Shaping the field: The role of academic journal editors in the construction of education as a field of study

British Journal of Sociology of Education

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 643-655

  Wellington, Jerry ^a   Nixon, Jon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844605905     PISSN: 01425692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01425690500293835     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Agger, B. (1991) A critical theory of public life (London, Falmer Press).
2. Apple, M. (1999) What counts as legitimate knowledge? The social production and use of reviews, Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 343-346.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1988) Homo academicus (Trans. P. Collier) (Cambridge, Polity Press).
4. Bourdieu, P. (1996) The rules of art: genesis and the structure of the literary field (Trans. S. Emanuel) (Cambridge, Polity Press).
5. Bourdieu, P. (1999) The weight of the world: social suffering in contemporary society (Cambridge, Polity Press).
6. Bourdieu, P. (2000) Pascalian meditations (Trans. R. Nice) (Cambridge, Polity Press).
7. Eisenhart, M. (2002) The paradox of peer review: admitting too much or allowing too little?, Research in Science Education, 32(2), 241-256.
8. Fiske, D. & Fogg, L. (1990) 'But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper!', American Psychologist, 45, 591-598.
9. Glass, G. (1999) A new day in how scholars communicate, Current Issues in Education, 2(2), 1-4.
10. Nixon, J. (1999) Teachers, writers and professionals. Is there anybody out there?, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 207-221.
11. Nixon, J. & Ranson, S. (1997) Theorising 'agreement': the bases of a new professional ethic, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(2), 197-214.
12. Nixon, J., Walker, M. & Clough, P. (2003) Research as thoughtful practice, in P. Sikes, J. Nixon & W. Carr <(Eds) The moral foundations of educational research: knowledge, inquiry and values (Maidenhead & Philadelphia, Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education).
13. Nixon, J. & Wellington, J. (2005) 'Good books': is there a future for academic writing within the educational publishing industry?, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(1), 91-103.
14. Noble, K. (1989) Publish or perish: what 23 journal editors have to say, Studies in Higher Education, 14(1), 97-102.
15. Packwood, A., Scanlon, M. & Weiner, G. (1997) Getting published: a study of writing, refereeing and editing practices (Swindon, Economic and Social Science Research Council).
16. Peters, D. & Ceci, S. (1982). Peer review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again, The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-255.
17. Skinner, Q. (2002) Visions of politics. Volume 1: regarding method (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
18. Smith, B. & Gough, P. (1984). Editors speak out on refereeing, Phi Delta Kappan, May, 637-639.
19. Tight, M. (2003) Researching higher education (Maidenhead, Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education).
20. Weiner, G. (2001) The Academic journal: has it a future?, Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA, available online), 9(9), 1-18.
21. Wellington, J. (2003) Getting published (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
22. Wellington, J. & Torgerson, C. (2005) Writing for publication: what counts as a 'high status, eminent, academic journal'?, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(1), 35-48.