Return of genomic results to research participants: The floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between

American Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 818-826

  Jarvik, Gail P ^a,b   Amendola, Laura M ^a   Berg, Jonathan S ^c   Brothers, Kyle ^d,e   Clayton, Ellen W ^f   Chung, Wendy ^g   Evans, Barbara J ^h   Evans, James P ^c   Fullerton, Stephanie M ^a   Gallego, Carlos J ^a   Garrison, Nanibaa A ^f   Gray, Stacy W ^i,j   Holm, Ingrid A ^k   Kullo, Iftikhar J ^l   Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani ⁱ   McCarty, Cathy ^m   Prows, Cynthia A ⁿ   Rehm, Heidi L ⁱ   Sharp, Richard R ^l   Salama, Joseph ^a   Sanderson, Saskia ^o   Van Driest, Sara L ^f   Williams, Marc S ^p   Wolf, Susan M ^q   Wolf, Wendy A ^k   Burke, Wylie ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d HUDSONALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^f VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

ⁱ BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^j DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^k BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^l MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^m ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH   (United States)

ⁿ CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^o MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^p GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; CHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONSENSUS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FOLLOW UP; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL GENETICS; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; BUDGET; CHILDHOOD; CONSULTATION; FUNDING; GENE SEQUENCE; HUMAN GENOME; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MORALITY; PARENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN; RESPONSIBILITY; SCIENTIST; SCREENING TEST; STANDARD; THREAT;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DISCLOSURE; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETICS, MEDICAL; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; POPULATION GROUPS; SOCIETIES, SCIENTIFIC;

EID: 84902271056     PISSN: 00029297     EISSN: 15376605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. R.C. Green, J.S. Berg, W.W. Grody, S.S. Kalia, B.R. Korf, C.L. Martin, A.L. McGuire, R.L. Nussbaum, J.M. O'Daniel, and K.E. Ormond et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing Genet. Med. 15 2013 565 574
2. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification Genet. Med. 15 2013 664 666
3. B.B. Biesecker, M. Boehnke, K. Calzone, D.S. Markel, J.E. Garber, F.S. Collins, and B.L. Weber Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer JAMA 269 1993 1970 1974
4. E.B. Bookman, A.A. Langehorne, J.H. Eckfeldt, K.C. Glass, G.P. Jarvik, M. Klag, G. Koski, A. Motulsky, B. Wilfond, T.A. Manolio NHLBI Working Group Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 140 2006 1033 1040
5. R.R. Fabsitz, A. McGuire, R.R. Sharp, M. Puggal, L.M. Beskow, L.G. Biesecker, E. Bookman, W. Burke, E.G. Burchard, G. Church National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group Circ Cardiovasc Genet 3 2010 574 580
6. US Congress (1988). Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988. Public Law 100-578, 102 Stat. 2903; codified as amended at 42 USC § 263a (2006); see regulations at 42 CFR 493.
7. S.M. Wolf, F.P. Lawrenz, C.A. Nelson, J.P. Kahn, M.K. Cho, E.W. Clayton, J.G. Fletcher, M.K. Georgieff, D. Hammerschmidt, and K. Hudson et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations J. Law Med. Ethics 36 2008 219 248 211
8. S.M. Wolf, B.N. Crock, B. Van Ness, F. Lawrenz, J.P. Kahn, L.M. Beskow, M.K. Cho, M.F. Christman, R.C. Green, and R. Hall et al. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets Genet. Med. 14 2012 361 384
9. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2012). Privacy and Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing. Report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Department of Health & Human Services, October 2012. http://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/ PrivacyProgress508.pdf.
10. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2013). Anticipate and Communicate Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts. Report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Department of Health & Human Services, December 2013. http://bioethics.gov/sites/default/ files/FINALAnticipateCommunicate-PCSBI-0.pdf.
11. D.I. Shalowitz, and F.G. Miller Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions PLoS Med. 5 2008 e91
12. S.B. Haga, and J.Q. Zhao Stakeholder views on returning research results Adv. Genet. 84 2013 41 81
13. M.P. Richards, M. Ponder, P. Pharoah, S. Everest, and J. Mackay Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer J. Med. Ethics 29 2003 93 96
14. E. Ormondroyd, C. Moynihan, M. Watson, C. Foster, S. Davolls, A. Ardern-Jones, and R. Eeles Disclosure of genetics research results after the death of the patient participant: a qualitative study of the impact on relatives J. Genet. Couns. 16 2007 527 538
15. D. Wendler, and R. Pentz How does the collection of genetic test results affect research participants? Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 143A 2007 1733 1738
16. W. Burke, A.H. Matheny Antommaria, R. Bennett, J. Botkin, E.W. Clayton, G.E. Henderson, I.A. Holm, G.P. Jarvik, M.J. Khoury, and B.M. Knoppers et al. Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genet. Med. 15 2013 854 859
17. M. Allyse, and M. Michie Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing Trends Biotechnol. 31 2013 439 441
18. N.A. Holtzman ACMG recommendations on incidental findings are flawed scientifically and ethically Genet. Med. 15 2013 750 751
19. L.F. Ross, M.A. Rothstein, and E.W. Clayton Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making JAMA 310 2013 367 368
20. S.M. Wolf, G.J. Annas, and S. Elias Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics Science 340 2013 1049 1050
21. B.J. Evans Minimizing liability risks under the ACMG recommendations for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing Genet. Med. 15 2013 915 920
22. J.S. Berg, L.M. Amendola, C. Eng, E. Van Allen, S.W. Gray, N. Wagle, H.L. Rehm, E.T. DeChene, M.C. Dulik, F.M. Hisama Members of the CSER Actionability and Return of Results Working Group Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Genet. Med. 15 2013 860 867
23. A. Townsend, S. Adam, P.H. Birch, and J.M. Friedman Paternalism and the ACMG recommendations on genomic incidental findings: patients seen but not heard Genet. Med. 15 2013 751 752
24. American College of Medical and Genetics (2014). ACMG Updates Recommendation on "Opt Out" for Genome Sequencing Return of Results. https://www.acmg.net/docs/Release-ACMGUpdatesRecommendations-final.pdf.
25. E.W. Clayton, L.B. McCullough, L.G. Biesecker, S. Joffe, L.F. Ross, S.M. Wolf Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium Pediatrics Working Group Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children Am. J. Bioeth. 14 2014 3 9
26. W. Burke, B.J. Evans, and G.P. Jarvik Return of results: Ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care Am. J. Med. Genet. C. Semin. Med. Genet. 166 2014 105 111
27. L.M. Beskow, and W. Burke Offering individual genetic research results: context matters Sci. Transl. Med. 2 2010 38cm20
28. M.O. Dorschner, L.M. Amendola, E.H. Turner, P.D. Robertson, B.H. Shirts, C.J. Gallego, R.L. Bennett, K.L. Jones, M.J. Tokita, J.T. Bennett National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grand Opportunity Exome Sequencing Project Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93 2013 631 640
29. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57 1995 1233 1241
30. Committee on Bioethics Committee on Genetics American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues Committee Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children Pediatrics 131 2013 620 622
31. L.F. Ross, H.M. Saal, K.L. David, R.R. Anderson American Academy of Pediatrics American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children Genet. Med. 15 2013 234 245
32. B.M. Knoppers, D. Avard, K. Sénécal, M.H. Zawati P3G International Paediatrics Platform Members Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 22 2014 3 5
33. P.J. Neumann, J.T. Cohen, J.K. Hammitt, T.W. Concannon, H.R. Auerbach, C. Fang, and D.M. Kent Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents Health Econ. 21 2012 238 251
34. A. Botoseneanu, J.A. Alexander, and J. Banaszak-Holl To test or not to test? The role of attitudes, knowledge, and religious involvement among U.S. adults on intent-to-obtain adult genetic testing Health Educ. Behav. 38 2011 617 628
35. K.D. Graves, B.N. Peshkin, G. Luta, W. Tuong, and M.D. Schwartz Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing Public Health Genomics 14 2011 178 189
36. L.F. Ross Children, Families, and Health Care Decision-making 1998 Oxford University Press Oxford
37. A. Buchanan, and D. Brock Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making 1989 Cambridge University Press New York
38. J. Goldstein, A. Freud, and A. Solnit Before the Best Interests of the Child Volume II 1979 The Free Press New York
39. B. Evans The First Amendment Right to Speak about the Human Genome University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 16 2014 549 636
40. J.H. Yu, S.M. Jamal, H.K. Tabor, and M.J. Bamshad Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model Genet. Med. 15 2013 684 690
41. I.S. Kohane, K.D. Mandl, P.L. Taylor, I.A. Holm, D.J. Nigrin, and L.M. Kunkel Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact Science 316 2007 836 837