Exploring the role of space-defining objects in constructing and maintaining imagined scenes

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 100-107

  Mullally, Sinéad L ^a   Maguire, Eleanor A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Memory; Objects; Parahippocampal cortex; Scene construction; Scenes; Space defining

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; GUIDED IMAGERY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGINATION; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL TASK; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPACE AMBIGUOUS OBJECT; SPACE DEFINING OBJECT; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MEMORY; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84875847954     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aguirre G.K., Detre J.A., Alsop D.C., D'Esposito M. The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cerebral Cortex 1996, 6:823-829.
2. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:617-629.
3. Bar M., Aminoff E., Schacter D.L. Scenes unseen: The parahippocampal cortex intrinsically subserves contextual associations, not scenes or places per se. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:8539-8544.
4. Biederman I. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 1972, 177:77-80.
5. Biederman I., Mezzanotte R.J., Rabinowitz J.C. Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:143-177.
6. Bird C.M., Capponi C., King J.A., Doeller C.F., Burgess N. Establishing the boundaries: The hippocampal contribution to imagining scenes. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:11688-11695.
7. Bisiach E., Luzzatti C. Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 1978, 14:129-133.
8. Buckner R.L., Carroll D.C. Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:49-57.
9. Burgess N., Jackson A., Hartley T., O'Keefe J. Predictions derived from modelling the hippocampal role in navigation. Biological Cybernetics 2000, 83:301-312.
10. Doeller C.F., Kaplan R. Parahippocampal cortex: Translating vision into space. Current Biology 2011, 21:R589-591.
11. Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science 1990, 247:721-723.
12. Epstein R.A. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:388-396.
13. Epstein R., Harris A., Stanley D., Kanwisher N. The parahippocampal place area: Recognition, navigation, or encoding?. Neuron 1999, 23:115-125.
14. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
15. Hartley T., Burgess N., Lever C., Cacucci F., O'Keefe J. Modeling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus. Hippocampus 2000, 10:369-379.
16. Hassabis D., Kumaran D., Maguire E.A. Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:14365-14374.
17. Hassabis D., Maguire E.A. Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:299-306.
18. Hassabis D., Maguire E.A. The construction system of the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences 2009, 364:1263-1271.
19. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50:243-271.
20. Howard L.R., Kumaran D., Olafsdottir H.F., Spiers H.J. Double dissociation between hippocampal and parahippocampal responses to object-background context and scene novelty. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:5253-5261.
21. Intraub H., Richardson M. Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1989, 15:179-187.
22. Janzen G., van Turennout M. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:673-677.
23. Konkle T., Oliva A. A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron 2012, 74:1114-1124.
24. Kravitz D.J., Peng C.S., Baker C.I. Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: It's the spaces more than the places. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:7322-7333.
25. Lever C., Burton S., Jeewajee A., O'Keefe J., Burgess N. Boundary vector cells in the subiculum of the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:9771-9777.
26. Mandler J.M., Parker R.E. Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning 1976, 2:38-48.
27. Mullally S.L., Maguire E.A. A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:7441-7449.
28. Naselaris T., Prenger R.J., Kay K.N., Oliver M., Gallant J.L. Bayesian reconstruction of natural images from human brain activity. Neuron 2009, 63:902-915.
29. O'Craven K.M., Kanwisher N. Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:1013-1023.
30. O'Keefe J., Burgess N. Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature 1996, 381:425-428.
31. Oliva A., Schyns P.G. Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diasnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 34:72-107.
32. Park S., Brady T.F., Greene M.R., Oliva A. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: Complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:1333-1340.
33. Potter M.C., Faulconer B.A. Time to understand pictures and words. Nature 1975, 253:437-438.
34. Ranganath C., Ritchey M. Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2012, 13:713-726.
35. Schacter D.L., Addis D.R., Buckner R.L. Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2008, 1124:39-60.
36. Solstad T., Boccara C.N., Kropff E., Moser M.B., Moser E.I. Representation of geometric borders in the entorhinal cortex. Science 2008, 322:1865-1868.
37. Spreng R.N., Mar R.A., Kim A.S. The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: A quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:489-510.
38. Summerfield J.J., Hassabis D., Maguire E.A. Differential engagement of brain regions within a 'core' network during scene construction. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1501-1509.
39. Walther D.B., Caddigan E., Fei-Fei L., Beck D.M. Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:10573-10581.
40. Walther D.B., Chai B., Caddigan E., Beck D.M., Fei-Fei L. Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States 2011, 108:9661-9666.
41. Zeidman P., Mullally S.L., Schwarzkopf D.S., Maguire E.A. Exploring the parahippocampal cortex response to high and low spatial frequency spaces. Neuroreport 2012, 23:503-507.