafimow D.,Sheeran P.Some tests of the distinction between cognitive and affective beliefs.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1998;34:378-397.
25. Wolfson R.Simply Einstein: Relativity demystified. New York: W.W. Norton; 2003.