Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 58, Issue , 2015, Pages 73-92

  Wang, Meng ^a,b   Hoogendoorn, Serge P ^a   Daamen, Winnie ^a   van Arem, Bart ^a   Happee, Riender ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Car following; Connected vehicles; Dynamic game theory; Lane changing; Receding horizon control

Indexed keywords

CONTROL THEORY; COST FUNCTIONS; GAME THEORY; ITERATIVE METHODS; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEMS; CAR FOLLOWING; CONTROLLER PERFORMANCE; DYNAMIC GAME THEORIES; LANE CHANGING; LANE CHANGING MANOEUVRES; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; RECEDING HORIZON CONTROL;

CONTROLLERS;

AUTOMOBILE; CONTROL SYSTEM; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; GAME THEORY; PREDICTION;

EID: 84937805001     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aghabayk K., Moridpour S., Young W., Sarvi M., Wang Y. Comparing heavy vehicle and passenger car lane-changing maneuvers on arterial roads and freeways. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2011, 2260:94-101.
2. Basar T., Olsder G.J. Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory 1995, vol. 200. Academic Press, London.
3. Falcone P., Borrelli F., Asgari J., Tseng H.E., Hrovat D. Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2007, 15(3):566-580.
4. Ge J.I., Orosz G. Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2014, 46:46-64.
5. Hatipoglu C., Ozguner U., Redmill K. Automated lane change controller design. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2003, 4:13-22.
6. Hasebe K., Nakayama A., Sugiyama Y. Dynamical model of a cooperative driving system for freeway traffic. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 68(2):026102/1-026102/6.
7. Hoogendoorn S.P., Hoogendoorn R., Wang M., Daamen W. Modeling driver, driver support, and cooperative systems with dynamic optimal control. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2012, 2316:20-30.
8. Hussein, A., Mostafa, H., Badrel-Din, M., Sultan, O., Khamis, A., 2012. Meta-heuristic optimization approach to mobile robot path planning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET).
9. Katzourakis D., de Winter J.C., de Groot S., Happee R. Driving simulator parameterization using double-lane change steering metrics as recorded on five modern cars. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2012, 26:96-112.
10. Kesting A., Treiber M., Schonhof M., Helbing D. Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2008, 16(6):668-683.
11. Kesting A., Treiber M., Helbing D. General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2007, 1999:86-94.
12. Kita H., Tanimoto K., Fukuyama K. A game theoretical analysis of merging-giveway interaction: a joint estimation model. Transportation and Traffic Theory in the 21st Century, Adelaide, Australia 2002, 503-518. Springer Science.
13. Laval J.A., Leclercq L. Microscopic modeling of the relaxation phenomenon using a macroscopic lane-changing model. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2008, 42(6):511-522.
14. Liu, H.X., Wu, X., Adam, Z., Ban, J., 2007. A game theoretical approach for modelling merging and yielding behaviour at freeway on-ramp sections. In: 17th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, London, UK. pp. 197-211.
15. Luders, B.D., Karaman, S., How, J.P., 2013. Robust sampling-based motion planning with asymptotic optimality guarantees. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference (GNC).
16. Marczak F., Daamen W., Buisson C. Merging behaviour: empirical comparison between two sites and new theory development. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2013, 36(0):530-546.
17. Marsden G., McDonald M., Brackstone M. Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2001, 9(1):33-51.
18. Mayne D.Q., Rawlings J.B., Rao C.V., Scokaert P.O.M. Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica 2000, 36(6):789-814.
19. Monteil J., Billot R., Sau J., Armetta F., Hassas S., El Faouzi N.-E. Cooperative highway traffic. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2013, 2391:1-10.
20. Morari M., Lee J.H. Model predictive control: past, present and future. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1999, 23(4-5):667-682.
21. Pontryagin L.S., Boltyanskii V.G., Gamkrelidze R.V., Mishchenko E.F. The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes 1962, CRC Press.
22. Rajamani R. Vehicle Dynamics and Control 2011, Springer.
23. Rawlings J.B., Muske K.R. The stability of constrained receding horizon control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1993, 38(10):1512-1516.
24. Sarvi M., Kuwahara M., Ceder A. Freeway ramp merging phenomena in congested traffic using simulation combined with a driving simulator. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2004, 19(5):351-363.
25. Shimoda S., Kuroda Y., Iagnemma K. High-speed navigation of unmanned ground vehicles on uneven terrain using potential fields. Robotica 2007, 25:409-424.
26. Shladover S.E., Su D., Lu X.-Y. Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2012, 2324:63-70.
27. Soudbakhsh D., Eskandarian A., Chichka D. Vehicle collision avoidance maneuvers with limited lateral acceleration using optimal trajectory control. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 2013, 135:041006.
28. Toledo T., Zohar D. Modeling duration of lane changes. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2007, 1999:71-78. 10.3141/1999-08.
29. Toledo T., Koutsopoulos H.N., Ben-Akiva M. Integrated driving behavior modeling. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2007, 15(2):96-112.
30. Treiber M., Hennecke A., Helbing D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62(2):1805-1824.
31. Van Arem B., van Driel C.J.G., Visser R. The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2006, 7(4):429-436.
32. VanderWerf J., Shladover S.E., Miller M., Kourjanskaia N. Effects of adaptive cruise control systems on highway traffic flow capacity. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2002, 1800:78-84.
33. Varaiya, P., Shladover, S.E., 1991. Sketch of an IVHS systems architecture. In: Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, vol. 2, pp. 909-922.
34. Wang, M., 2014. Generic Model Predictive Control Framework for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. Ph.D.Thesis. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
35. Wang, M., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S.P., van Arem, B., 2012. Driver assistance systems modeling by model predictive control. In: 15th IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1543-1548.
36. Wang M., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S.P., van Arem B. Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part I: mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2014, 40(0):271-289.
37. Wang M., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S.P., van Arem B. Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part II: cooperative sensing and cooperative control. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2014, 40(0):290-311.
38. Wang M., Treiber M., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S.P., van Arem B. Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle: framework and model characteristics. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2013, 36(0):547-563.
39. Xu G., Liu L., Ou Y., Song Z. Dynamic modeling of driver control strategy of lane-change behavior and trajectory planning for collision prediction. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2012, 13:1138-1155.
40. Yoshida H., Shinohara S., Nagai M. Lane change steering manoeuvre using model predictive control theory. Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 2008, 46:669-681.
41. Zheng Z. Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2014, 60:16-32.