Encoding-Stage Crosstalk between Object- and Spatial Property-Based Scene Processing Pathways

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 2267-2281

  Linsley, Drew ^a   MacEvoy, Sean P ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

fMRI; multivoxel pattern analyses; parahippocampal place area; scene perception; spatial layout

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BATH; BRAIN FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HOME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KITCHEN; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NOVEL OBJECT RECOGNITION TEST; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938563571     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu034     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aguirre GK, Mattar MG, Magis-Weinberg L. 2011. de Bruijn cycles for neural decoding. NeuroImage. 56:1293-1300.
2. Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M. 1998. An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to "building" stimuli: evidence and implications. Neuron. 21:373-383.
3. Aminoff E, Gronau N, Bar M. 2007. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb Cortex. 17:1493-1503.
4. Aminoff EM, Kveraga K, Bar M. 2013. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 17:379-390.
5. Anstis S, Verstraten FA, Mather G. 1998. The motion aftereffect. Trends Cogn Sci. 2:111-117.
6. Antes JR, Penland JG, Metzger RL. 1981. Processing global information in briefly presented pictures. Psychol Res. 43:277-292.
7. Baldassano C, Beck DM, Fei-Fei L. 2013. Differential connectivity within the parahippocampal place area. NeuroImage. 75:228-237.
8. Bar M. 2004. Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci. 5:617-629.
9. Bar M, Aminoff E. 2003. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron. 38:347-358.
10. Bar M, Ullman S. 1996. Spatial context in recognition. Perception. 25:343-352.
11. Biederman I. 1972. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science. 177:77-80.
12. Biederman I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev. 94:115-147.
13. Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC. 1982. Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognit Psychol. 14:143-177.
14. Boyce SJ, Pollatsek A. 1992. Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 18:531-543.
15. Brainard DH. 1997. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 10:433-436.
16. Cant JS, Goodale MA. 2007. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 17:713-731.
17. Cant JS, Xu Y. 2012. Object ensemble processing in human anteriormedial ventral visual cortex. J Neurosci. 32:7685-7700.
18. Chadwick MJ, Mullally SL, Maguire EA. 2013. The hippocampus extrapolates beyond the view in scenes: an fMRI study of boundary extension. Cortex. 49:2067-2079.
19. Davenport JL, Potter MC. 2004. Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychol Sci. 15:559-564.
20. De Graef P, Christiaens D, d'Ydewalle G. 1990. Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychol Res. 52:317-329.
21. Drucker DM, Aguirre GK. 2009. Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. Cereb Cortex. 19:2269-2280.
22. Epstein R, Higgins J. 2006. Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cereb Cortex. 17:1680-1693.
23. Epstein RA, Graham KS, Downing PE. 2003. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron. 37:865-876.
24. Epstein RA, Kanwisher N. 1998. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 392:598-601.
25. Epstein RA, Ward EJ. 2010. How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area? Cereb Cortex. 20:294-303.
26. Fei-Fei L, Iyer A, Koch C, Perona P. 2007. What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? J Vis. 7:10,1-29.
27. Friedman A. 1979. Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. J Exp Psychol. 108:316-355.
28. Greene MR, Oliva A. 2010. High-level aftereffects to global scene properties. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 36:1430-1442.
29. Greene MR, Oliva A. 2009. Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognit Psychol. 58:137-176.
30. Harel A, Kravitz DJ, Baker CI. 2012. Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information. Cereb Cortex. 23:947-957.
31. Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Maguire EA. 2007. Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory. J Neurosci. 27:14365-14374.
32. Hollingworth A, Henderson JM. 1998. Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? J Exp Psychol Gen. 127:398-415.
33. Honey C, Kirchner H, VanRullen R. 2008. Faces in the cloud: Fourier power spectrum biases ultrarapid face detection. J Vis. 8:1-13.
34. Howard LR, Kumaran D, Ólafsdóttir HF, Spiers HJ. 2011. Double dissociation between hippocampal and parahippocampal responses to object-background context and scene novelty. J Neurosci. 31:5253-5261.
35. Joubert OR, Rousselet GA, Fize D, Fabre-Thorpe M. 2007. Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference. Vision Res. 47:3286-3297.
36. Julian JB, Fedorenko E, Webster J, Kanwisher N. 2012. An algorithmic method for functionally defining regions of interest in the ventral visual pathway. NeuroImage. 60:2357-2364.
37. Kirchhoff BA, Wagner AD, Maril A, Stern CE. 2000. Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory. J Neurosci. 20:6173-6180.
38. Koutstaal W, Wagner AD, Rotte M, Maril A, Buckner RL, Schacter DL. 2001. Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia. 39:184-199.
39. Kravitz DJ, Peng CS, Baker CI. 2011. Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places. J Neurosci. 31:7322-7333.
40. Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R, Bandettini P. 2006. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:3863-3868.
41. Leopold DA, O'Toole AJ, Vetter T, Blanz V. 2001. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat Neurosci. 4:89-94.
42. Little AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC. 2005. Sex-contingent face aftereffects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 272:2283-2287.
43. Loftus GR, Nelson WW, Kallman HJ. 1983. Differential acquisition rates for different types of information from pictures. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A. 35:187-198.
44. MacEvoy SP, Epstein RA. 2011. Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 14:1323-1329.
45. MacEvoy SP, Epstein RA. 2009. Decoding the representation of multiple simultaneous objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Curr Biol. 19:943-947.
46. MacEvoy SP, Yang Z. 2012. Joint neuronal tuning for object form and position in the human lateral occipital complex. NeuroImage. 63:1901-1908.
47. McCotter M, Gosselin F, Sowden P, Schyns P. 2005. The use of visual information in natural scenes. Vis Cogn. 12:938-953.
48. Morgan LK, MacEvoy SP, Aguirre GK, Epstein RA. 2011. Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. J Neurosci. 31:1238-1245.
49. Mudrik L, Lamy D, Deouell LY. 2010. ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia. 48:507-517.
50. Mullally SL, Maguire EA. 2013. Exploring the role of space-defining objects in constructing and maintaining imagined scenes. Brain Cogn. 82:100-107.
51. Mullally SL, Maguire EA. 2011. A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space. J Neurosci. 31:7441-7449.
52. Nasr S, Devaney KJ, Tootell RBH. 2013. Spatial encoding and underlying circuitry in scene-selective cortex. NeuroImage. 83: 892-900.
53. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. 2002. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 15:1-25.
54. Oliva A, Schyns PG. 2000. Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognit Psychol. 41:176-210.
55. Oliva A, Torralba A. 2006. Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. Prog Brain Res. 155:23-36.
56. Oliva A, Torralba A. 2001. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int J Comput Vis. 42:145-175.
57. Palmer SE. 1975. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Mem Cognit. 3:519-526.
58. Park S, Brady TF, Greene MR, Oliva A. 2011. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. J Neurosci. 31:1333-1340.
59. Park S, Intraub H, Yi D-J, Widders D, Chun MM. 2007. Beyond the edges of a view: boundary extension in human scene-selective visual cortex. Neuron. 54:335-342.
60. Peelen MV, Fei-Fei L, Kastner S. 2009. Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex. Nature. 460:94-97.
61. Rajimehr R, Devaney KJ, Bilenko NY, Young JC, Tootell RBH. 2011. The "parahippocampal place area" responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys. PLoS Biol. 9: e1000608.
62. Renninger LW, Malik J. 2004. When is scene identification just texture recognition? Vision Res. 44:2301-2311.
63. Rhodes G, Jeffery L, Clifford CWG, Leopold DA. 2007. The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects. Vision Res. 47:2291-2296.
64. Russell B, Torralba A, Murphy K, Freeman W. 2008. LabelMe: a database and web-based tool for image annotation. Int J Comput Vis. 77:157-173.
65. Schyns PG, Oliva A. 1994. From blobs to boundary edges: evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychol Sci. 5:195-200.
66. StevensWD, Kahn I,Wig GS, Schacter DL. 2012. Hemispheric asymmetry of visual scene processing in the human brain: evidence from repetition priming and intrinsic activity. Cereb Cortex. 22:1935-1949.
67. Summerfield JJ, Hassabis D, Maguire EA. 2010. Differential engagement of brain regions within a "core" network during scene construction. Neuropsychologia. 48:1501-1509.
68. Troiani V, Stigliani A, Smith ME, Epstein RA. 2014. Multiple object properties drive scene-selective regions. Cereb Cortex. 24:883-897.
69. Vogel J, Schiele B. 2007. Semantic modeling of natural scenes for content-based image retrieval. Int J Comput Vis. 72:133-157.
70. Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Rotte M, Koutstaal W, Maril A, Dale AM, Rosen BR, Buckner RL. 1998. Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science. 281:1188-1191.
71. Walther DB, Caddigan E, Fei-Fei L, Beck DM. 2009. Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain. J Neurosci. 29:10573-10581.
72. Webster M, Maclin O. 1999. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychon Bull Rev. 6:647-653.
73. Webster MA, Kaping D, Mizokami Y, Duhamel P. 2004. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature. 428:557-561.
74. Xu Y, Turk-Browne NB, Chun MM. 2007. Dissociating task performance from fMRI repetition attenuation in ventral visual cortex. J Neurosci. 27:5981-5985.
75. Zeidman P, Mullally SL, Schwarzkopf DS, Maguire EA. 2012. Exploring the parahippocampal cortex response to high and low spatial frequency spaces. Neuroreport. 23:503-507.
76. Zimmer M, Kovács G. 2011. Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 366:586-595.