Reviewing journal rankings and revisiting peer reviews: Editorial perspectives

Journal of Management Studies

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 612-621

  Clark, Timothy ^a   Wright, Mike ^b  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247646965     PISSN: 00222380     EISSN: 14676486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00701.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barley, S. R. (2006 When I write my masterpiece: thoughts on what makes a paper interesting Academy of Management Journal, 49, 16 20.
2. Baruch, Y., Konrad, A., Aguinis, H. Starbuck, W. H. (forthcoming). Opening the Black Box of Editorship. Basingstoke : Palgrave-Macmillan.
3. Bedeian, A. G. (2004 Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 198 216.
4. Campanario, J. M. (1995 On influential books and journal articles initially rejected because of negative referees' evaluations Science Communication, 16, 304 25.
5. Campanario, J. M. (1998 Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1 Science Communication, 19, 181 211.
6. Cicchetti, D. V. (1980 Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist American Psychologist, 35, 300 3.
7. Cicchetti, D. V. (1991 The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: a cross-disciplinary investigation Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119 86.
8. Clark, T., Floyd, S. Wright, M. (2006 On the review process and journal development Journal of Management Studies, 43, 655 64.
9. Easton, G. (2007 Liberating the markets for journal publications; some specific options Journal of Management Studies, 44, 628 39.
10. Goodstein, L. D. (1982 When will the editors start to edit In Harnad, S. (Ed Peer Commentary on Peer Review: A Case Study in Scientific Control. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 28 9.
11. Gottfredson, S. D. (1978 Evaluating psychological research reports: dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgements American Psychologist, 33, 920 34.
12. Hendrick, C. (1977 Editorial comment Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 1 2.
13. Hillman, A. Rynes, S. L. (2007 The future of double-blind review in management Journal of Management Studies, 44, 622 7.
14. Jensen, M. (2006 Researching and Publishing in Finance Seminar presented at Nottingham University Business School, 13 November.
15. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
16. Macdonald, S. Kam, J. (2007 Ring a ring o' roses: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies Journal of Management Studies, 44, 640 55.
17. Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science. Chicago : Chicago University Press.
18. Miller, C. C. (2006 Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: prevalence and effects of reviewer hostility, bias and dissensus Academy of Management Journal, 49, 425 31.
19. Peters, D. P. Ceci, S. J. (1982 Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 5, 187 255.
20. Rothaermel, F., Agung, S. Jiang, L. (2007 University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature Industrial and Corporate Change, 16.
21. Scar, S. Weber, B. L. R. (1978 The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist American Psychologist, 33, 935.
22. Scott, W. A. (1974 Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology American Psychologist, 29, 698 792.
23. Starbuck, W. H. (2003 Turning lemons into lemonade: where is the value in peer reviews? Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 344 51.
24. Starbuck, W. H. (2005 How much better are the most prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication Organization Science, 16, 180 200.
25. Sutton, R. Staw, B. (1995 What theory is not Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371 84.
26. Weick, K. (1995 What theory is not, theorizing is Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385 90.