Adaptive Instructional Systems

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 469-484

  Lee, Jung ^a   Park, Ok Choon ^b  

^a RICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b Institute of Education Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive hypermedia systems (AHSs): Combining micro adaptive systems and hypermedia systems to provide adaptive adaptable, hybrid features by presenting learners with choices, along with guidance.; Adaptive instructional systems: Any forms of educational intervention aimed at accommodating individual learner differences.; Aptitude treatment interactions (ATIs): Adapting specific instructional procedures and strategies to specific learner characteristics (or aptitudes).; Macro adaptive systems: Allowing different alternatives for choosing instructional goals, curriculum content, and delivery systems, by grouping students.; Micro adaptive systems: Diagnosing the learner s specific learning needs during instruction and providing instructional prescriptions for the needs.

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938352171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880869-41     Document Type: Chapter

References (159)

1. Akhras, F. N. (2004). From Modelling Teaching Strategies to Modelling Affordances. Paper presented at Workshop on Modelling Human Teaching Tactics and Strategies, August 30, Maceio, Alagoas, Brazil (http://www.cenpra.gov.br/noticiaseeventos/its04workshop/akhras.pdf).
2. Akhras, F. N. and Self, A. J. (2000). System intelligence in constructivist learning. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 11(4), 344-376.
3. Akhras, F. N. and Self, J. A. (2002). Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: situations, interactions, processes and affordances. Instruct. Sci., 30(1), 1-30.
4. Albrecht, F., Koch, N., and Tiller, T. (2000). SmexWeb: An adaptive Web-based hypermedia teaching system. J. Interact. Learn. Res., 11(3/4), 367-388.
5. Aleven, V., Popescu, O., and Koedinger, K. R. (2001). Towards tutorial dialog to support self-explanation: adding natural language understanding to a cognitive tutor. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, edited by J. Moore, L. Redfield, and W. Johnson, pp. 246-255. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
6. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K. R., and Popescu, O. (2003a). A tutorial dialog system to support self-explanation: evaluation and open questions. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AI-ED 2003, edited by U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo, and J. Kay, pp. 39-46. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
7. Aleven V., Popescu, O., Ogan, A., and Koedinger, K. R. (2003b). A formative classroom evaluation of a tutorial dialogue system that supports self-explanation. In Supplemental Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2003. Vol. VI. Workshop on Tutorial Dialogue Systems: With a View toward the Classroom, edited by V. Aleven, U. Hoppe, J. Kay, R. Mizoguchi, H. Pain, F. Verdejo, and K. Yacef, pp. 345-355. Sydney: School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney.
8. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., and Wallace, R. M. (2003c). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Rev. Educ. Res., 73(2), 277-320.
9. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Roll, I., and Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Toward tutoring help seeking: applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS-2004), edited by J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari, and F. Paraguacu, pp. 227-239. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10. Aleven V., McLaren, B. M., Roll, I., and Koedinger, K. R. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: a model of helpseeking with a cognitive tutor. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 16, 101-130.
11. Andriessen, J. and Sandberg, J. A. C. (1999) Where is education heading and how about AI? Int. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130-150.
12. Atkinson, C. R. (1968). Computerized instruction and the learning process. Am. Psychol., 23, 225-239.*
13. Atkinson, C. R. (1976). Adaptive instructional systems: some attempts to optimize the learning process. In Cognition and Instruction, edited by D. Klahr, pp. 81-108. New York: Wiley.*
14. Avgeriou, P., Vogiatzis, D., Tzanavari, A., and Retalis, S. (2004). Design patterns in adaptive Web-based educational systems: an overview. In Advanced Technology for Learning: Innovations in Advanced Technology for Learning: Authoring for Adaptive Educational Hypermedia. Calgary, Canada: ACTA Press.
15. Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educ. Psychol., 40(4), 193-197.
16. Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educ. Psychol., 40(4), 199-209.
17. Beaumont, I. (1994). User modeling in the interactive anatomy tutoring system NATOM-TUTOR. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 4, 121-145.
18. Berliner, D. C. and Cahen, L. S. (1973). Trait-treatment interaction and learning. Rev. Res. Educ., 1, 58-94.
19. Block, J. H. (1980). Promoting excellence through mastery learning. Theory Pract., 19(1), 66-74.
20. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Res., 13, 4-16.*
21. Brown, E., Cristea, A., Stewart, C., and Brailsford, T. (2005). Patterns in authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia: a taxonomy of learning styles. Educ. Technol. Soc., 8(3), 77-90 (special issue on authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia).
22. Brusilovsky, P. (1994). Adaptive hypermedia: the state of the art. In Proceedings of East-West International Conference on Multimedia, Hypermedia and Virtual Reality, September 14-16, Moscow, edited by P. Brusilovsky, pp. 24-29. Moscow: ICSTI.*
23. Brusilovsky, P. (1996) Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 6(2-3), 87-129.*
24. Brusilovsky, P. (2000). Adaptive hypermedia: from intelligent tutoring systems to Web-based education. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, LNCS 1839, edited by G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, and K. Van Lehn, pp. 1-7. Berlin: Springer.
25. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 11, 87-110.
26. Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: the role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 34(4), 487-497.
27. Brusilovsky, P. (2004). Adaptive navigation support: from adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive Web and beyond. PsychNology, 2(1), 7-23.
28. Brusilovsky, P. and Cooper, D. W. (2002). Domain, task, and user models for an adaptive hypermedia performance support system. In Proceedings of 2002 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, January 13-16, San Francisco, CA, edited by Y. Gil and D. B. Leake, pp. 23-30. Washington, D.C.: ACM Press.
29. Brusilovsky, P. and Pesin, L. (1994). An intelligent learning environment for CDS/ISIS users. In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Complex Learning in Computer Environments: Technology in School, University, Work and Life-Long Education (CLCE94), May 16-19, Joensuu, Finland, edited by J. J. Levonen and M. T. Tukianinen, pp. 29-33.
30. Brusilovsky, P. and Pesin, L. (1998). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: an evaluation of the ISISTutor. J. Comput. Inform. Technol., 6(1), 27-38.
31. Brusilovsky, P. and Rizzo, R. (2002). Map-based horizontal navigation in educational hypertext. J. Digit. Inform., 3(1) (http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v03/i01/Brusilovsky/).
32. Brusilovsky, P. and Vassileva, J. (1996). Preface. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 6(2-3), v-vi.
33. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., and Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: an intelligent tutoring system on the World Wide Web. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, LNCS 1086, edited by C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, and A. Lesgold, pp. 261-269. Berlin: Springer.
34. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J., and Schwarz, E. (1998). Web-based education for all: a tool for developing adaptive courseware. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst., 30(1-7), 291-300.
35. Burns, B. R. (1980). Relation of aptitude learning at different points in time during instruction. J. Educ. Psychol., 72, 785-797.
36. Calvi, L. and Cristea, A. I. (2002). Towards generic adaptive systems: analysis of a case study. Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems: Proceedings of AH’02, edited by P. De Bra, pp. 79-89. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/~acristea/Conferences/02/AH02/calvicristea-final-w-header-ah2002.pdf).
37. Carrier, C. (1984). Do learners make good choices? Instruct. Innov., 29, 15-17, 48.
38. Carrier, C. and Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Adapting courseware to accommodate individual differences. In Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware, edited by D. Jonassen, pp. 61-96. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Carroll, J. and McKendree, J. (1987). Interface design issues for advice-giving expert systems. Commun. ACM, 30(1), 14-31.
40. Chi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., and Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cogn. Sci., 13, 145-182.
41. Corno, L. and Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by M. Wittrock, pp. 605-629. New York: Macmillan.*
42. Cristea, A. I. (2004). Is semi-automatic authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia possible? Adv. Technol. Learn., 1(4), 227-236.
43. Cristea, A. I. (2005). Authoring of adaptive hypermedia; adaptive hypermedia and learning environments. In Advances in Web-Based Education: Personalized Learning Environment, edited by S. Y. Chen and G. D. Magoulas. Hershey: IDEA (http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/~acristea/Chen/AHChenBookChapt-camera Ready2. doc).
44. Cristea, A. I. and Calvi, L. (2003). The Three Layers of Adaptation Granularity, LNCS 2702, Berlin: Springer.
45. Cristea, A. I. and De Bra, P. (2002). ODL Education Environments Based on Adaptability and Adaptivity. Paper presented at E-Learn’2002 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, October 15-19, Montreal, (http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/~acristea/Conferences/02/ELEARN02/Cristea-Adaptation-Adaptability.pdf).
46. Cristea, A. I. and Garzotto, F. (2004). Designing Patterns for Adaptive or Adaptable Educational Hypermedia: A Taxonomy, Morgantown, WV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/~acristea/HTMP/Minerva/papers/Garzotto-Cristea-symposiumpatterns-2give.doc).
47. Cronbach, J. L. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am. Psychol., 12, 671-684.*
48. Cronbach, J. L. (1967) How can instruction be adapted to individual differences? In Learning and Individual Differences, edited by R. M. Gagné, Ed., pp. 353-379, Columbus, OH: Merrill.*
49. Cronbach, J. L. and Snow, E. R. (1977). Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvingston.*
50. Crowder, N. W. (1959). Automatic Tutoring: The State of Art. New York: Wiley.
51. de Assis, P., Schwabe, D., and Barbosa, S. (2004). Meta-models for adaptive hypermedia applications and meta-adaptation. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, edited by P. Kommers and G. Richards, pp. 1720-1727. Morgantown, WV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
52. De Bra, P. (2000). Pros and cons of adaptive hypermedia in Web-based education. J. CyberPsychol. Behav., 3(1), 71-77.
53. De Bra, P., Aroyo, L., and Chepegin, V. (2004). The next big thing: adaptive Web-based systems, J. Digit. Inform., 5(1), Article No. 247 (http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v05/i01/DeBra/).
54. De Bra, P., Santic, T., and Brusilovsky, P. (2003). AHA! meets Interbook, and more…. In Proceedings of World Conference on the E-Learning, E-Learn 2003, edited by A. Rossett, pp. 57-64. Morgantown, WV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
55. De Bra, P., Stash, N., and Smits, D. (2005). Creating Adaptive Web-Based Applications, tutorial at the 10th Int. Conf. on User Modeling, July 25, Edinburgh, Scotland (retrieved from htto://wwwis.win.tue.nl/~debra/um2005/tutorial.pdf).
56. De Vicente, A. and Pain, H. (2002) Informing the detection of the students’ motivational state: an empirical study. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, LCNS 2363, edited by S. A. Cerri, G. Gouarderes, and F. Paraguacu, pp. 933-943. Berlin: Springer.
57. del Soldato, T. and du Boulay, B. (1995). Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 6(4), 337-376.
58. Dewey, J. (1902/1964). The child and the curriculum. In John Dewey on Education: Selected Writings, edited by R. D. Archambault, pp. 339-358. New York: Modern Library.
59. Dick, W. and Carey, L. (1985). The Systematic Design of Instruction, 2nd ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
60. DiVesta, F. J. (1975). Trait-treatment interactions, cognitive processes, and research on communication media. AV Commun. Rev., 23, 185-196.
61. du Boulay, B. and Luckin, R. (2001). Modeling human teaching tactics and strategies for tutoring systems. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 12, 235-256.
62. Eklund, J. and Sinclair, K. (2000) An empirical appraisal of the effectiveness of adaptive interfaces for instructional systems. Educ. Technol. Soc., 3(4), 165-177.
63. Federico, P. (1983). Changes in the cognitive components of achievement as students proceed through computer-managed instruction. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 9(4), 156-168.
64. Federico, P., Montague, E. W., and Snow, E. R. (1980). Adaptive Instruction: Trends and Issues. Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, Cognitive Process Analyses of Aptitude. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Fink, J., Kobsa, A., and Nill, A. (1998). Adaptable and adaptive information provision for all users, including disabled and elderly people. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia, 4, 163-188.
66. Fischer, G., Mastaglio, T., Reeves, B., and Rieman, J. (1990). Minimalist explanations in knowledge-based systems. In Proceedings of 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, edited by L. W. Hoevel and V. Milutinovic, pp. 309-317. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
67. Flanagan, J. C., Shanner, W. M., Brudner, H. J., and Marker, R. W. (1975). An individualized instructional system: PLAN. In Systems of Individualized Education, edited by H. Talmadge Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
68. Gagné, R. M. and Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of Instructional Design, 2nd ed. New York: Holt.
69. Glaser, R. (1977). Adaptive Education: Individual, Diversity and Learning. New York: Holt.*
70. Glaser, R. and Resnick, L. B. (1972). Instructional psychology. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 23, 207-276.
71. Gonschorek, M. and Herzog, C. (1995). Using hypertext for an adaptive help system in an intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings of AI-ED’95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, edited by J. Greer, pp. 274-281. Morgantown, WV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
72. Hall, A. K. (1977). A research model for applying computer technology to the interactive instructional process. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 3, 68-75.
73. Hanani, U., Shapira, B., and Shoval, P. (2001). Information filtering: overview of issues, research and systems. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 11(3), 203-259.
74. Hansen, D. N., Ross, M. S., and Rakow, E. (1977). Adaptive Models for Computer-Based Training Systems, Annual Report to Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. Memphis, TN: Memphis State University.
75. Hart, R. S. (1981). Language study and the PLATO IV System. Studies Lang. Learn., 3, 1-24.
76. Henze, N. and Nejdl, W. (1999). Adaptivity in the KBS Hyperbook System. In Proc. of the Second Workshop on Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web (WWW), May 11-14, Toronto, Canada (http://www.kbs.uni-hannover.de/~henze/paperadaptivity/Henze.html).
77. Henze, N. and Nejdl, W. (2001) Adaptation in open corpus hypermedia. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 12(4), 325-350.
78. Hohl, H., Boecker, D., and Gunzenhaeuser, R. (1996). Hypadapter: an adaptive hypertext system for exploratory learning and programming. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., 6(2-3), 131-156.
79. Holland, G. J. (1977). Variables in adaptive decisions in individualized instruction. Educ. Psychol., 12, 146-161.*
80. Jermann, P., Soller, A., and Lesgold, A. (2004). Computer software support for CSCL. In What We Know About CSCL… and Implementing It in Higher Education, edited by P. Dillenbourg, J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, and R. L. Martens pp. 141-166. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
81. Karagiannidis, C., Sampson, D., and Cardinali, F. (2001). Integrating adaptive educational content into different courses and curricula. Educ. Technol. Soc., 4(3), 37-44
82. Kay, J. and Kummerfeld, J. R. (1994). An individualized course for the C programming language. In Proceedings of the Second International WWW Conf., October 17-20, Chicago, IL (http://www.cs.usyd.edu.au/~bob/kay-kummerfeld.html).
83. Kayama, M. and Okamoto, T. (1998). A mechanism for knowledge navigation in hyperspace with neural networks to support exploring activities. In Proceedings of Current Trends and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshop at the 4th World Congress on Expert Systems, edited by G. Ayala, pp. 41-48. Mexico City: ITESM.
84. Keller, F. S. and Sherman, J. G. (1974). The Keller Plan Handbook. Menlo Park, CA: W.A. Benjamin.
85. Klausmeier, H. J. (1975). IGE: an alternative form of schooling. In Systems of Individualized Education, edited by H. Talmage, pp. 48-83. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
86. Koedinger, K. R. and Anderson, J. R. (1998). Illustrating principled design: the early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization. Interact. Learn. Environ., 5, 161-180.
87. Kulik, A. J. (1982). Individualized systems of instruction. In Encyclopedia of Educational Research 5th ed., edited by H. E. Mitzel, p. 2. New York: Macmillan.
88. Landa, L. N. (1976). Instructional Regulation and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.*
89. Lesgold, A. (2001). The nature and methods of learning by doing. Am. Psychol., 56(11), 964-973.*
90. Lesgold, A. M., Lajoie, S. P., Bunzo, M., and Eggan, G. (1992). SHERLOCK: a coached practice environment for an electronics troubleshooting job. In Computer Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Shared Issues and Complementary Approaches, edited by J. Larkin and R. Chabay, pp. 201-238. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
91. Lester, J. C., Towns, S. G., and Fitzgerald, P. J. (1999). Achieving affective impact: visual emotive communication in lifelike pedagogical agents. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 10(3-4), 278-291.
92. Leutner, D. (2004). Instructional design principles for adaptivity in open learning environments. In Curriculum, Plans, and Processes in Instructional Design, edited by N. M. Seel and S. Dijkstra, pp. 289-307. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
93. Luckin R. and du Boulay B. (1999). Ecolab: the development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 10, 198-220.
94. Maki, H. R. and Maki, S. W. (2002). Multimedia comprehension skill predicts differential outcomes of Web-based and lecture courses. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., 8, 85-98.
95. Merrill, M. D. and Boutwell, R. C. (1973). Instructional development: methodology and research. In Review of Research in Education, edited by F. Kerlinger, pp. 95-131. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
96. Moore, A., Stewart, C. D., Martin, D., Brailsford, T. J., and Ashman, H. (2004). Links for Learning: Linking for an Adaptive Learning Environment. Paper presented at the Third IASTED Int. Conf. on Web-Based Education. February 16-18, Innsbruck, Austria (http://whurle.sourceforge.net/wbe04.pdf).
97. Ohlsson, S. (1987). Some principles of intelligent tutoring. In Artificial Intelligence and Education, edited by R. W. Lawler and M. Yazdani, pp. 203-237. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
98. Ohlsson, S. (1993). Learning to do and learning to understand: a lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. In Learning in Humans and Machines, edited by P. Reimann and H. Spada, pp. 37-62. Oxford: Pergamon Press.*
99. Oppermann, R. (1994). Adaptively supported adaptability. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 40, 455-472.
100. Or-Bach, R. and van Joolingen, W. R. (2004). Designing adaptive interventions for online collaborative modeling. Educ. Inform. Technol., 9, 355-375.
101. Park, O. (1996). Adaptive instructional systems. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, edited by D. H. Jonassen, pp. 634-664. New York: Macmillan.*
102. Park, O. and Lee, J. (2003). Adaptive instructional systems. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by D. H. Jonassen, pp. 651-684. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
103. Park, O. and Seidel, R. J. (1989). A multidisciplinary model for development of intelligent computer-assisted instruction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 37, 72-80.
104. Park, O. and Tennyson, D. R. (1980). Adaptive design strategies for selecting number and presentation order of examples in coordinate concept acquisition. J. Educ. Psychol., 72, 362-370.*
105. Park, O. and Tennyson, D. R. (1986). Computer-based responsesensitive design strategies for selecting presentation form and sequence of examples in learning of coordinate concepts. J. Educ. Psychol., 78, 23-28.
106. Park, O., Perez, R. S., and Seidel, J. R. (1987). Intelligent CAI: old wine in new bottles or a new vintage? In Artificial Intelligence and Instruction: Applications and Methods, edited by G. Kearsley, pp. 11-45. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
107. Peterson, L. P. (1977). Review of human characteristics and school learning. Am. Educ. Res. J., 14, 73-79.
108. Peterson, P. L. and Janicki, T. C. (1979). Individual characteristics and children’s learning in large-group and small-group approaches. J. Educ. Psychol., 71, 677-687.
109. Peterson, P. L., Janicki, T. C., and Swing, S. (1981). Ability X treatment interaction effects on children’s learning in largegroup and small-group approaches. Am. Educ. Res. J., 18, 453-473.
110. Quintana, C., Zhang, M., and Krajcik, J.(2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educ. Psychol., 40(4), 235-244.
111. Rebolledo Mendez, G., du Boulay, B., and Luckin, R. (2006). Motivating the Learner: An Empirical Evaluation. Paper presented at the 8th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Learning Systems, June 26-30, Jhongli, Taiwan (http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users/bend/papers/ITS2006.pdf).
112. Reiser, A. R. (1987). Instructional technology: a history. In Instructional Technology Foundations, edited by R. M. Gagné, pp.11-48. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
113. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Ryu, E., Baker, R., and Koedinger, K. R. (2006). The Help Tutor: Does Metacognitive Feedback Improve Students’ Help-Seeking Actions, Skills and Learning? Paper presented at the 8th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Learning Systems, June 26-30, Jhongli, Taiwan (http://www.pitt.edu/~bmclaren/HelpTutor-ITS2006.pdf).
114. Ross, S. M. and Anand, F. (1986). Using Computer-Based Instruction to Personalize Math Learning Materials for Elementary School Children. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, April, San Francisco, CA.
115. Ross, S. M. and Morrison, G. R. (1986). Adaptive instructional strategies for teaching rules in mathematics. Educ. Commun. Technol. J., 30, 67-74.
116. Ross, S. M. and Morrison, G. R. (1988). Adapting instruction to learner performance and background variables. In Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware, edited by D. H. Jonassen, pp. 227-243. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
117. Ross, S. M. and Rakow, E. A. (1981). Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules. J. Educ. Psychol., 73, 745-753.
118. Rothen, W. and Tennyson, D. R. (1977). Pre-task and on-task adaptive design strategies for selecting number of instances in concept acquisition. J. Educ. Psychol., 69, 586-592
119. Rothen, W. and Tennyson, D. R. (1978). Application of Bayes’ theory in designing computer-based adaptive instructional strategies. Educ. Psychol., 12, 317-323.
120. Scandura, J. M. (1977a). Problem Solving: A Structural/Processes Approach with Instructional Implications. New York: Academic Press.*
121. Scandura, J. M. (1977b). Structural approach to instructional problems. Am. Psychol., 32, 33-53.
122. Scandura, J. M. (1983). Instructional strategies based on the structural learning theory. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, edited by C. M. Reigeluth, pp. 213-249. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
123. Schwarz, E., Brusilovsky, P., and Weber, G. (1996). World Wide Intelligent Textbooks. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Telecommunications, June 1-22, Boston, MA (http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~plb/EDMEDIA-96.html).
124. Seidel, R. J. and Park, O. (1994). An historical perspective and a model for evaluation of intelligent tutoring systems. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 10, 103-128.*
125. Seidel, R. J., Wagner, H., Rosenblatt, R. D., Hillelsohn, M. J., and Stelzer, J. (1978). Learner control of instructional sequencing within an adaptive tutorial CAI environment. Instruct. Sci., 7, 37-80.
126. Seidel, R. J., Park, O., and Perez, R. (1989). Expertise of CAI: development requirements. Comput. Hum. Behav., 4, 235-256.
127. Shapiro, A. M. and Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by D. H. Jonassen, pp. 605-620. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
128. Shute, V. J. and Psotka, J. (1996). Intelligent tutoring systems: past, present and future. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, edited by D. Jonassen, pp. 570-600. New York: Macmillan.*
129. Shute, V. J. and Towle, B. (2003). Adaptive e-learning. Educ. Psychol., 38(2), 105-114.
130. Snow, E. R. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educ. Psychol., 15, 151-158.*
131. Snow, E. R. and Swanson, J. (1992). Instructional psychology: aptitude, adaptation, and assessment. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 43, 583-626.
132. Söller, A. L. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 12, 40-62.
133. Söller, A. L., Martínez-Monés, A., Jermann, P., and Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: a review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 15(4), 261-290.
134. Specht, M. and Oppermann, R. (1998). ACE: adaptive courseware environment. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia, 4, 141-161.
135. Steinacker, A., Seeberg, C., Rechenberger, K., Fischer, S., and Steinmetz, R. (1998). Dynamically Generated Tables of Contents as Guided Tours in Adaptive Hypermedia Systems. Paper presented at ED-MEDIA/EDTELECOM’99, 11th World Conf. on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia and World Conf. on Educational Telecommunications, June 19-24, Seattle, WA (http://www.kom.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de/publications/abstracts/SSR+99-1.html).
136. Steinberg, E. R. (1991). Computer-Assisted Instruction: A Synthesis of Theory, Practice, and Technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
137. Suppes, P., Fletcher, J. D., and Zanottie, M. (1976). Models of individual trajectories in computer-assisted instruction for deaf students. J. Educ. Psychol., 68, 117-127.
138. Tennyson, D. R. (1975). Adaptive instructional models for concept acquisition. Educ. Technol., 15(4), 7-15.
139. Tennyson, R. D. and Christensen, D. L. (1988). MAIS: an intelligent learning system. In Instructional Designs for Micro-Computer Courseware, edited by D. Jonassen, pp. 247-274. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
140. Tennyson, R. D. and Park, O. (1987). Artificial intelligence and computer based learning. In Instructional Technology: Foundations, edited by R. M. Gagné, pp. 319-342. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
141. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Individuality. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.*
142. Tobias, S. (1976). Achievement-treatment interactions. Rev. Educ. Res., 46, 61-74.
143. Tobias, S. (1987). Learner characteristics. In Instructional Technology: Foundations, edited by R. M. Gagné, pp. 207-231. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
144. Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to students characteristics. Educ. Psychol., 24(3), 213-227.*
145. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Rev. Educ. Res., 64, 37-54.
146. van Merriënboer, J. (2005). Learners in a Changing Learning Landscape: Reflections from an Instructional Design Perspective. Paper presented at the Presidential Workshop and Panel Session at the International Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), October 18-22, Orlando, FL (http://www.learndev.org/dl/ibstpi-AECT2005-Merrienboer.pdf#search=%22Merrienboer%20mass-individualization%22).*
147. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
148. Wang, M. (1980). Adaptive instruction: building on diversity. Theory Pract., 19, 122-128.*
149. Wang, M. and Lindvall, C. M. (1984). Individual differences and school learning environments. Rev. Res. Educ., 11, 161-225.
150. Wang, M., Oates, J., and Whiteshew, N. (1995). Effective school responses to student diversity in inner-city schools: a coordinated approach. Educ. Urban Soc., 27(4), 484-503.
151. Wasson, B. B. (1990). Determining the Focus of Instruction: Content Planning for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Ph.D. thesis. Saskatchewan: Department of Computational Science, University of Saskatchewan.
152. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.
153. White, B. Y., Shimoda, T. A., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: computer support for metacognitive development. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 10, 151-182.
154. Whitener, E. M. (1989). A meta-analytic review of the effect on learning of the interaction between prior achievement and instructional support. Rev. Educ. Res., 59, 65-86.
155. Williams, D. M. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, edited by D.H. Jonassen, pp. 957-982. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
156. Wood, H. and Wood, D. J. (1996). Contingency in tutoring and learning. Learn. Instruct., 6(4), 391-398.
157. Wood, H. and Wood, D. J. (1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Comput. Educ., 33(2/3), 153-170.
158. Wood, H., Wood, D. J., and Marston, L. (1998). A Computer-Based Assessment Approach to Whole Number Addition and Subtraction, Technical Report No. 56. Nottingham, U.K.: Centre for Research in Development, Instruction and Training, University of Nottingham.*
159. Zimmerman, B. J. and Tsikalas, K. E. (2005). Can computerbased learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning? Educ. Psychol., 40(4), 267-271.