Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle: Framework and model characteristics

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 36, Issue , 2013, Pages 547-563

  Wang, Meng ^a   Treiber, Martin ^b   Daamen, Winnie ^a   Hoogendoorn, Serge P ^a   van Arem, Bart ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems; Car following; Cooperative systems; Optimal control; Stability analysis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLERS; COST FUNCTIONS; STABILITY; VEHICLES;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC); CAR FOLLOWING; CO-OPERATIVE SYSTEMS; DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM; OPTIMAL CONTROLS; RECEDING HORIZON CONTROL; STABILITY ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL;

CONTROL SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MODELING; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

EID: 84887189552     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chen H., Allgower F. A quasi-infinite horizon nonlinear model predictive control scheme with guaranteed stability. Automatica 1998, 34(10):1205-1217.
2. Davis L.C. Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on traffic flow. Physical Review E 2004, 69(6):066110.
3. Fleming W.H., Soner H.M. Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions 1993, Springer-Verlag.
4. Godbole D., Kourjanskaia N., Sengupta R., Zandonadi M. Breaking the highway capacity barrier: adaptive cruise control-based concept. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1999, (1679):148-157.
5. Hasebe K., Nakayama A., Sugiyama Y. Dynamical model of a cooperative driving system for freeway traffic. Physical Review E 2003, 68:026102.
6. Helly, W., 1959. Simulation of bottlenecks in single lane traffic flow. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, pp. 207-238.
7. Holland E. A generalised stability criterion for motorway traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1998, 32(2):141-154.
8. Hoogendoorn S.P., Bovy P.H.L. Generic driving behavior modeling by differential game theory. Traffic and Granular Flow' 07 2009, 321-331. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
9. Ioannou P.A., Chien C.C. Autonomous intelligent cruise control. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 1993, 42(4):657-672.
10. Kesting A., Treiber M., Schonhof M., Helbing D. Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2008, 16(6):668-683.
11. Lighthill M.J. Group velocity. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 1965, 1(1):1-28.
12. Marsden G., McDonald M., Brackstone M. Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2001, 9(1):33-51.
13. Minderhoud M., Bovy P.H.L. Impact of intelligent cruise control on motorway capacity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1999, (1679):1-9.
14. Naus G., Vugts R., Ploeg J., van de Molengraft M., Steinbuch M. String-stable CACC design and experimental validation: a frequency-domain approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2010, 59(9):4268-4279.
15. Rao B.S.Y., Varaiya P. Flow benefits of autonomous intelligent cruise control in mixed manual and automated traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1993, 1408:36-43.
16. Swaroop, D., 1994. String stability in Interconnected Systems: An aApplication to a Platoon of Vehicles. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
17. Treiber, M., Kesting, A., 2010. Verkehrsdynamik und -simulation: Daten, Modelle und Anwendungen der Verkehrsflussdynamik. Springer-Lehrbuch. English version http://www.springer.com/physics/complexity/book/978-3-642-32459-8.
18. Treiber M., Kesting A. Evidence of convective instability in congested traffic flow: a systematic empirical and theoretical investigation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2011, 45(9):1362-1377.
19. Treiber M., Hennecke A., Helbing D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Physical Review E 2000, 62(2):1805.
20. van Arem B., van Driel C.J.G., Visser R. The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2006, 7(4):429-436.
21. VanderWerf J., Shladover S., Miller M., Kourjanskaia N. Effects of adaptive cruise control systems on highway traffic flow capacity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2002, 1800:78-84.
22. Varaiya, P., Shladover, S.E., 1991. Sketch of an IVHS systems architecture. In: Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, vol. 2, pp. 909-922.
23. Wang, M., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S.P., van Arem, B., 2013. Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2012.0069.
24. Ward J.A., Wilson R.E. Criteria for convective versus absolute string instability in car-following models. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science. 2011.
25. Williams M. The prometheus programme. IEE Colloquium on Towards Safer Road Transport - Engineering Solutions 1992, 1-3.
26. Wilmink, I.R., Klunder, G.A., van Arem, B., 2007. Traffic flow effects of integrated full-range speed assistance (irsa). In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, pp. 1204-1210.
27. Wilson R.E. Mechanisms for spatio-temporal pattern formation in highway traffic models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2008, 366(1872):2017-2032.
28. Wilson R.E., Ward J.A. Car-following models: fifty years of linear stability analysis - a mathematical perspective. Transportation Planning and Technology 2011, 34(1):3-18.