Developing new frontiers in the Rubber Hand Illusion: Design of an open source robotic hand to better understand prosthetics

IEEE RO-MAN 2014 - 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication: Human-Robot Co-Existence: Adaptive Interfaces and Systems for Daily Life, Therapy, Assistance and Socially Engaging Interactions

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 905-910

  De Beir, Albert ^a   Caspar, Emilie ^b   Yernaux, Florence ^a   Magalhaes Da Saldanha Da Gama, Pedro ^b   Vanderborght, Bram ^a   Cleermans, Axel ^b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; PROSTHETICS; ROBOTIC ARMS; ROBOTICS; RUBBER; TESTING; ROBOTS;

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; INNOVATIVE EXPERIMENTS; LOW COSTS; OPEN SOURCES; PROSTHETIC DESIGN; ROBOTIC DEVICES; TESTING METHOD; VALIDATION STUDY; REAL TIME;

SOCIAL ROBOTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84937573945     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926368     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. M. Botvinick, J. Cohen et al., Rubber hands feeltouch that eyes see, Nature, vol. 391, no. 6669, pp. 756-756, 1998.
2. M. Costantini and P. Haggard, The rubber hand illusion: sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership, Consciousness and cognition, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 229-240, 2007.
3. S. Shimada, K. Fukuda, and K. Hiraki, Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback, PloS one, vol. 4, no. 7, 2009.
4. H. H. Ehrsson, B. Rosen, A. Stockselius, C. Ragnö, P. Köhler, and G. Lundborg, Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own, Brain, vol. 131, no. 12, 2008.
5. B. Rosen, H. H. Ehrsson, C. Antfolk, C. Cipriani, F. Sebelius, and G. Lundborg, Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 260-266, 2009.
6. P. Beckerle, O. Christ, J. Wojtusch, J. Schuy, K. Wolff, S. Rinderknecht, J. Vogt, and O. von Stryk, Design and control of a robot for the assessment of psychological factors in prosthetic development, in Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, 2012, pp. 1485-1490.
7. P. Aldhous, Illusion could give prosthetics a sense of touch, New Scientist, vol. 201, no. 2692, p. 15, 2009.
8. H. Ramakonar, E. A. Franz, and C. R. Lind, The rubber hand illusion and its application to clinical neuroscience, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1596-1601, 2011.
9. A. Ajoudani, S. Godfrey, M. Catalano, G. Grioli, N. Tsagarakis, and A. Bicchi, Teleimpedance control of a synergy-driven anthropomorphic hand, in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, 2013, pp. 1985-1991.
10. L. R. Hochberg, D. Bacher, B. Jarosiewicz, N. Y. Masse, J. D. Simeral, J. Vogel, S. Haddadin, J. Liu, S. S. Cash, P. van der Smagt et al., Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm, Nature, vol. 485, no. 7398, pp. 372-375, 2012.
11. A. Fougner, O. Stavdahl, P. J. Kyberd, Y. G. Losier, and P. A. Parker, Control of upper limb prostheses: Terminology and proportional myoelectric controla review, Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 663-677, 2012.
12. P. Cherelle, V. Grosu, A. Matthys, B. Vanderborght, and D. Lefeber, Design and validation of the ankle mimicking prosthetic (amp-) foot 2.0, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 22, 2013.
13. S. K. Au and H. Herr, Powered ankle-foot prosthesis, Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 52-59, 2008.
14. J. Geeroms, L. Flynn, R. Jimenez-Fabian, B. Vanderborght, and D. Lefeber, Ankle-knee prosthesis with powered ankle and energy transfer for cyberlegs-prototype, in Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, 2013, pp. 1-6.
15. R. Unal, F. Klijnstra, B. Burkink, S. Behrens, E. Hekman, S. Stramigioli, H. Koopman, and R. Carloni, Modeling of walkmech: A fullypassive energy-efficient transfemoral prosthesis prototype. in IEEE... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics: [proceedings], vol. 2013, 2013, pp. 1-6.
16. O. Christ, J. Wojtusch, P. Beckerle, K. Wolff, J. Vogt, O. von Stryk, and S. Rinderknecht, Prosthesis-user-in-The-loop: User-centered design parameters and visual simulation, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2012, pp. 1929-1932.
17. A. Kalckert and H. H. Ehrsson, Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency, Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 6, 2012.
18. J. W. Moore, D. M. Wegner, and P. Haggard, Modulating the sense of agency with external cues, Consciousness and cognition, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1056-1064, 2009.
19. M. Riemer, D. Kleinböhl, R. Hölzl, and J. Trojan, Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion, Experimental brain research, vol. 229, no. 3, pp. 383-393, 2013.
20. O. Christ, P. Beckerle, J. Preller, M. Jokisch, S. Rinderknecht, J. Wojtusch, O. von Stryk, and J. Vogt, The rubber hand illusion: Maintaining factors and a new perspective in rehabilitation and biomedical engineering? Biomed Tech, vol. 57, pp. 846-849, 2012.
21. M. Hara, H. Nabae, A. Yamamoto, and T. Higuchi, Effect of force feedback on rubber hand illusion, in Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, 2013, pp. 536-541.
22. D. Prattichizzo, M. Malvezzi, and A. Bicchi, On motion and force controllability of grasping hands with postural synergies. in Robotics: Science and Systems, 2010.
23. A. Bicchi, Hands for dexterous manipulation and robust grasping: A difficult road toward simplicity, Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 652-662, 2000.
24. W. Townsend, Mcbindustrial robot feature articlebarrett hand grasper, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 181-188, 2000.
25. R. Rosenthal and K. L. Fode, The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat, Behavioral Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 183-189, 1963.
26. E. Poliakoff, N. Beach, R. Best, T. Howard, and E. Gowen, Can looking at a hand make your skin crawl? peering into the uncanny valley for hands, Perception, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 998-1000, 2013.
27. S. Ocklenburg, N. Ruther, J. Peterburs, M. Pinnow, and O. Gunturkun, Laterality in the rubber hand illusion, Laterality, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 174-187, 2011.
28. M. Controzzi, C. Cipriani, and M. C. Carrozza, Design of artificial hands: A review, in The Human Hand as an Inspiration for Robot Hand Development. Springer, 2014, pp. 219-246.
29. B. Vanderborght, A. Albu-Schaeffer, A. Bicchi, E. Burdet, D. Caldwell, R. Carloni, M. Catalano, O. Eiberger, W. Friedl, G. Ganesh et al., Variable impedance actuators: A review, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1601-1614, 2013.
30. Attribution non commercial share alike license, CREATIVE COMMONS CORPORATION. [Online]. Available: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/legalcode
31. S. Kuznetsov and E. Paulos, Rise of the expert amateur: Diy projects, communities, and cultures, in Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. ACM, 2010, pp. 295-304.
32. S. Davis, N. G. Tsagarakis, and D. G. Caldwell, The initial design and manufacturing process of a low cost hand for the robot icub, in Humanoid Robots, 2008. Humanoids 2008. 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on, 2008, pp. 40-45.
33. R. Jones, P. Haufe, E. Sells, P. Iravani, V. Olliver, C. Palmer, and A. Bowyer, Reprap-The replicating rapid prototyper, Robotica, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 177-191, 2011.
34. G. Christopher, W. Michael, A. Timothy, G. Scott, F. Richard, and H. Tracy, Angular displacement sensors, Patent US5 086 785, 1992.
35. D. Mellis, M. Banzi, D. Cuartielles, and T. Igoe, Arduino: An open electronic prototyping platform, in Proc. CHI, 2007.
36. M. Borgo, A. Soranzo, and M. Grassi, Psychtoolbox: Sound, keyboard and mouse, in MATLAB for Psychologists. Springer, 2012.
37. E. Caspar, A. De Beir, P. Magalhaes De Saldanha da Gama, F. Yernaux, A. Cleermans, and B. Vanderborght, New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: when a robotic hand becomes ones own, 2013, behavior Research Methods, under review.
38. H. H. Ehrsson, C. Spence, and R. E. Passingham, Thats my hand! activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb, Science, vol. 305, no. 5685, pp. 875-877, 2004.
39. P. D. Marasco, K. Kim, J. E. Colgate, M. A. Peshkin, and T. A. Kuiken, Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees, Brain, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 747-758, 2011.