Does country context distance determine subsidiary decision-making autonomy? Theory and evidence from European transition economies

International Business Review

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 874-889

  de Jong, Gjalt ^a   van Dut, Vo ^b   Jindra, Björn ^c   Marek, Philipp ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b CAN THO UNIVERSITY   (Viet Nam)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^d HALLE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central and Eastern European transition economies; Country context distance; Decision making autonomy; Headquarters subsidiary relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937968646     PISSN: 09695931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Akerlof G.A. The market for 'lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1970, 84:488-500.
2. Ambos B., Asakawa K., Ambos T.C. A dynamic perspective of subsidiary autonomy. Global Strategic Journal 2011, 1:301-316.
3. Ambos T.C., Ambos B. The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management 2009, 15:1-14.
4. Ambos T.C., Håkonson L. The concept of distance in international management. Journal of International Management 2014, 20:1-7.
5. Andersson U., Björkman I., Forsgren M. Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review 2005, 14:521-538.
6. Andersson U., Forsgren M. Subsidiary embeddedness and control in multinational corporations. International Business Review 1996, 5:487-508.
7. Andersson U., Forsgren M., Holm U. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 2007, 38:802-818.
8. Asakawa K. External-internal links and overseas autonomy-control tension: The management dilemma of the Japanese R&D in Europe. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1996, 43:24-32.
9. Asakawa K. Organizational tension in international R&D management: The case of Japanese firms. Research Policy 2001, 30:735-757.
10. Avloniti A., Filippaios F. Unbundling the differences between psychic and cultural distance: An empirical examination of the existing measures. International Business Review 2014, 23:660-674.
11. Bartlett C.A., Ghoshal S. Managing across borders: The transnational solution 1989, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
12. Berry H., Guillen M., Zhou N. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41:1460-1480.
13. Beugelsdijk S., Mudambi R. MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies 2013, 44:413-426.
14. Beugelsdijk S., Slangen A., Maseland R., Onrust M. The impact of home-host cultural distance on foreign affiliate sales: The moderating role of cultural variation within host countries. Journal of Business Research 2014, 67:1638-1646.
15. Birkinshaw J., Hood N. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23:773-795.
16. Birkinshaw J., Hood N. Characteristics of foreign subsidiaries in industry clusters. Journal of International Business Studies 2000, 31:141-154.
17. Birkinshaw J., Hood N., Jonsson S. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19:221-241.
18. Blaine M. Comparing the profitability of firms in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Management International Review 1994, 34:125-148.
19. Boyacigiller N. The role of expatriates in the management of interdependence, complexity and risk in multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 1990, 21:357-381.
20. Brewer P.A. Operationalizing psychic distance: A revised approach. Journal of International Marketing 2007, 15:44-66.
21. Brooke M.Z. Centralization and autonomy: A study in organizational behavior 1984, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London/New York.
22. Cantwell J., Mudambi R. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal 2005, 26:1109-1128.
23. Castellani D., Jimenez A., Zanfei A. How remote are R&D labs? Distance factors and international innovative activities. Journal of International Business Studies 2013, 44:649-675.
24. Chang E., Taylor M.S. Control in multinational corporations (MNCs): The case of Korean manufacturing subsidiaries. Journal of Management 1999, 25:541-565.
25. Chang S.J., van Witteloostuijn A., Eden L. From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41:178-184.
26. Chiao Y., Ying L. Network effect and subsidiary autonomy in multinational corporations: An investigation of Taiwanese subsidiaries. International Business Review 2013, 22:652-662.
27. Ciabuschi F., Forsgren M., Martín O.M. Rationality vs ignorance: The role of MNE headquarters in subsidiaries' innovation processes. Journal of International Business Studies 2011, 42:1-13.
28. Conklin D.W. The global environment of business: New paradigms for international management 2011, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
29. De Jong G., Phan B., van Ees H. Does the meta-environment determine firm performance? Theory and evidence from European enterprises. International Business Review 2011, 20:454-465.
30. De Jong G., van Houten J. The impact of MNE cultural diversity on the internationalization-performance relationship. Theory and evidence from European multinational enterprises. International Business Review 2014, 23:313-326.
31. Dikova D. Performance of foreign subsidiaries: Does psychic distance matter?. International Business Review 2009, 18:38-49.
32. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:147-160.
33. Dörrenbächer C., Gammelgaard J. Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro political headquarters-subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries. Journal of International Management 2006, 12:266-283.
34. Dörrenbacher C., Geppert M. Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management 2006, 12:251-265.
35. Dow D., Karunaratna A. Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies 2006, 37:578-602.
36. Dow D., Larimo J. Disentangling the roles of international experience and distance in establishment mode choice. Management International Review 2011, 51:321-355.
37. Driffield N., Jindra B. Challenging the production function approach to assess the developmental effects of FDI. European Journal of Development Research 2012, 24:32-37.
38. Drogendijk R., Martín Martín O. Relevant dimensions and contextual weights of distance in international business decisions: Evidence from Spanish and Chinese outward FDI. International Business Review 2015, 24:133-147.
39. Drogendijk R., Slangen A. Hofstede, Schwarz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. International Business Review 2006, 15:361-380.
40. Drogendijk R., Zander L. Walking the cultural distance: In search of direction beyond friction. Advances in International Management 2010, 23:189-212.
41. Earley P.C. Leading cultural research in the future: A matter of paradigms and taste. Journal of International Business Studies 2006, 37:922-931.
42. Eisenhardt K.M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14:57-74.
43. Ellis P.D. Does psychic distance moderate the market size-entry sequence relationship?. Journal of International Business Studies 2008, 39:351-369.
44. Evans J., Mavondo F.T. Psychic distance and organizational performance: An empirical examination of international retailing operations. Journal of International Business Studies 2002, 33:515-532.
45. Evans J., Mavondo F.T., Bridson K. Psychic distance: Antecedents, retail strategy implications and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing 2008, 16:32-63.
46. Evans J., Treadgold A., Mavondo F. Explaining export development through psychic distance. International Market Review 2000, 17:164-168.
47. Fenton-O'Creevy M., Gooderham P., Nordhaug O. Human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia: Centralization or autonomy?. Journal of International Business Studies 2008, 39:151-166.
48. Filatotchev I., Stephan J., Jindra B. Ownership structure, strategic controls and export intensity of foreign invested firms in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies 2008, 39:1133-1148.
49. Forsgren M. Theories of multinational firm: A multinational creature in the global economy 2008, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA.
50. Frost T., Birkinshaw J., Ensign P. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23:997-1018.
51. Gammelgaard J., McDonald F., Stephan A., Tüselmann H., Dörrenbächer C. The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance. International Business Review 2012, 21:1158-1172.
52. Gammelgaard J., McDonald F., Stephan A., Tüselmann H., Dörrenbächer C. Characteristics of low-autonomy foreign subsidiaries: Value-chains, staffing, and intra-organizational relationships. Journal of International Business and Economy 2012, 13:65-95.
53. Garnier G.H. Context and decision-making autonomy in the foreign affiliates of US multinational corporations. Academy of Management Journal 1982, 25:893-908.
54. Gates S.R., Egelhoff W.G. Centralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships. Journal of International Business Studies 1986, 17:71-92.
55. Gaur A.S., Lu J.W. Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management 2007, 33:84-110.
56. Geppert M., Williams K. Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: Towards a socio-political framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2006, 17:49-69.
57. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 2005, 12:78-104.
58. Goerzen A., Rasmussen C.G., Nielsen B.B. Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy. Journal of International Business Studies 2013, 44:427-450.
59. Gomez-Mejia L.R., Balkin D.B. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal 1992, 35:921-955.
60. Gregersen H.B., Hite J.M. Expatriate performance appraisal in U.S. multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies 1996, 27:711-738.
61. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate data analysis 2006, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 6th ed.
62. Håkanson L., Ambos B. The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management 2011, 16:195-210.
63. Hofstede G.H. Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations 2001, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
64. Hoskinsson R.E., Eden L., Lau C.-M., Wright M. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal 2000, 43:249-267.
65. House R.J., Hanges P.J., Javidan M., Dorfman P.W., Gupta V. Leadership, culture, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
66. Hymer S. The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment 1976, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
67. IWH The IWH FDI micro database. A methodological note on the 2011 survey 2011, Institute for Economic Research (IWH), Halle/Saale (DE).
68. Jindra B., Giroud A., Scott-Kennel J. Subsidiary roles, vertical links and economic development: Lessons from transition economies. Journal of World Business 2009, 44:167-179.
69. Johanson J., Vahlne J. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies 1977, 8:23-32.
70. Johanson J., Wiedersheim-Paul F. The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies 1975, 12:305-322.
71. Johnston S. Headquarters and subsidiaries in multinational corporations: Strategies, tasks and coordination 2005, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
72. Johnston S., Menguc B. Subsidiary and the level of subsidiary autonomy in the multinational corporation: A quadratic model investigation of Australian subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies 2007, 38:787-801.
73. Kirkman B.L., Lowe K.B., Gibson C.B. A quarter century of 'culture's consequences': A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies 2006, 37:285-320.
74. Kogut B., Singh H. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies 1988, 19:411-432.
75. Luo Y. Autonomy of foreign R&D units in an emerging market: An information processing perspective. Management International Review 2006, 46:349-378.
76. Maennik K., Varblane U., Hannula H. The role of country, industry and firm specific effects on the autonomy of multinational corporation's subsidiary in Central and East European countries. Journal of Economics and Business 2005, 8:101-122.
77. Meyer K.E., Peng M.W. Probing theoretically into CEE: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies 2005, 36:600-621.
78. Nakos G., Brouthers K.D. Entry mode choice of SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2002, 44:47-63.
79. Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M.H. Applied linear statistical models 1985, Irwin, Homewood, IL, USA.
80. Nohria N., Ghoshal S. Differentiated fit and shared values. Strategic Management Journal 1994, 15:491-502.
81. Nordstrom K.A., Vahlne J.-E. Is the globe shrinking? Psychic distance and the establishment of Swedish sales subsidiaries during the last 100 years. International trade: Regional and global issues 1994, 41-56. St. Martin's Press, New York, NY. M. Landeck (Ed.).
82. North D.C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
83. O'Donnell S.W. Managing foreign subsidiaries: Agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21:525-548.
84. O'Grady S., Lane H.W. The psychic distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies 1996, 10:309-330.
85. Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal 1997, 18:697-712.
86. Paterson S.L., Brock D.M. The development of subsidiary management research: Review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review 2002, 11:139-163.
87. Peng M. Business strategies in transition economies 2000, Sage, London.
88. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:879-903.
89. Prahalad C.K., Doz Y.L. The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision 1987, Free Press, New York.
90. Prime N., Obadia C., Vida I. Psychic distance in exporter-importer relationships: A grounded theory approach. International Business Review 2009, 18:184-198.
91. Rabbiosi L. Subsidiary roles and reverse knowledge transfer: An investigation of the effects of coordination mechanisms. Journal of International Management 2011, 17:97-113.
92. Roth K., Morrison A.J. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies 1992, 23:715-735.
93. Roth K., O'Donnell S. Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39:678-703.
94. Rugman A.M., Oh C.H. Does the regional nature of multinationals affect the multinationality and performance relationship?. International Business Review 2010, 19:479-488.
95. Schüler-Zhou Y., Schüller M. An empirical study of Chinese subsidiaries' decision-making autonomy in Germany. Asia Business and Management 2013, 13:1-30.
96. Shenkar O. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies 2001, 32:519-535.
97. Shenkar O. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies 2012, 43:1-11.
98. Shenkar O. Beyond cultural distance: Switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies 2012, 43:12-17.
99. Siemsen E., Roth A., Oliveira P. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods 2010, 13:1-21.
100. Simões V.C., Biscaya R., Nevado P. Subsidiary decision-making autonomy: Competences, integration and local responsiveness. Network knowledge in international business 2002, 137-166. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK). S.M. Lundan (Ed.).
101. Slangen A.H.L., Beugelsdijk S. The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency approach. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41:980-995.
102. Smith M., Dowling P.J., Rose E.L. Psychic distance revisited: A proposed conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Management & Organization 2011, 17:123-143.
103. Sousa C.M.P., Bradley F. Cultural distance and psychic distance: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Marketing Management 2008, 24:467-488.
104. Stigler G.J. The economics of information. The Journal of Political Economy 1961, 69:213-225.
105. Stottinger B., Schlegelmilch B.B. Explaining export development through psychic distance: Enlightening or elusive?. International Marketing Review 1998, 15:357-372.
106. Taggart J.H., Hood N. Determinants of autonomy in multinational corporation subsidiaries. European Management Journal 1999, 17:226-236.
107. Tung R.L., Verbeke A. Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41:1259-1274.
108. Vachani S. Global diversification's effect on multinational subsidiaries' autonomy. International Business Review 1999, 8:535-560.
109. Verbeke A. International acquisition success: Social community and dominant logic. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41:38-46.
110. Verbeke A., Chrisman J.J., Yuan W. A note on strategic renewal and corporate venturing in the subsidiaries of multinational enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2007, 48:585-600.
111. White R., Pointer T. Strategies for foreign owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly 1984, 48:59-69.
112. Whitelock J., Jobber D. An evaluation of external factors in the decision of UK industrial firms to enter a new non-domestic market: An exploratory study. European Journal of Marketing 2004, 38:1437-1455.
113. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data 2002, MIT Press, Boston.
114. Young S., Tavares A.T. Centralization and autonomy: Back to the future. International Business Review 2004, 13:215-237.
115. Zaheer S. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38:341-363.