Reframing Practice: Teacher Learning Through Interactions in a Collaborative Group

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 347-372

  Bannister, Nicole A ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938419648     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2014.999196     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. N.Bannister, (in press). A framing methodology for analyzing learning in mathematics teacher communities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
2. S.Barab,, M.Barnett,, & K.Squire, (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 489–542.
3. R.D.Benford,, & D.A.Snow, (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
4. J.Boaler, (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239–258.
5. J.Boaler, (2006). Opening our ideas: How a de-tracked math approach promoted respect, responsibility and high achievement. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 40–46.
6. J.Boaler,, & M.Staples, (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record, 110, 608–645.
7. Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (2002). Professional development that supports school mathematics reform (Foundations Monograph No. 3). Retrieved from the National Science Foundation website: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02084/NSF02084.pdf
8. J.Bransford,, A.Brown,, & R.Cocking, (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
9. A.L.Brown,, & J.C.Campione, (1992). Students as researchers and teachers. In J.W.Keefe & H.J.Walberg (Eds.), Teaching for thinking (pp. 49–57). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
10. P.Cobb,, K.McClain,, T.Lamberg,, & C.Dean, (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
11. C.E.Coburn,, & M.K.Stein, (2006). Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional community in policy implementation. In M.Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 25–46). Albany: State University of New York Press.
12. M.Cochran-Smith,, & S.L.Lytle, (1992). Communities for teacher research: Fringe or forefront? American Journal of Education, 100, 298–325.
13. M.Cochran-Smith,, & K.Zeichner, (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. E.G.Cohen, (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15. M.Cole, (2006). The fifth dimension: An after-school program built on diversity. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
16. M.W.Curry, (2008). Critical friends groups: The possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform. Teachers College Record, 114, 733–774.
17. L.Darling-Hammond, (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Darling-Hammond, L. (2014, June 30). To close the achievement gap, we need to close the teaching gap. Retrieved from The Huffington Post website: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-darlinghammond/to-close-the-achievement_b_5542614.html
19. L.Darling-Hammond,, & J.Bransford, (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. A.M.Dooner,, D.Mandzuk,, & R.A.Clifton, (2008). Stages of collaboration and the realities of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 564–574.
21. A.H.Dyson, (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22. R.Emerson,, R.Fretz,, & L.Shaw, (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. L.Evans, (2002). What is teacher development? Oxford Review of Education, 28(1), 123–137.
24. C.M.Fairbanks,, & D.LaGrone, (2006). Learning together: Constructing knowledge in a teacher research group. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 7–25.
25. D.Fendel,, D.Resek,, L.Alper,, & S.Fraser, (1997). Interactive mathematics program. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
26. E.Goffman, (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
27. P.Grossman,, S.Wineburg,, & S.Woolworth, (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.
28. R.Gutiérrez, (1996). Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 495–592.
29. R.Gutiérrez, (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In B.Herbel-Eisenmann, J.Choppin, D.Wagner, & D.Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education (pp. 17–33). New York, NY: Springer.
30. A.Hargreaves, (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
31. I.S.Horn, (2004). Why do students drop advanced mathematics? Educational Leadership, 62(3), 61–64.
32. I.S.Horn, (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207–236.
33. I.S.Horn, (2006). Lessons learned from detracked mathematics departments. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 72–81.
34. I.S.Horn, (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.
35. I.S.Horn, (2008). Turnaround students in high school mathematics: Constructing identities of competence through mathematical worlds. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(3), 201–239.
36. I.S.Horn, (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259.
37. I.S.Horn, (2012). Strength in numbers: Collaborative learning in secondary mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
38. I.S.Horn,, & J.W.Little, (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217.
39. S.Jacoby,, & E.Ochs, (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183.
40. P.Kelly, (2006). What is teacher learning? A socio-cultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32, 505–519.
41. J.Lave,, & E.Wenger, (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. T.Levine, (2010). Tools for the study and design of collaborative teacher learning: The affordances of different conceptions of teacher community and activity theory. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(1), 109–130.
43. J.W.Little, (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 913–945.
44. J.W.Little,, & I.S.Horn, (2007). ‘Normalizing’ problems of practice: Converting routine conversation into a resource for learning in professional communities. In L.Stoll & K.S.Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 79–92). London, England: Open University Press.
45. R.A.Lotan, (2003). Group-worthy tasks. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 72–75.
46. M.W.McLaughlin,, & J.E.Talbert, (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. S.Merriam, (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48. R.P.Moses,, & C.E.Cobb, (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
49. National Academy of Education. (2008). Taking stock of the research on teacher professional communities. National Academy of Education Notes, 10(1), 1–12.
50. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to action: An urgent agenda for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
51. S.Printy, (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226.
52. T.Russell,, & H.Munby, (1991). Reframing: The role of experience in developing teachers’ professional knowledge. In D.Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn (pp. 164–187). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
53. K.Ruthven, (1987). Ability stereotyping in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(3), 243–253.
54. M.Sherin,, & S.Han, (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–183.
55. D.A.Snow,, & R.D.Benford, (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B.Klandermans, H.Kriesi, & S.G.Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research (Vol. 1, pp. 197–217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
56. A.Thompson, (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D.A.Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
57. E.Wenger, (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.