Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1680-1693

  Epstein, Russell A ^a   Higgins, J Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

FMRI; Object recognition; Parahippocampal place area; Place recognition; Spatial memory; Visual system

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL TASK; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; SUBICULUM; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; ADULT; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 34547673611     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl079     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M. 1999. Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. Brain 122:1613-1628.
2. Aguirre GK, Detre JA, Alsop DC, DEsposito M. 1996. The parahippo-campus subserves topographical learning in man. Cereb Cortex 6:823-829.
3. Amedi A, von Kriegstein K, van Atteveldt NM, Beauchamp MS, Naumer MJ. 2005. Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition. Exp Brain Res 166:559-571.
4. Bar M. 2004. Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:617-629.
5. Bar M, Aminoff E. 2003. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38:347-358.
6. Beauchamp MS. 2005. See me, hear me, touch me: multisensory integration in lateral occipital-temporal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:145-153.
7. Beauchamp MS, Lee KE, Haxby JV, Martin A. 2002. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron 34:149-159.
8. Biederman I. 1972. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 177:77-80.
9. Biederman I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115-147.
10. Biederman I, Rabinowitz JC, Glass AL, Stacy EW Jr. 1974. On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. J Exp Psychol 103:597-600.
11. Bohbot VD, Kalina M, Stepankova K, Spackova N, Petrides M, Nadel L. 1998. Spatial memory deficits in patients with lesions to the right hippocampus and to the right parahippocampal cortex. Neuro-psychologia 36:1217-1238.
12. Brefczynski JA, DeYoe EA. 1999. A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nat Neurosci 2:370-374.
13. Burgess N, Maguire EA, Spiers HJ, O'Keefe J. 2001. A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events. Neuroimage 14:439-453.
14. Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A. 1999. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci 2:913-919.
15. Chun MM. 2003. Scene perception and memory. In: Irwin DE, Ross B, editors. Psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory: cognitive vision. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. p 79-108.
16. Chun MM, Jiang Y. 1998. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognit Psychol 36:28-71.
17. Cox D, Meyers E, Sinha P. 2004. Contextually evoked object-specific responses in human visual cortex. Science 304:115-117.
18. Davenport JL, Potter MC. 2004. Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychol Sci 15:559-564.
19. Diamond R, Carey S. 1986. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol Gen 115:107-117.
20. Downing PE, Chan AW, Peelen MV, Dodds CM, Kanwisher N. 2006. Domain specificity in visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 16:1453-1461
21. Epstein R, DeYoe EA, Press DZ, Rosen AC, Kanwisher N. 2001. Neuro-psychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex. Cogn Neuropsychol 18:481-508.
22. Epstein R, Graham KS, Downing PE. 2003. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron 37:865-876.
23. Epstein R, Harris A, Stanley D, Kanwisher N. 1999. The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron 23: 115-125.
24. Epstein R, Kanwisher N. 1998. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392:598-601.
25. Epstein RA. 2005. The cortical basis of visual scene processing. Vis Cogn 12:954-978.
26. Epstein RA, Higgins JS, Thompson-Schill SL. 2005. Learning places from views: variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability. J Cogn Neurosci 17:73-83.
27. Frith U, Frith CD. 2003. Development and neurophysiology of mentaliz-ing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:459-473.
28. Gauthier I. 2000. What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex? Trends Cogn Sci 4:1-2.
29. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC. 1999. Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat Neurosci 2:568-573.
30. Grill-Spector K. 2003. The neural basis of object perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:159-166.
31. Habib M, Sirigu A. 1987. Pure topographical disorientation-a definition and anatomical basis. Cortex 23:73-85.
32. Hasson U, Harel M, Levy I, Malach R. 2003. Large-scale mirror-symmetry organization of human occipito-temporal object areas. Neuron 37:1027-1041.
33. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4:223-233.
34. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A. 1999. High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol 50:243-271.
35. Hollingworth A, Henderson JM. 1998. Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? J Exp Psychol Gen 127:398-415.
36. Ino T, Inoue Y, Kage M, Hirose S, Kimura T, Fukuyama H. 2002. Mental navigation in humans is processed in the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus. Neurosci Lett 322:182-186.
37. Intraub H. 1997. The representation of visual scenes. Trends Cogn Sci 1:217-222.
38. Ishai A, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV. 2000. Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images. Neuron 28:979-990.
39. Janzen G, van Turennout M. 2004. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nat Neurosci 7:673-677.
40. Kable JW, Chatterjee A. The specificity of action representations in lateral occipitotemporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. Forthcoming.
41. Kanwisher N. 2004. The ventral visual object pathway in humans: evidence from fMRI. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS, editors. The visual neurosciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. p 1179-1189.
42. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. 1997. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 17:4302-4311.
43. Katayama K, Takahashi N, Ogawara K, Hattori T. 1999. Pure topographical disorientation due to right posterior cingulate lesion. Cortex 35:279-282.
44. Kohler S, Crane J, Milner B. 2002. Differential contributions of the parahippocampal place area and the anterior hippocampus to human memory for scenes. Hippocampus 12:718-723.
45. Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL. 2001. Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:635-642.
46. Kuipers B. 2000. The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artif Intell 119: 191-233.
47. Kuipers B, Modayil J, Beeson P, MacMahon M, Savelli F. 2004. Local metrical and global topological maps in the hybrid spatial semantic hierarchy. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automotion.
48. Levy I, Hasson U, Avidan G, Hendler T, Malach R. 2001. Center-periphery organization of human object areas. Nat Neurosci 4:533-539.
49. Logothetis NK, Sheinberg DL. 1996. Visual object recognition. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:577-621.
50. Maguire EA. 2001. The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. Scand J Psychol 42:225-238.
51. Maguire EA, Burgess N, Donnett JG, Frackowiak RSJ, Frith CD, O'Keefe J. 1998. Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. Science 280:921-924.
52. Maguire EA, Frackowiak RSJ, Frith CD. 1997. Recalling routes around London: activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. J Neurosci 17:7103-7110.
53. Maljkovic V, Martini P. 2005. Short-term memory for scenes with affective content. J Vis 5:215-229.
54. Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV. 1996. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379:649-652.
55. McCarthy G, Puce A, Gore JC, Allison T. 1997. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 9:605-610.
56. McNamara TP, Rump B, Werner S. 2003. Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychon Bull Rev 10:589-595.
57. Mendez MF, Cherrier MM. 2003. Agnosia for scenes in topographagno-sia. Neuropsychologia 41:1387-1395.
58. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. 2002. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 15:1-25.
59. O'Craven KM, Kanwisher N. 2000. Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. J Cogn Neurosci 12:1013-1023.
60. Oliva A, Torralba A. 2001. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int J Comp Vis 42:145-175.
61. Peelen MV, Downing PE. 2005. Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. J Neurophysiol 93:603-608.
62. Pelphrey KA, Morris JP, McCarthy G. 2004. Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1706-1716.
63. Potter MC. 1975. Meaning in visual search. Science 187:965-966.
64. Puce A, Allison T, Asgari M, Gore JC, McCarthy G. 1996. Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 16:5205-5215.
65. Puce A, Allison T, Bentin S, Gore JC, McCarthy G. 1998. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J Neurosci 18:2188-2199.
66. Renninger LW, Malik J. 2004. When is scene identification just texture recognition? Vision Res 44:2301-2311.
67. Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyesbraem P. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn Psychol 8:382-439.
68. Rosenbaum RS, Priselac S, Kohler S, Black SE, Gao FQ, Nadel L, Moscovitch M. 2000. Remote spatial memory in an amnesic person with extensive bilateral hippocampal lesions. Nat Neurosci 3: 1044-1048.
69. Rosenbaum RS, Ziegler M, Winocur G, Grady CL, Moscovitch M. 2004. "I have often walked down this street before": fMRI studies on the hippocampus and other structures during mental navigation of an old environment. Hippocampus 14:826-835.
70. Rousselet GA, Joubert OR, Fabre-Thorpe M. 2005. How long to get the "gist" of real-world natural scenes? Vis Cogn 12:852-877.
71. Saxe R, Xiao D, Kovacs G, Perrett DI, Kanwisher N. 2004. A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia 42:1435-1446.
72. Schyns PG, Oliva A. 1994. From blobs to boundary edges: evidence for time-and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychol Sci 5:195-200.
73. Shelton AL, Gabrieli JD. 2002. Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives. J Neurosci 22:2711-2717.
74. Somers DC, Dale AM, Seiffert AE, Tootell RBH. 1999. Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1663-1668.
75. Steeves JK, Humphrey GK, Culham JC, Menon RS, Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2004. Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for a contribution of color and texture information to scene classification in a patient with visual form agnosia. J Cogn Neurosci 16:955-965.
76. Sugiura M, Shah NJ, Zilles K, Fink GR. 2005. Cortical representations of personally familiar objects and places: functional organization of the human posterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 183-198.
77. Takahashi N, Kawamura M, Shiota J, Kasahata N, Hirayama K. 1997. Pure topographic disorientation due to right retrosplenial lesion. Neurology 49:464-469.
78. Tanaka K. 1993. Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science 262:685-686.
79. Teng E, Squire LR. 1999. Memory for places learned long ago is intact after hippocampal damage. Nature 400:675-677.
80. Torralba A, Oliva A. 2003. Statistics of natural image categories. Neural Syst 14:391-412.
81. Tversky B, Hemenway K. 1983. Categories of environmental scenes. Cognit Psychol 15:121-149.
82. Wolbers T, Buchel C. 2005. Dissociable retrosplenial and hippocampal contributions to successful formation of survey representations. J Neurosci 25:3333-3340.