Joint neuronal tuning for object form and position in the human lateral occipital complex

NeuroImage

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1901-1908

  MacEvoy, Sean P ^a   Yang, Zoe ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

FMRI; Lateral occipital complex; Object recognition; Position

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LATERAL OCCIPITAL COMPLEX; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; NERVE CELL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURONS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867079413     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.043     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Afraz S.R., Cavanagh P. Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vision Res. 2008, 48:42-54.
2. Aggelopoulos N.C., Rolls E.T. Scene perception: inferior temporal cortex neurons encode the positions of different objects in the scene. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 22:2903-2916.
3. Aguirre G.K., Mattar M.G., Magis-Weinberg L. De bruijn cycles for neural decoding. NeuroImage 2011, 56:1293-1300.
4. Biederman I., Cooper E.E. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 1991, 20:585-593.
5. Carlson T.A., Schrater P., He S. Patterns of activity in the categorical representations of objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15:704-717.
6. Carlson T., Hogendoorn H., Fonteijn H., Verstraten F.A. Spatial coding and invariance in object-selective cortex. Cortex 2011, 47:14-22.
7. Cichy R.M., Chen Y., Haynes J.D. Encoding the identity and location of objects in human loc. NeuroImage 2011, 54:2297-2307.
8. Cichy R.M., Sterzer P., Heinzle J., Elliott L.T., Ramirez F., Haynes J.D. Probing principles of large-scale object representation: category preference and location encoding. Hum. Brain Mapp 2012, 10.1002/hbm.22020.
9. DiCarlo J.J., Maunsell J.H. Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 89:3264-3278.
10. Drucker D.M., Aguirre G.K. Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral loc. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2269-2280.
11. Epstein R.A., Higgins J.S. Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 17:1680-1693.
12. Fischer J., Spotswood N., Whitney D. The emergence of perceived position in the visual system. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:119-136.
13. Fiser J., Biederman I. Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere. Vision Res. 2001, 41:221-234.
14. Golomb J.D., Kanwisher N. Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 10.1093/cercor/bhr357.
15. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
16. Hayworth K.J., Lescroart M.D., Biederman I. Neural encoding of relative position. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2011, 37:1032-1050.
17. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. The representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 2001, 293:1506-1509.
18. Kravitz D.J., Vinson L.D., Baker C.I. How position dependent is visual object recognition?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:114-122.
19. Kravitz D.J., Kriegeskorte N., Baker C.I. High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2916-2925.
20. Kravitz D.J., Peng C.S., Baker C.I. Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:7322-7333.
21. MacEvoy S.P., Epstein R.A. Position selectivity in scene- and object-responsive occipitotemporal regions. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:2089-2098.
22. MacEvoy S.P., Epstein R.A. Decoding the representation of multiple simultaneous objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:943-947.
23. MacEvoy S.P., Epstein R.A. Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:1323-1329.
24. McKyton A., Zohary E. Beyond retinotopic mapping: the spatial representation of objects in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 17:1164-1172.
25. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., Macko K.A. Object vision and spatial vision - 2 cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci. 1983, 6:414-417.
26. Morgan L.K., MacEvoy S.P., Aguirre G.K., Epstein R.A. Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:1238-1245.
27. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 15:1-25.
28. Niemeier M., Goltz H.C., Kuchinad A., Tweed D.B., Vilis T. A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:325-331.
29. Op De Beeck H., Vogels R. Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000, 426:505-518.
30. Peelen M.V., Fei-Fei L., Kastner S. Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex. Nature 2009, 460:94-97.
31. Sayres R., Grill-Spector K. Relating retinotopic and object-selective responses in human lateral occipital cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100:249-267.
32. Schwarzlose R.F., Swisher J.D., Dang S., Kanwisher N. The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:4447-4452.