Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 422-432

  Schweitzer, Maurice E ^a,d   Ordóñez, Lisa ^b   Douma, Bambi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142774452     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/20159591     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. 1999. Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25: 231-292.
2. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. 1999. Sex differences in business ethics: The importance of perceptions. Journal of Management Issues, 11: 454-474.
3. Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 248-287.
4. Bohte, J., & Meier, K. J. 2000. Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating. Public Administration Review, 60(2): 173.
5. Bok, S. 1978. Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books.
6. Campion, M. A., & Lord, R. G. 1982. A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 30: 265-287.
7. Covey, M., Saladin, S., & Killen, P. 1989. Self-monitoring, surveillance, and incentive effects on cheating. Journal of Social Psychology, 129: 673-679.
8. Degeorge, F., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business, 72: 1-33.
9. Delaney, J. T., & Sockell, D. 1992. Do company ethics training programs make a difference? An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 11: 719-727.
10. Barley, P. C., Connolly, T., & Ekegren, G. 1989. Goals, strategy development, and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 24-33.
11. Flannery, B., & May, D. 2000. Environmental ethical decision making in the U.S. metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 642-662.
12. Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. 1994. Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13: 205-221.
13. Gellatly, I., & Meyer, J. 1992. The effects of goal difficulty on physiological arousal, cognition, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 694-704.
14. Gollwitzer, P., & Schaal, B. 2001. How goals and plans affect action. In J. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement: 139-161. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Grover, S. L. 1993. Lying, deceit, and subterfuge: A model of dishonesty in the workplace. Organizational Science, 4: 478-495.
16. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. 1999. Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38: 79-109.
17. Hegarty, W., & Sims, H. P. 1978. Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 451-457.
18. Hollenbeck, J. R., & Klein, H. J. 1987. Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 212-220.
19. Hollenbeck, J. R., Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. 1989. An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 18-23.
20. Huber, V., & Neale, M. 1987. Effects of self- and competitor goals on performance in an interdependent bargaining task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 197-203.
21. Jensen, M. C. 2001. Corporate budgeting is broken - Let's fix it. Harvard Business Review, 79(6): 94-101.
22. Johnson, J. T. 1986. The knowledge of what might have been: Affective and attributional consequences of near outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12: 51-62.
23. Jones, T. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16: 366-395.
24. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1982. The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: 201-208. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. 1990. Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1101- 1110.
26. Latham, G. P., & Seijts, G. H. 1999. The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 421-429.
27. Lewicki, R. J. 1983. Lying and deception: A behavioral model. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations: 68-90. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Lewicki, R. J., & Robinson, R. 1998. Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17: 665-682.
29. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. 2000. A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25: 204.
31. Northcraft, G., Neale, M., & Earley, P. 1994. Joint effects of assigned goals and training on negotiator performance. Human Performance, 7: 257-272.
32. Renn, R. W., Danehower, C., Swiercz, P. M., & Icenogle, M. L. 1999. Further examination of the measurement properties of Leifer & McGannon's (1986) Goal Acceptance and Goal Commitment Scales. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 107-113.
33. Robinson, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Donahue, E. 2000. Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21: 649-664.
34. Santoro, M., & Paine, L. 1993. Sears auto centers (Harvard Business School case 9-394-010). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
35. Schminke, M., & Ambrose, M. 1997. Asymmetric perceptions of ethical frameworks of men and women in business and nonbusiness settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 719-730.
36. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M., & Noel, T. 1997. The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1190-1207.
37. Schweitzer, M., & Croson, R. 1999. Curtailing deception: The impact of direct questions on lies and omissions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10: 225-248.
38. Schweitzer, M., & Hsee, C. 2002. Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. Journal of Bisk and Uncertainty, 25: 185-201.
39. Shapira, Z. 1989. Task choice and assigned goals as determinants of task motivation and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44: 141-165.
40. Staw, B., & Boettger, R. 1990. Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 534-559.
41. Tenbrunsel, A. 1998. Misrepresentation and expectation of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 330-339.
42. Tenbrunsel, A., Wade-Benzoni, K., Messick, D., & Bazerman, M. 2000. Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 854-866.
43. Treviño, L. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11: 601-617.
44. Treviño, L., & Youngblood, S. 1990. Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 378-385.
45. Vance, R. J., & Colella, A. 1990. Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 68-76.
46. Weaver, G., Treviño, L., & Cochran, P. 1999. Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990's: An empirical study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics, 18: 283-294.
47. Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. 1987. Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 416-425.