Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 46, Issue , 2014, Pages 46-64

  Ge, Jin I ^a   Orosz, Gábor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceleration feedback; Connected cruise control (CCC); DSRC; Head to tail string stability; Robustness; Time delay

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; DELAY CONTROL SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); TIME DELAY; VEHICLE TO VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS; VEHICLES;

ACCELERATION FEEDBACK; ACCELERATION SIGNALS; CONNECTED CRUISE CONTROL (CCC); CONNECTIVITY STRUCTURES; DSRC; ROBUST PERFORMANCE; STRING STABILITY; VEHICLE PLATOONS;

CRUISE CONTROL;

ACCELERATION; CONNECTIVITY; CONTROL SYSTEM; MOBILITY; TRANSPORT VEHICLE; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84901592910     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Avedisov S.S., Orosz G. Nonlinear network modes of circulant systems with applications to connected vehicles. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2014, submitted.
2. Aw A., Rascle M. Resurrection of second order models of traffic flow?. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 1999, 60(3):916-938.
3. Bai, F., Krishnan, H., 2006. Reliability analysis of DSRC wireless communication for vehicle safety applications. In: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, pp. 355-362.
4. Chan, E., Gilhead, P., Jelinek, P., Krejci, P., Robinson, T., 2012. Cooperative control of SARTRE automated platoon vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress.
5. Daganzo C.F. Requiem for second-order fluid approximations of traffic flow. Trans. Res. Part B: Methodol. 1995, 29(4):277-286.
6. Davis L.C. Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 69(6):066110.
7. Engelborghs, T.K., Samaey, G., 2001. DDE-BIFTOOL v. 2.00: a Matlab package for bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations, Technical Report TW-330, Department of Computer Science, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
8. Ge, J.I., Avedisov, S.S., Orosz, G., 2013. Stability of connected vehicle platoons with delayed acceleration feedback. In: Proceedings of the ASME Dynamical Systems and Control Conference, ASME, p. V003T30A006 (paper no. DSCC2013-4040).
9. Geiger A., Lauer M., Moosmann F., Ranft B., Rapp H., Stiller C., Ziegler J. Team AnnieWAY's entry to the 2011 grand cooperative driving challenge. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2012, 13(3):1008-1017.
10. Insperger T., Stépán G. Semi-Discretization for Time Delay Systems 2011, Springer.
11. Insperger T., Milton J., Stépán G. Acceleration feedback improves balancing against reflex delay. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10(79):20120763.
12. Lidström K., Sjöberg K., Holmberg U., Andersson J., Bergh F., Bjäde M., Mak S. A modular CACC system integration and design. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2012, 13(3):1050-1061.
13. Orosz G. Connected cruise control: modeling, delay effects, and nonlinear behavior. Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 2014, submitted.
14. Orosz, G., Shah, S.P., 2012. A nonlinear modeling framework for autonomous cruise control. In: Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, 2012. DSCC2012. ASME, pp. 467-471.
15. Orosz G., Wilson R.E., Stépán G. Traffic jams: dynamics and control. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2010, 368(1928):4455-4479.
16. Orosz, G., Moehlis, J., Bullo, F., 2011. Delayed car-following dynamics for human and robotic drivers. In: Proceedings of the ASME IDETC/CIE Conference, ASME, pp. 529-538 (paper no. DETC2011-48829).
17. Qin, W.B., Orosz, G., 2013. Digital effects and delays in connected vehicles: linear stability and simulations. In: Proceedings of the ASME Dynamical Systems and Control Conference, ASME, p. V003T30A001 (paper no. DSCC2013-3830).
18. Qin, W.B. Gomez, M.M., Orosz, G., 2014. Stability analysis of connected cruise control with stochastic delay. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference.
19. Rajamani R., Shladover S. An experimental comparative study of autonomous and co-operative vehicle-follower control systems. Trans. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 2001, 9(1):15-31.
20. Schrank, D., Eisele, B., Lomax, T., 2012. Annual Urban Mobility Report, Progressreport 70, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
21. Seiler P., Pant A., Hedrick K. Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 2004, 49(10):1835-1842.
22. van Arem B., van Driel C., Visser R. The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans. Intell. Trans. Syst. 2006, 7(4):429-436.
23. van Nunen E., Kwakkernaat R., Ploeg J., Netten B. Cooperative competition for future mobility. IEEE Trans. Intell. Trans. Syst. 2012, 13(3):1018-1025.
24. Wang M., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S.P., van Arem B. Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. part I: mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems. Trans. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 2014, 40:271-289.
25. Wang M., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S.P., van Arem B. Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. part II: cooperative sensing and cooperative control. Trans. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 2014, 40:290-311.
26. Zhang L., Orosz G. Motif-based analysis of connected vehicle systems: delay effects and stability. Automatica 2014, submitted.
27. Zhang, L., Orosz, G., 2013. Designing network motifs in connected vehicle systems: delay effects and stability. In: Proceedings of the ASME Dynamical Systems and Control Conference, ASME, p. V003T42A006 (paper no. DSCC2013-4081).