Human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia: Centralisation or autonomy?

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 151-166

  Fenton O'Creevy, Mark ^a,c   Gooderham, Paul ^b   Nordhaug, Odd ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centralised control; International HRM; Multinationals; Neo institutional theory; Strategic context; Subsidiary management

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049119817     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400313     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Albert, M. 1991. Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
2. Allison, P. 2001. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Almond, P., Edwards, T., Colling, T., Ferner, A., Gunnigle, P., Muller-Camen, M., Quintanilla, J., & Wächter, H. 2005. Unravelling home and host country effects: An investigation of the HR policies of an American multinational in four European countries. Industrial Relations, 44(2): 276-306.
4. Barry, M., & Wailes, N. 2004. Contrasting systems? 100 years of arbitration in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(4): 430-447.
5. Bartlett, C. A. 1986. Building and managing the transnational: The new organizational challenge. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries: 367-401. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Bévort, F., Pedersen, J. S., & Sundbo, J. 1995. Denmark. In I. Brunstein (Ed.), Human resource management in Western Europe: 31-58. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
8. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.
9. Brewster, C., Hegewisch, A., Mayne, L., & Tregaskis, O. 1994. Methodology of the Price Waterhouse Cranfield Project. In C. Brewster and A. Hegewisch (Eds), Policy and practice in European human resource management: 230-245. London: Routledge.
10. Brewster, C., Tregaskis, O., Hegewisch, A., & Mayne, L. 1996. Comparative research in human resource management: A review and an example. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(4): 585-604.
11. Child, J. 2000. Theorizing about organizations cross-nationally. In J. L. C. Cheng and R. B. Peterson (Eds), Advances in international comparative management, Vol. 13, 27-75. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Child, J., Faulkner, D., & Pitkethly, R. 2001. The management of international acquisitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Croucher, R., Gooderham, P. N., & Parry, E. 2006. The influences on direct communication in British and Danish firms: Country, 'strategic HRM' or unionization? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(3): 267-286.
14. Dell'Aringa, C., & Lodovici, M. 1992. Industrial relations and economic performance. In T. Treu (Ed.), Participation in public policy making: The role of trade unions and employers' associations: 26-58. Berlin: De Gruyter.
15. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160.
16. Edwards, P., Hall, M., Hyman, R., Marginson, P., Sisson, K., Waddington, J., & Winchester, D. 1992. Great Britain: Still muddling through. In A. Ferner and R. Hyman (Eds), Industrial relations in the new Europe: 1-68. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Fenton-O'Creevy, M. P., & Wood, S. J. 2007. Diffusion of human resource management systems in UK headquartered multinational enterprises: Integrating institutional and strategic choice explanations. European Journal of International Management, 1(4) (forthcoming).
18. Ferner, A. 1997. Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resource Management Journal, 7(1): 19-37.
19. Ferner, A., Almond, P., Clark, I., Colling, T., Edwards, T., Holden, L., & Muller-Camen, M. 2004. Dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources: Case-study evidence from US MNCs in the UK. Organization Studies, 25(3): 363-391.
20. Foss, N. 1999. The challenge of business systems and the challenge to business systems. International Journal of Management and Organization, 29(2): 9-24.
21. French, S. 2001. Works councils in unified Germany: Still loyal to the trade unions? International Journal of Manpower, 22(6): 560-578.
22. Gamier, G. H. 1982. Context and decision-making autonomy in the foreign affiliates of US multinational corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4): 693-908.
23. Geppert, M., Matten, D., & Williams, K. 2002. Introduction. In M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 1-16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Geppert, M., Williams, K., & Mattern, D. 2003. The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3): 617-641.
25. Giardini, A., Kabst, R., & Müller-Camen, M. 2005. HRM in the German business system. Management Revue, 16(1): 63-80.
26. Gooderham, P. N., & Nordhaug, O. 1997. Flexibility in Norwegian and UK firms: Competitive pressures and institutional embeddedness. Employment Relations, 19(6): 568-580.
27. Gooderham, P. N., Nordhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. 1999. Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4): 507-531.
28. Gunnigle, P., MacCurtain, S., & Morley, M. 2001. Why Ireland? A qualitative review of the factors influencing the location of US multinationals in Ireland with particular reference to the impact of labour issues. Economic and Social Review, 32(1): 43-67.
29. Gunnigle, P., Morley, M., & Turner, T. 1997. Challenging collectivist traditions: Individualism and the management of industrial relations in greenfield sites. Economic and Social Review, 28(1): 105-134.
30. Gunnigle, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Kinsella, M. 2002. Organised labour in the new economy: Trade unions and public policy in the Republic of Ireland. In D. D'Art and T. Turner (Eds), Irish employment relations in the new economy: 222-258. Dublin: Blackhall Press.
31. Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. 2004. Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy, MPIfG Discussion paper 04/5. Berlin: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
32. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds) 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Hamill, J. 1984. Labour relations decision making within multinational corporations. Industrial Relations Journal, 15(2): 30-34.
34. Harzing, A. W. 2000. An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (1): 101-120.
35. Harzing, A.-W., & Sorge, A. 2003. The relative impact of country of origin and universal contingencies on internationalization strategies and corporate control in multinational enterprises: Worldwide and European perspectives. Organization Studies, 24(2): 187-214.
36. Harzing, A. -W., Sorge, A., & Paauwe, J. 2002. Headquarters- subsidiary relationships in multinational companies: A British-German comparison. In M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 96-118. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Hassel, A. 1999. The erosion of the German system of industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(3): 483-505.
38. Hitt, M., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. 2004. The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15(2): 173-185.
39. Hollingsworth, J. R. 1997. Continuities and changes in social systems of production: The cases of Japan, Germany, and the United States. In J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (Eds), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions: 260-282. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Hollingsworth, J. R. 2003. Advancing the socio-economic paradigm with institutional analysis. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1): 130-134.
41. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. (Eds) 1997. Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Kihn, L. A. 2001. Strategies, decentralization, and controls in internationalized Finnish firms. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 1(1): 35-57.
43. King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. 2001. Analysing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1): 49-69.
44. Klikauer, T. 2002. Stability in Germany's industrial relations: A critique on Hassel's erosion thesis. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(2): 295-308.
45. Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308-324.
46. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215-233.
47. Kristensen, P. H. 1992. Strategies against structures: Institutions and economic organizations in Denmark. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: 117-136. London: Sage.
48. Lane, C. 1992. European business systems: Britain and Germany compared. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: 64-97. London: Sage.
49. Long, J. S. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Lovelock, C. H., & Yip, G. S. 1996. Developing global strategies for service business. California Management Review, 38(2): 64-86.
51. Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. 1991. Coordination demands of international strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3): 429-444.
52. Mayer, M., & Whittington, R. 2002. For boundedness in the study of comparative and international business: The case of the diversified multidivisional corporation. In M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context 19-41. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
53. Myloni, B., Harzing, A. W. K., & Mirza, H. 2004. Host country specific factors and the transfer of human resource management practices in multinational companies. International Journal of Manpower, 25(6): 518-534.
54. Noorderhaven, N. G., & Harzing, A. W. K. 2003. The 'country-of-origin effect' in multinational corporations: Sources, mechanisms, and moderating conditions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(2): 47-66.
55. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145-179.
56. Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 697-713.
57. Ortiz, L. 1998. Union response to teamwork: the case of Opel Spain. Industrial Relations Journal, 29(1): 42-57.
58. Peng, M. W., Lee, S. -H., & Wang, D. Y. L. 2005. What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 622-633.
59. Redding, G. 2005. The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 113-155.
60. Rosenzweig, P. M., & Nohria, N. 1994. Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 229-251.
61. Roth, K. 1992. Implementing international strategy at the business unit level: The role of managerial decision-making characteristics. Journal of Management, 18(4): 769-789.
62. Royle, T. 2002. Resistance is useless! The problems of trade union organizations in the European fast-food industry: The Case of McDonald's, in M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 189-214. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
63. Rubery, J., & Wilkinson, F. 1994. Employer strategy and the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Scholz, C. 1996. Human resource management in Germany, in T. Clark (Ed.), European human resource management: 118-155. Oxford: Blackwell.
65. Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Singe, I., & Croucher, R. 2005. US multinationals and the German industrial relations system. Management Revue, 16(1): 123-137.
67. Sorge, A. 1995. Cross-national differences in personnel and organization. In A. W. Harzing and J. van Ruysseveldt (Eds), International human resource management: An integrated approach: 99-123. London: Sage.
68. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. 2005. Introduction. In W. Streeck and K. Thelen (Eds), Beyond continuity. 1-39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Taggart, J. H., & Hood, N. 1999. Determinants of autonomy in multinational corporation subsidiaries. European Management Journal, 17(2): 226-236.
70. Tempel, A. 2002. Multinational companies, institutional environments and the diffusion of industrial relations practices. in M. Geppert, D. Matten and K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for European management in a global context: 143-164. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
71. Wächter, H., & Müller-Camen, M. 2002. Co-determination and strategic integration in German firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(3): 76-87.
72. Wächter, H., & Stengelhofen, T. 1995. Germany. In I. Brunstein (Ed.), Human resource management in western Europe: 89-112. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
73. Westney, D. E. 1993. Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghoshal and D. E. Westney (Eds), Organization theory and the multinational corporation: 53-76. New York: St Martin's Press.
74. Wever, K. S. 1994. Learning from works councils: Five unspectacular case studies from Germany. Industrial Relations, 33(4):467-481.
75. Whitley, R. 1992. Societies, firms and markets: The social structuring of business systems. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: Firms and markets in their national contexts: 5-45. London: Sage.
76. Whitley, R. 1997. The social construction of economic actors. In R. Whitley and P. H. Kristensen (Eds), The changing European firm: 39-66. London: Routledge.
77. Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 608-618.
78. Young, S., & Tavares, A. T. 2004. Centralization and autonomy: Back to the future. International Business Review, 13(2): 215-235.
79. Young, S., Hood, N., & Hamill, J. 1985. Decision-making in foreign-owned multinational subsidiaries in the United Kingdom. Geneva: International Labour Office.