Exploring the parahippocampal cortex response to high and low spatial frequency spaces

NeuroReport

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 503-507

  Zeidman, Peter ^a   Mullally, Sinéad L ^a   Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Samuel ^a   Maguire, Eleanor A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

functional magnetic resonance imaging; parahippocampal cortex; scenes; space; spatial frequency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; POSTERIOR PARAHIPPOCAMPAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861097208     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328353766a     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Epstein RA. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends Cogn Sci 2008;12:388-396.
2. Epstein RA. Cognitive neuroscience: scene layout from vision and touch. Curr Biol 2011;21:R437-R438.
3. Henderson JM, Larson CL, Zhu DC. Full scenes produce more activation than close-up scenes and scene-diagnostic objects in parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortex: an fMRI study. Brain Cogn 2008;66:40-49.
4. Park S, Chun MM. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception. Neuroimage 2009;47:1747-1756.
5. Epstein RA, Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998;392:598-601.
6. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004;5:617-629.
7. Bar M, Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003;38:347-358.
8. Epstein RA, Ward EJ. How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area? Cereb Cortex 2010;20:294-303.
9. Mullally SL, Maguire EA. A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space. J Neurosci 2011;31:7441-7449.
10. Rajimehr R, Devaney KJ, Bilenko NY, Young JC, Tootell R B H. The 'Parahippocampal Place Area' responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys. PLoS Biol 2011;9:e1000608.
11. Peyrin C, Baciu M, Segebarth C, Marendaz C. Cerebral regions and hemispheric specialization for processing spatial frequencies during natural scene recognition. An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2004;23:698-707.
12. Willenbockel V, Sadr J, Fiset D, Horne GO, Gosselin F, Tanaka JW. Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox. Beh Res Methods 2010;42:671-684.
13. Weiskopf N, Hutton C, Josephs O, Deichmann R. Optimal EPI parameters for reduction of susceptibility-induced BOLD sensitivity losses: a wholebrain analysis at 3 T and 1.5 T. Neuroimage 2006;33:493-504.
14. Svoboda E, McKinnon MC, Levine B. The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:2189-2208.
15. Spreng RN, Mar. RA, Kim AS. The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 2009;21:489-510.