Do participants in genome sequencing studies of psychiatric disorders wish to be informed of their results? A survey study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Bui, Elise T ^a   Anderson, Natalie K ^a   Kassem, Layla ^a   McMahon, Francis J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BIPOLAR DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC RISK; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PILOT STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL BELIEF; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; GENETICS; HUMAN GENOME; MENTAL DISEASE; MULTICENTER STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PILOT PROJECTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84903733410     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101111     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. McGuire AL, Robinson JO, Ramoni RB, Morley DS, Joffe S, et al. (2012) Returning genetic research results: study type matters. Personalized Medicine 10: 27-34.
2. Beskow LM, Burke W (2010) Offering individual genetic research results: context matters. Sci Transl Med 2: 38cm20.
3. Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Shurin S, Weijer C (2003) Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 25: 704-708. (Pubitemid 37087506)
4. Partridge AH, Winer EP (2002) Informing clinical trial participants about study results. Jama 288: 363-365. (Pubitemid 34761616)
5. Fernandez C (2008) Public expectations for return of results-time to stop being paternalistic? Am J Bioeth 8: 46-48.
6. Caulfield T, McGuire AL, Cho M, Buchanan JA, Burgess MM, et al. (2008) Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biol 6: e73.
7. Christenhusz GM, Devriendt K, Dierickx K (2012) To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts. European journal of human genetics: EJHG.
8. McGuire AL, Caulfield T, Cho MK (2008) Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 9: 152-156. (Pubitemid 351147709)
9. Rotimi CN, Marshall PA (2010) Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research. Genome Med 2: 20.
10. Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR, Puggal M, Beskow LM, et al. (2010) Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 3: 574-580.
11. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, et al. (2013) ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 15: 565-574.
12. Wolf SM, Annas GJ, Elias S (2013) Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics. Science 340: 1049-1050.
13. McGuire AL, Joffe S, Koenig BA, Biesecker BB, McCullough LB, et al. (2013) Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science 340: 1047-1048.
14. Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH, Glass KC, Jarvik GP, et al. (2006) Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet A 140: 1033-1040.
15. Hook CC, DiMagno EP, Tefferi A (2004) Primer on medical genomics. Part XIII: Ethical and regulatory issues. Mayo Clin Proc 79: 645-650. (Pubitemid 38580171)
16. Townsend A, Rousseau F, Friedman J, Adam S, Lohn Z, et al. (2014) Autonomy and the patient's right 'not to know' in clinical whole-genomic sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 22: 6.
17. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (2014) ACMG Updates Recommendation on "Opt Out" for Genome Sequencing Return of Results. Available: http://www.acmg.net/docs/Release-ACMGUpdatesRecommendations-final. pdf.
18. Facio FM, Eidem H, Fisher T, Brooks S, Linn A, et al. (2013) Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study. European journal of human genetics: EJHG 21: 261-265.
19. Tabor HK, Stock J, Brazg T, McMillin MJ, Dent KM, et al. (2012) Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms. Am J Med Genet A 158A: 1310-1319.
20. McGowan ML, Glinka A, Highland J, Asaad G, Sharp RR (2013) Genetics patients' perspectives on clinical genomic testing. Personalized Medicine 10: 339-347.
21. Laegsgaard MM, Kristensen AS, Mors O (2009) Potential consumers' attitudes toward psychiatric genetic research and testing and factors influencing their intentions to test. Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers 13: 57-65.
22. Jones I, Scourfield J, McCandless F, Craddock N (2002) Attitudes towards future testing for bipolar disorder susceptibility genes: a preliminary investigation. Journal of affective disorders 71: 189-193.
23. Christensen KD, Green RC (2013) How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior? Personalized Medicine 10: 377-386.
24. Bollinger JM, Scott J, Dvoskin R, Kaufman D (2012) Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 14: 451-457.
25. Meulenkamp TM, Gevers SK, Bovenberg JA, Koppelman GH, van Hylckama Vlieg A, et al. (2010) Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want? American journal of medical genetics Part A 152A: 2482-2492.
26. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, et al. (2008) Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth 8: 36-43.
27. O'Daniel J, Haga SB (2011) Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results. Public health genomics 14: 346-355.
28. Karlawish J, Roberts S, Chen C, Christensen K, Waterston L, et al. (2013) What is the experience of being an APOE-ε4 homozygote? Findings from the REVEAL Study. Alzheimer's & Dementia 9: P621.
29. Christensen K, Roberts S, Karlawish J, Obisesan T, Waterston L, et al. (2013) The psychological impact of genetic risk information on individuals with mild cognitive impairment at imminent risk for conversion to Alzheimer's disease dementia: Findings from the REVEAL Study. Alzheimer's & Dementia 9: P546.