Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 440-463

  Wolf, Susan M ^a   Branum, Rebecca ^b   Koenig, Barbara A ^c   Petersen, Gloria M ^d   Berry, Susan A ^a,m   Beskow, Laura M ^e,n,o,p   Daly, Mary B ^f   Fernandez, Conrad V ^g   Green, Robert C ^h   Leroy, Bonnie S ^a   Lindor, Noralane M ^i,q,r   O'Rourke, P Pearl ^j,s   Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki ^d,t   Rothstein, Mark A ^k   Van Ness, Brian ^a   Wilfond, Benjamin S ^l,u,v,w  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Uni of Minnesota's   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^e DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^g DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^j PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^k University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^l SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^m AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS   (United States)

ⁿ IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^o BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^r WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^s YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^t STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^u Division of Bioethics   (United States)

^v The Institute of Human Genetics ^*  (United States)

^w UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHILD; ETHICS; FAMILY; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

ADULT; CHILD; DISCLOSURE; FAMILY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84937591383     PISSN: 10731105     EISSN: 1748720X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12288     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. S. M. Wolf et al., "Managing Incidental Findings and Research Results in Genomic Research Involving Biobanks and Archived Data Sets, " Genetics in Medicine 14, no. 4 (2012)
2. R. R. Fabsitz, "Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants," Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics 3, no. 6 (2010): 574-580
3. S. M. Wolf, "Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations," Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 2 (2008): 219-248.
4. L. Battistuzzi et al., "Communication of Clinically Useful NGS Results to At-Risk Relatives of Deceased Research Participants: Toward Active Disclosure?" Journal of Clinical Oncology 31, no. 32 (2013): 4164-4165;
5. M. P. Lolkema et al., "Ethical, Legal, and Counseling Challenges Surrounding the Return of Genetic Results in Oncology, " Journal of Clinical Oncology 31, no. 15 (2013): 1842-1848
6. Y. Bombard, K. Offit, and M. E. Robson, "Risks to Relatives in Genomic Research: A Duty to Warn?" American Journal of Bioethics 12, no. 10 (2012); 12-14.
7. A. L. Bredenoord and J. J. M. van Delden, "Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy, " American Journal of Bioethics 12, no. 10 (2012): 12-14.
8. B. Chan et al., "Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives, " American Journal of Bioethics 12, no. 10 (2012): 1-8;
9. S. M. Fullerton et al., "Beneficence, Clinical Urgency, and the Return of Individual Research Results to Relatives, " American Journal of Bioethics 12, no. 10 (2012): 9-10.
10. Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research, National Cancer Institute, NCI Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources (2011), available at
11. National Cancer Institute, Cancer Genetics Risk and Counseling Physician Data Query: The Option of Genetic Testing (2014), available at (last visited September 1, 2015)
12. L. E. Forrest et al., "Communicating Genetic Information in Families: A Review of Guidelines and Position Papers, " European Journal of Human Genetics 15, no. 6 (2007): 612-618;
13. American Society of Clinical Oncology, "American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility, " Journal of Clinical Oncology 21, no. 12 (2003): 2397-2406
14. E. W. Clayton, "What Should the Law Say About Disclosure of Genetic Information to Relatives?" Journal of Health Care Law & Policy 1, no. 2 (1998): 373-390.
15. K. Offit et al., "The 'Duty to Warn' a Patient's Family Members about Hereditary Disease Risks, " JAMA 292, no. 12 (2004): 1469-1473.
16. American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure, "Professional Disclosure of Familial Genetic Information, " American Journal of Human Genetics 62, no. 2 (1998): 474-483.
17. L. B. Andrews et al., eds., Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks, Institute of Medicine (IOM), Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 1993): at 278.
18. W. Burke, B. J. Evans, and G. P. Jarvik, "Return of Results: Ethical and Legal Distinctions between Research and Clinical Care, " American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 166, no. 1 (2014): 105-111
19. H. S. Richardson, Moral Entanglements: The Ancillary-Care Obligations of Medical Researchers (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012)
20. J. R. Garrett, "Ethical Considerations for Biobanking: Should Individual Research Results Be Shared with Relatives?" Future Medicine 9, no. 2 (2012): 159-162.
21. M. J. Bledsoe et al., "Practical Implementation Issues and Challenges for Biobanks in the Return of Individual Research Results, " Genetics in Medicine 14, no. 4 (2012): 478-483
22. L. M. Beskow and W. Burke, "Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters, " Science Translational Medicine 2, no. 38 (2010): 38cm20.
23. K. D. Graves et al., "Communication of Genetic Test Results to Family and Health-Care Providers Following Disclosure of Research Results, " Genetics in Medicine 16, no. 4 (2014): 294-301;
24. L. C. Milner et al., "Relationships Matter: Ethical Considerations for Returning Results to Family Members of Deceased Subjects, " American Journal of Bioethics 13, no. 10 (2013): 66-67
25. M. A. Rothstein, "Should Researchers Disclose Results to Descendants?" American Journal of Bioethics 13, no. 10 (2013): 64-65
26. H. A. Taylor and B. S. Wilfond, "The Ethics of Contacting Family Members of a Subject in a Genetic Research Study to Return Results for an Autosomal Dominant Syndrome, " American Journal of Bioethics 13, no. 10 (2013): 61
27. M. A. Rothstein, "Disclosing Decedents' Research Results to Relatives Violates the HIPAA Privacy Rule, " American Journal of Bioethics 12, no. 10 (2012): 16-17
28. A. M. Tassé, "The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants, " Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39, no. 4 (2011): 621-630.
29. C. Radecki Breitkopf et al., "Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Research Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including After Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank, " Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43, no. 3 (2015): 464-475.
30. C. V. Fernandez et al., "Attitudes of Parents Toward the Return of Targeted and Incidental Genomic Research Findings in Children, " Genetics in Medicine 16, no. 8 (2014): 633-640
31. J. M. Bollinger et al., "Public Preferences Regarding the Return of Individual Genetic Research Results: Findings from a Qualitative Focus Group Study, " Genetics in Medicine 14, no. 4 (2012): 451-457
32. T. M. Meulenkamp et al., "Communication of Biobanks' Research Results: What Do (Potential) Participants Want?" American Journal of Medical Genetics 152 Part A, no. 10 (2010): 2482-2492
33. J. Murphy et al., "Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research, " American Journal of Bioethics 8, no. 11 (2008): 36-43
34. Compare N. L. Allen et al., "Biobank Participants' Preferences for Disclosure of Genetic Research Results: Perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity Project, " Mayo Clinic Proceedings 89, no. 6 (2014): 738-746
35. L. M. Amendola et al., "Patients' Choices for Return of Exome Sequencing Results to Relatives in the Event of Their Death, " Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43, no. 3 (2015): 476-485.
36. Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, Conference, "Should We Offer Genomic Results to a Research Participant's Family, Including After Death?" (November 6, 2014), available at (last visited September 1, 2015).
37. Mercy College, HIPAA & Research: What Do I Need to Know? available at (last visited September 1, 2015).
38. Johns Hopkins Medicine, Office of Human Subjects Research - Institutional Review Boards, "HIPAA Questions and Answers Relating to Research, " available at (last visited September 1, 2015).
39. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CLIA Program and HIPAA Privacy Rule; Patients' Access to Test Reports; Final Rule, 79 Federal Register 7290-7316 (2014)
40. B. J. Evans et al., "Regulatory Changes Raise Troubling Questions for Genomic Testing, " Genetics in Medicine 16, no. 11 (2014): 799-803
41. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Health Information Privacy, Personal Representatives, " available at (last visited September 1, 2015)
42. D. McGraw, "Privacy and Health Information Technology, " Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, Supp. 2 (2009): 123-149
43. Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FAQ: Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, May a Health Care Provider Disclose Protected Health Information About an Individual to Another Provider, When Such Information Is Requested for the Treatment of a Family Member of the Individual? available at (last visited September 1, 2015)
44. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Frequently Asked Questions About Family Medical History Information, available at (last visited May 10, 2015)
45. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Preamble to Final HIPAA Privacy Rule (2000)available at (last visited July 17, 2014)
46. M. A. Rothstein, "HIPAA Privacy Rule 2.0, " Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41, no. 2 (2013): 525-528
47. South Carolina Statutes § 38-93-40 (2014). For a compendium of state genetic privacy statutes, see National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), Genome Statute and Legislation Database, available at (last visited September 1, 2015).
48. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Medical Genetics, "Policy Statement: Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children, " Pediatrics 131, no. 3 (2013): 620-622
49. L. F. Ross et al., "Technical Report: Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children, " Genetics in Medicine 15, no. 3 (2013): 234-245
50. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors and American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors, "Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents, " American Journal of Human Genetics 57, no. 5 (1995): 1233-1241 [hereinafter ASHG & ACMG 1995].
51. R. C. Green et al., "ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing, " Genetics in Medicine 15, no. 7 (2013): 565-574
52. E. W. Clayton et al., "Addressing the Ethical Challenges in Genetic Testing and Sequencing of Children, " American Journal of Bioethics 14, no. 3 (2014): 3-9;
53. W. Burke et al., "Recommendations for Returning Genomic Incidental Findings? We Need to Talk!" Genetics in Medicine 15, no. 11 (2013): 854-859;
54. A. M. McGuire et al., "Ethics and Genomic Incidental Findings, " Science 340, no. 6136 (2013): 1047-1048;
55. S. M. Wolf, G. J. Annas, and S. Elias, "Patient Autonomy and Incidental Findings in Clinical Genomics, " Science 340, no. 6136 (2013): 1049-1050.
56. ACMG Board of Directors, "ACMG Policy Statement: Updated Recommendations Regarding Analysis and Reporting of Secondary Findings in Clinical Genome-scale Sequencing, " Genetics in Medicine 17, no. 1 (2015): 68-69 (noting approval by the ACMG Board of Directors in September 2014).
57. P. Madadi, "Ethical Perspectives on Translational Pharmacogenetic Research Involving Children, " Pediatric Drugs 17, no. 1 (2015): 91-95;
58. I. A. Holm et al., "Guidelines for Return of Research Results from Pediatric Genomic Studies: Deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board, " Genetics in Medicine 16, no. 7 (2014): 547-552
59. E. Kleiderman et al., "Returning Incidental Findings from Genetic Research to Children: Views of Parents of Children Affected by Rare Diseases, " Journal of Medical Ethics 40, no. 10 (2014): 691-696;
60. E. T. Bui et al., "Do Participants in Genome Sequencing Studies of Psychiatric Disorders Wish to Be Informed of Their Results? A Survey Study, " PLoS One 9, no. 7 (2014): e101111;
61. C. S. Bennette et al., "Return of Incidental Findings in Genomic Medicine: Measuring What Patients Value: Development of an Instrument to Measure Preferences for Information from Next-Generation Testing (IMPRINT), " Genetics in Medicine 15, no. 11 (2013): 873-881
62. F. M. Facio et al., "Motivators for Participation in a Whole-Genome Sequencing Study: Implications for Translational Genomics Research, " European Journal of Human Genetics 19, no. 12 (2011): 1213-1217
63. J. O'Daniel and S. B. Haga, "Public Perspectives on Returning Genetics and Genomics Research Results, " Public Health Genomics 14, no. 6 (2011): 346-355
64. M. J. Esplen et al., "Colorectal Cancer Survivors Undergoing Genetic Testing for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer: Motivational Factors and Psychosocial Functioning, " Clinical Genetics 72, no. 5 (2007): 394-401
65. J. A. Peters et al., "Unpacking the Blockers: Understanding Perceptions and Social Constraints of Health Communication in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) Susceptibility Families, " Journal of Genetic Counseling 20, no. 5 (2011): 450-464;
66. D. J. MacDonald et al., "Women's Perceptions of the Personal and Family Impact of Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment: Focus Group Findings, " Journal of Genetic Counseling 19, no. 2 (2010): 148-160;
67. N. Hallowell et al., "Communication About Genetic Testing in Families of Male BRCA1/2 Carriers and Non-carriers: Patterns, Priorities and Problems, " Clinical Genetics 67, no. 6 (2005): 492-502;
68. C. Foster et al., "Juggling Roles and Expectations: Dilemmas Faced by Women Talking to Relatives About Cancer and Genetic Testing, " Psychology & Health 19, no. 4 (2004): 439-455;
69. E. Claes et al., "Communication with Close and Distant Relatives in the Context of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Cancer Patients, " American Journal of Medical Genetics 116 Part A, no. 1 (2003): 11-19.
70. E. Ormondroyd et al., "Communicating Genetics Research Results to Families: Problems Arising When the Patient Participant Is Deceased, " Psychooncology 17, no. 8 (2008): 804-811
71. L. M. Koehly et al., "Characteristics of Health Information Gatherers, Disseminators, and Blockers Within Families at Risk of Hereditary Cancer: Implications for Family Health Communication Interventions, " American Journal of Public Health 99, no. 12 (2009): 2203-2209
72. P. Atkinson et al., "Kinscapes, Timescapes, and Genescapes: Families Living with Genetic Risk, " Sociology of Health & Illness 35, no. 8 (2013): 1227-1241.
73. M. A. Rothstein, "GINA, the ADA, and Genetic Discrimination in Employment, " Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 4 (2008): 837-840.
74. J. L. Bevan et al., "Critical Social Theory Approaches to Disclosure of Genomic Incidental Findings, " Nursing Ethics 19, no. 6 (2012): 819-828.
75. R. C. Green, D. Lautenbach, and A. L. McGuire, "GINA, Genetic Discrimination, and Genomic Medicine, " New England Journal of Medicine 372, no. 5 (2015): 397-399.
76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification Rules Under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Other Modifications to the HIPAA Rules, " Federal Register 78 (2013): 5566-5702
77. K. R. Smolensky, "Rights of the Dead, " Hofstra Law Review 37, no. 3 (2009): 763-803;
78. C. Strong, "Ethical and Legal Aspects of Sperm Retrieval after Death or Persistent Vegetative State, " Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 27, no. 4 (1999): 347-358.
79. E. Partridge, "Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect, " Ethics 91, no. 2 (1981): 243-264.
80. H. S. Richardson and L. Belsky, "An Ethical Framework for Thinking about the Clinical Care that Researchers Owe Their Subjects, " Hastings Center Report 34, no. 1 (2004): 25-33.
81. M. J. Bledsoe et al., "Return of Research Results from Genomic Biobanks: Cost Matters, " Genetics in Medicine 15, no. 2 (2013): 103-105
82. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425 (Cal. 1976).
83. S. K. Shah et al., "What Does the Duty to Warn Require?" American Journal of Bioethics 13, no. 10 (2013): 62-63
84. G.P. Jarvik et al., "Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices in Between, " American Journal of Human Genetics 94, no. 6 (2014): 818-826
85. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Anticipate and Communicate: Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts (2013), available at (last visited September 1, 2015)
86. E. W. Clayton and A. L. McGuire, "The Legal Risks of Returning Results of Genomics Research, " Genetics in Medicine 14, no. 4 (2012): 473-477
87. V. Anastasova et al., "Communication of Results and Disclosure of Incidental Findings in Longitudinal Paediatric Research, " Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 24, no. 4 (2013): 389-394
88. Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Does the HIPAA Privacy Rule Allow Parents the Right to See Their Children's Medical Records? available at (last visited September 1, 2015).
89. K. A. Strong et al., "In the Absence of Evidentiary Harm, Existing Societal Norms Regarding Parental Authority Should Prevail, " American Journal of Bioethics 14, no. 3 (2014): 24-26
90. J. S. Berg, M. J. Khoury, and J. P. Evans, "Deploying Whole Genome Sequencing in Clinical Practice and Public Health: Meeting the Challenge One Bin at a Time, " Genetics in Medicine 13, no. 6 (2011): 499-504