Multiple object properties drive scene-selective regions

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 883-897

  Troiani, Vanessa ^a   Stigliani, Anthony ^a   Smith, Mary E ^a   Epstein, Russell A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

fMRI; parahippocampal place area; scene perception; spatial layout; visual context

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

FMRI; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; SCENE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL LAYOUT; VISUAL CONTEXT;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIZE PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896351201     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs364     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M. 1998. The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage. 8:360-369
2. Aminoff E, Gronau N, Bar M. 2007. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb Cortex. 17:1493-1503.
3. Amit E, Trope Y, Mehudar E, Yovel G. 2012. Activation of ventral visual cortex supports distance representation. Brain Cogn. 80:201-213.
4. Arcaro MJ, McMains SA, Singer BD, Kastner S. 2009. Retinotopic organization of human ventral visual cortex. J Neurosci. 29: 10638-10652.
5. Auger SD, Mullally SL, Maguire EA. 2012. Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks. PLoS One. 7:e43620.
6. Bar M. 2004. Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci. 5:617-629.
7. Bar M, Aminoff E. 2003. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron. 38:347-358.
8. Bar M, Aminoff E, Schacter DL. 2008. Scenes unseen: the parahippocampal cortex intrinsically subserves contextual associations, not scenes or places per se. J Neurosci. 28:8539-8544.
9. Bedny M, Aguirre GK, Thompson-Schill SL. 2007. Item analysis in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 35:1093-1102.
10. Cant JS, Xu Y. 2012. Object ensemble processing in human anterior-medial ventral visual cortex. J Neurosci. 32:7685-7700.
11. Cate AD, Goodale MA, Kohler S. 2011. The role of apparent size in building-and object-specific regions of ventral visual cortex. Brain Res. 1388:109-122.
12. Diana RA, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. 2008. High-resolution multi-voxel pattern analysis of category selectivity in the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus. 18:536-541.
13. Dodell-Feder D, Koster-Hale J, Bedny M, Saxe R. 2011. fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task. Neuroimage. 55:705-712.
14. Downing PE, Jiang Y, Shuman M, Kanwisher N. 2001. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science. 293:2470-2473.
15. Epstein R, Harris A, Stanley D, Kanwisher N. 1999. The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron. 23:115-125.
16. Epstein R, Kanwisher N. 1998. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 392:598-601.
17. Epstein RA, Higgins JS. 2007. Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cereb Cortex. 17:1680-1693.
18. Epstein RA, MacEvoy SP. 2011. Making a scene in the brain. In: Harris L, Jenkin M, editors. Vision in 3D environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Epstein RA, Morgan LK. 2011. Neural responses to visual scenes reveals inconsistencies between fMRI adaptation and multivoxel pattern analysis. Neuropsychologia. 50:530-543.
20. Epstein RA, Parker WE, Feiler AM. 2007. Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. J Neurosci. 27:6141-6149.
21. Epstein RA, Ward EJ. 2010. How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area? Cereb Cortex. 20:294-303.
22. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC. 1999. Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat Neurosci. 2:568-573.
23. Harel A, Kravitz DJ, Baker CI. 2013. Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information. Cereb Cortex. 23:947-957.
24. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A. 1999. High-level scene perception. Ann Rev Psychol. 50:243-271.
25. Janzen G, Jansen C. 2010. A neural way finding mechanism adjusts for ambiguous landmark information. Neuroimage. 52:364-370.
26. Janzen G, van Turennout M. 2004. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nat Neurosci. 7:673-677.
27. Kanwisher N. 2010. Functional specificity in the human brain: a window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:11163-11170.
28. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. 1997. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci. 17:4302-4311.
29. Konkle T, Oliva A. 2011. Organizing visual object knowledge by real-world size in ventral visual cortex. J Vis. 11:883.
30. Kravitz DJ, Peng CS, Baker CI. 2011. Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places. J Neurosci. 31:7322-7333.
31. MacEvoy SP, Epstein RA. 2011. Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 14:1323-1329.
32. Morgan LK, Macevoy SP, Aguirre GK, Epstein RA. 2011. Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. J Neurosci. 31:1238-1245.
33. Mullally SL, Maguire EA. 2011. A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space. J Neurosci. 31:7441-7449.
34. Mur M, Ruff DA, Bodurka J, De Weerd P, Bandettini PA, Kriegeskorte N. 2012. Categorical, yet graded-single-image activation profiles of human category-selective cortical regions. J Neurosci. 32:8649-8662.
35. Park S, Brady TF, Greene MR, Oliva A. 2011. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. J Neurosci. 31:1333-1340.
36. Park S, Intraub H, Yi DJ, Widders D, Chun MM. 2007. Beyond the edges of a view: boundary extension in human scene-selective visual cortex. Neuron. 54:335-342.
37. Pruessner JC, Kohler S, Crane J, Pruessner M, Lord C, Byrne A, Kabani N, Collins DL, Evans AC. 2002. Volumetry of temporopolar, perirhinal, entorhinal and parahippocampal cortex from high-resolution MR images: considering the variability of the collateral sulcus. Cereb Cortex. 12:1342-1353.
38. Rajimehr R, Devaney KJ, Bilenko NY, Young JC, Tootell RB. 2011. The "parahippocampal place area" responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys. PLoS Biol. 9: e1000608.
39. Ross MG, Oliva A. 2010. Estimating perception of scene layout properties from global image features. J Vis. 10:21-25.
40. Schinazi VR, Epstein RA. 2010. Neural correlates of real-world route learning. Neuroimage. 53:725-735.
41. Spiridon M, Kanwisher N. 2002. How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study. Neuron. 35:1157-1165.
42. Walther DB, Caddigan E, Fei-Fei L, Beck DM. 2009. Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain. J Neurosci. 29:10573-10581.
43. Walther DB, Chai B, Caddigan E, Beck DM, Fei-Fei L. 2011. Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108: 9661-9666.
44. Ward EJ, MacEvoy SP, Epstein RA. 2010. Eye-centered encoding of visual space in scene-selective regions. J Vis. 10:6.
45. Yee E, Drucker DM, Thompson-Schill SL. 2010. fMRI-adaptation evidence of overlapping neural representations for objects related in function or manipulation. Neuroimage. 50:753-763.
46. Zeidman P, Mullally SL, Schwarzkopf DS, Maguire EA. 2012. Exploring the parahippocampal cortex response to high and low spatial frequency spaces. Neuroreport. 23:503-507.