Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: Deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 547-552

  Holm, Ingrid A ^a,b   Savage, Sarah K ^a   Green, Robert C ^c,d   Juengst, Eric ^e   McGuire, Amy ^f   Kornetsky, Susan ^a   Brewster, Stephanie J ^a   Joffe, Steven ^g   Taylor, Patrick ^a,b  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c LABORATORY FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^f BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Informed Cohort Oversight Board; Participant preferences; Pediatrics; Return of individual genomic research results

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD SAFETY; COHORT ANALYSIS; FAMILY INTERACTION; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL GENETICS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT HARM; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UNITED STATES; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; HOSPITAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PARENT; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BOSTON; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENETIC TESTING; GENOMICS; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HOSPITALS, PEDIATRIC; HUMANS; PARENTS; PATIENT PREFERENCE;

EID: 84903757291     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.190     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kohane IS, Taylor PL. Multidimensional results reporting to participants in genomic studies: getting it right. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:37cm19.
2. Wolf SM, Crock BN, Van Ness B, et al. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med 2012;14:361-384.
3. Kohane IS, Mandl KD, Taylor PL, Holm IA, Nigrin DJ, Kunkel LM. Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact. Science 2007;316: 836-837.
4. Reilly P When should an investigator share raw data with the subjects? IRB 1980 2 4-5+
5. Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR, et al. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:574-580.
6. National Cancer Institute. Workshop on Release of Research Results to Participants in Biospecimen Studies. Bethesda, MD, 2010.
7. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:565-574.
8. Wolf SM. The past, present, and future of the debate over return of research results and incidental findings. Genet Med 2012;14:355-357.
9. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K. Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med 2008;10:831-839.
10. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K. Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth 2008;8: 36-43.
11. Harris ED, Ziniel SI, Amatruda JG, et al. The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository. Genet Med 2012;14:330-337.
12. Richardson HS, Belsky L. The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects. Hastings Cent Rep 2004;34:25-33.
13. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS. Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:8-17.
14. Rothstein MA. Tiered disclosure options promote the autonomy and well-being of research subjects. Am J Bioeth. 2006;6:20-21; author reply W10-22.
15. Foster MW, Mulvihill JJ, Sharp RR. Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information. Genet Med 2009;11:570-574.
16. Grosse SD, Kalman L, Khoury MJ. Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010;686:115-131.
17. Grosse SD, McBride CM, Evans JP, Khoury MJ. Personal utility and genomic information: look before you leap. Genet Med 2009;11:575-576.
18. Khoury MJ, McBride CM, Schully SD, et al.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop. Genet Med 2009;11:559-567.
19. Holm IA, Taylor PL. The Informed Cohort Oversight Board: from values to architecture. Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 2012;13:669-690.
20. Committee on B. Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2001;107:1451-1455.
21. Ross LF, Ross LF, Saal HM, David KL, Anderson RR; American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genet Med 2013;15:234-245.