Differential connectivity within the Parahippocampal Place Area

NeuroImage

Volumn 75, Issue , 2013, Pages 228-237

  Baldassano, Christopher ^a   Beck, Diane M ^b   Fei Fei, Li ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

FMRI; Functional connectivity; Parahippocampal Place Area; PPA

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84887624583     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.073     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., Desposito M. An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to building stimuli: evidence and implications. Neuron 1998, 21:373-383.
2. Aminoff E., Gronau N., Bar M. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:1493-1503.
3. Arcaro M., McMains S., Singer B., Kastner S. Retinotopic organization of human ventral visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10638-10652.
4. Baldassano C., Iordan M.C., Beck D.M., Fei-Fei L. Voxel-level functional connectivity using spatial regularization. Neuroimage 2012, 63:1099-1106.
5. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5:617-629.
6. Bar M., Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003, 38:347-358.
7. Buckner R.L., Andrews-Hanna J.R., Schacter D.L. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1124:1-38.
8. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:713-731.
9. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Scratching beneath the surface: new insights into the functional properties of the lateral occipital area and parahippocampal place area. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:8248-8258.
10. Cant J.S., Xu Y. Object ensemble processing in human anterior-medial ventral visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:7685-7700.
11. Caspers S., Geyer S., Schleicher A., Mohlberg H., Amunts K., Zilles K. The human inferior parietal cortex: cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. Neuroimage 2006, 33:430-448.
12. Caspers S., Eickhoff S.B., Geyer S., Scheperjans F., Mohlberg H., Zilles K., Amunts K. The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space. Brain Struct. Funct. 2008, 212:481-495.
13. Caspers S., Eickhoff S.B., Rick T., Von Kapri A., Kuhlen T., Huang R., Shah N.J., Zilles K. Probabilistic fibre tract analysis of cytoarchitectonically defined human inferior parietal lobule areas reveals similarities to macaques. Neuroimage 2011, 58:362-380.
14. Caspers S., Schleicher A., Bacha-Trams M., Palomero-Gallagher N., Amunts K., Zilles K. Organization of the human inferior parietal lobule based on receptor architectonics. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 1-14.
15. Cavada C., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: I. Parcellation of areas based on distinctive limbic and sensory corticocortical connections. J. Comp. Neurol. 1989, 287:393-421.
16. Chai B., Walther D., Beck D., Fei-Fei L. Exploring functional connectivity of the human brain using multivariate information analysis. NIPS 22 2009.
17. Cohen A.L., Fair D.A., Dosenbach N.U., Miezin F.M., Dierker D., Van Essen D.C., Schlaggar B.L., Petersen S.E. Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 2008, 41:45-57.
18. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29:162-173.
19. Dilks D.D., Julian J.B., Paunov A.M., Kanwisher N. The occipital place area is causally and selectively involved in scene perception. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:1331-1336.
20. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:123-152.
21. Eickhoff S.B., Stephan K.E., Mohlberg H., Grefkes C., Fink G.R., Amunts K., Zilles K. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2005, 25:1325-1335.
22. Epstein R. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:388-396.
23. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
24. Epstein R.A., Morgan L.K. Neural responses to visual scenes reveals inconsistencies between fMRI adaptation and multivoxel pattern analysis. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:530-543.
25. Epstein R., Harris A., Stanley D., Kanwisher N. The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding?. Neuron 1999, 23:115-125.
26. Epstein R., Graham K.S., Downing P.E. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron 2003, 37:865-876.
27. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D.C., Raichle M.E. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:9673-9678.
28. Golarai G., Ghahremani D.G., Whitfield-Gabrieli S., Reiss A., Eberhardt J.L., Gabrieli J.D., Grill-Spector K. Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:512-522.
29. Grant M., Boyd S. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 1.21 http://cvxr.com/cvx.
30. Greicius M.D., Supekar K., Menon V., Dougherty R.F. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:72-78.
31. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
32. Harel A., Kravitz D.J., Baker C.I. Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 23:947-957.
33. Heinzle J., Kahnt T., Haynes J. Topographically specific functional connectivity between visual field maps in the human brain. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1426-1436.
34. Janzen G., Van Turennout M. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:673-677.
35. Kahn I., Andrews-Hanna J.R., Vincent J.L., Snyder A.Z., Buckner R.L. Distinct cortical anatomy linked to subregions of the medial temporal lobe revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100:129-139.
36. Kim D.S., Kim M. Combining functional and diffusion tensor MRI. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1064:1-15.
37. Kim J.H., Lee J.M., Jo H.J., Kim S.H., Lee J.H., Kim S.T., Seo S.W., Cox R.W., Na D.L., Kim S.I., Saad Z.S. Defining functional SMA and pre-SMA subregions in human MFC using resting state fMRI: functional connectivity-based parcellation method. Neuroimage 2010, 49:2375-2386.
38. Konkle, T., 2011. The role of real-world size in object representation. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA.
39. Konkle T., Oliva A. A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron 2012, 74:1114-1124.
40. Kravitz D.J., Peng C.S., Baker C.I. Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:7322-7333.
41. Kravitz D.J., Saleem K.S., Baker C.I., Mishkin M. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 12:217-230.
42. Libby L.A., Ekstrom A.D., Ragland J.D., Ranganath C. Differential connectivity of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices within human hippocampal subregions revealed by high-resolution functional imaging. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:6550-6560.
43. Litman L., Awipi T., Davachi L. Category-specificity in the human medial temporal lobe cortex. Hippocampus 2009, 19:308-319.
44. MacEvoy S.P., Epstein R.A. Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:1323-1329.
45. Margulies D.S., Kelly A.M., Uddin L.Q., Biswal B.B., Castellanos F.X., Milham M.P. Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage 2007, 37:579-588.
46. Margulies D.S., Vincent J.L., Kelly C., Lohmann G., Uddin L.Q., Biswal B.B., Villringer A., Castellanos F.X., Milham M.P., Petrides M. Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys. PNAS 2009, 106:20069-20074.
47. Mullally S.L., Maguire E.A. A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:7441-7449.
48. Nasr S., Liu N., Devaney K.J., Yue X., Rajimehr R., Ungerleider L.G., Tootell R.B. Scene-selective cortical regions in human and nonhuman primates. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:13771-13785.
49. Park S., Brady T.F., Greene M.R., Oliva A. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:1333-1340.
50. Raichle M.E., MacLeod A.M., Snyder A.Z., Powers W.J., Gusnard D.A., Shulman G.L. A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:676-682.
51. Rajimehr R., Devaney K.J., Bilenko N.Y., Young J.C., Tootell R.B. The "parahippocampal place area" responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000608.
52. Roy A.K., Shehzad Z., Margulies D.S., Kelly A.M., Uddin L.Q., Gotimer K., Biswal B.B., Castellanos F.X., Milham M.P. Functional connectivity of the human amygdala using resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 2009, 45:614-626.
53. Rushworth M.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:1418-1430.
54. Saleem K.S., Price J.L., Hashikawa T. Cytoarchitectonic and chemoarchitectonic subdivisions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 2007, 500:973-1006.
55. Sewards T.V. Neural structures and mechanisms involved in scene recognition: a review and interpretation. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:277-298.
56. Staresina B.P., Duncan K.D., Davachi L. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices differentially contribute to later recollection of object- and scene-related event details. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:8739-8747.
57. Suzuki W.A. Comparative analysis of the cortical afferents, intrinsic projections and interconnections of the parahippocampal region in monkeys and rats. The Cognitive Neurosciences 2009, 659-674. The MIT Press. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
58. Uddin L.Q., Supekar K., Amin H., Rykhlevskaia E., Nguyen D.A., Greicius M.D., Menon V. Dissociable connectivity within human angular gyrus and intraparietal sulcus: evidence from functional and structural connectivity. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2636-2646.
59. Walther D.B., Chai B., Caddigan E., Beck D.M., Fei-Fei L. Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108:9661-9666.
60. Weiner K.S., Grill-Spector K. Not one extrastriate body area: using anatomical landmarks, hMT+, and visual field maps to parcellate limb-selective activations in human lateral occipitotemporal cortex. Neuroimage 2011, 56:2183-2199.
61. Zhang D., Snyder A.Z., Fox M.D., Sansbury M.W., Shimony J.S., Raichle M.E. Intrinsic functional relations between human cerebral cortex and thalamus. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100:1740-1748.